alt.politics.usa.constitution.gun-rights
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.politics.usa.constitution.gun-rights only
 
Advanced search
January 2007
mo tu we th fr sa su w
1234567 1
891011121314 2
15161718192021 3
22232425262728 4
293031     5
2007
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2007 2006 2005 2004
total
alt.politics ... gun-rights Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  Filmmaker Aaron Russo Says 9/11 Was A Fraud         


Author: Midex
Date: Jan 18, 2007 07:13

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okLrWV6ObwI&NR

Interesting because in Aaron Russo's film Freedom to Fascism (making a
storm in the USA right now) he doesn't mention 9/11 at all and was
criticised by the 9/11 Truth movement because its impossible to talk
about Fascism without mentioning 9/11.

All we have here is more and more people coming out and speaking the
truth. But the growth rate isn't enough to look forward to depose the
guilty parties. If we don't grow quickly enough the criminals will get
away.

I don't know one person in the working class world who would like to
see these criminals get away. The problem is too few even know that
these people were involved in 9/11. Too many are still sucker to the
big lie.

Its so dangerous now for the future of democracy and equality and human
rights. It is so sad how everyone has been fooled and still too many
are fooled into not even realising that these fascists are moving fast
to seize world domination and with that control they will enslave the
masses and even wipe us out in plague if the world gets too populated
(it already is)
Show full article (1.33Kb)
3 Comments
  Re: A Rifle in Every Pot         


Author: Kunt Harrington
Date: Jan 18, 2007 05:58

"The Lone Weasel" gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98BBC1EB7C2A4loneweaselyhdc@204.153.244.170...
> samovar said:
>> The Lone Weasel wrote:
>>> "bo peep" yahoo.com> said:
>>>> editor@netpath.net wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Nil first-time
>>>>> gun ownership resulting from such a law in such an area means no
>>>>> additional deterrent effect, crime reduction, or crime increase is
>>>>> plausible.
>>>> Wrong - actual gun *ownership* is not necessary in order to have a
>>>> deterrent effect.
>>>
>>> So, although the gun industry's flooded America with more guns than
>>> humans,
>>
>> And the plastics industry flooded us with more disposable sporks than
>> humans ...
Show full article (1.96Kb)
no comments
  Re: A Rifle in Every Pot         


Author: Kunt Harrington
Date: Jan 18, 2007 05:57

"The Lone Weasel" gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98BBB5478CE07loneweaselyhdc@204.153.244.170...
> "bo peep" yahoo.com> said:
>> editor@netpath.net wrote:
>
>
>>> Nil first-time
>>> gun ownership resulting from such a law in such an area means no
>>> additional deterrent effect, crime reduction, or crime increase is
>>> plausible.
>>
>> Wrong - actual gun *ownership* is not necessary in order to have a
>> deterrent effect.
>
> So, although the gun industry's flooded America with more guns than
> humans,
> tough gun control has finally made guns superfluous. You don't even need
> any guns for the fear of nonexistent guns to frighten off burglars,
> muggers, terrorists, so why keep buying them?
Show full article (3.83Kb)
no comments
  Re: The final test of the 2nd Amendment?         


Author:
Date: Jan 17, 2007 18:41

Rich Travsky hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in
news:45AAF9D4.C572C9D9@hotmMOVEail.com:
>> I hate to use one of Lone Weasel's terms, but.......since that
>> militia serves both the state and the feds depending on who calls it
>> to service, don't you think that possibly the use of the militia just
>> might be different? Particularly since the state does not have the
>> onus of suppressing insurrections?
>>
>> Damn, I didn't even have to use LW's term, but I was thinking it.
>
> So then the conclusion is that militia can be called by Congress to
> suppress insurrections against the federal government. With all that
> that implies.

Yep, unless a state portion of it is already in service to the state.

--
Sleep well tonight.........RD (The Sandman)
http://home.comcast.net/~rdsandman

"Tis far better to burn the flag while wrapped in the Constitution than
to burn the Constitution while wrapped in the flag."
Show full article (1.15Kb)
no comments
  Re: The final test of the 2nd Amendment?         


Author:
Date: Jan 17, 2007 18:40

Rich Travsky hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in
news:45AAF4E3.7F4F1276@hotmMOVEail.com:
>>> BS. It mentioned militia as the reason that right needed to be
>>>> protected. It does not assign that right to the militia, it still
>>>> belongs to the people.
>>>
>>> No militia, the right is not needed.
>>
>> But it is still there. You don't even understand that RKBA wasn't
>> granted by the Constitution (of which the 2A is a part) and is not
>> reliant on that Constitution for its existance.
>
> The Constitution trumps all.

And the USSC tells us how to interpret it.
>> Tell us the truth....is Miller the only case you have looked at?
>> Have you even read Miller? Do you understand the context in which
>> that cite from Miller you keep posting was made? I doubt it.
>
> Nope, yes, and yes.
Show full article (1.91Kb)
no comments
  Re: The final test of the 2nd Amendment?         


Author:
Date: Jan 17, 2007 18:38

Rich Travsky hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in
news:45AAF506.6FA3A9BA@hotmMOVEail.com:
> "RD (The Sandman)" wrote:
>> Rich Travsky hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in
>> news:45A1C5D2.D491ED29
>>> "RD (The Sandman)" wrote:
>>>> Rich Travsky hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in
>>>>...
Show full article (7.44Kb)
no comments
  Re: The final test of the 2nd Amendment?         


Author:
Date: Jan 17, 2007 18:37

Rich Travsky hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in
news:45AAF429.290DF1E9@hotmMOVEail.com:
> "RD (The Sandman)" wrote:
>> Rich Travsky hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in
>>> "RD (The Sandman)" wrote:
>>>> Rich Travsky hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in
>>>>
>>>>>> IOW, the right of...
Show full article (2.50Kb)
no comments
  Re: The final test of the 2nd Amendment?         


Author:
Date: Jan 17, 2007 18:37

Rich Travsky hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in
news:45AAF28A.24B17CFB@hotmMOVEail.com:
> "RD (The Sandman)" wrote:
>> Rich Travsky hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in
>>> "RD (The Sandman)" wrote:
>>>> Rich Travsky hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in
>>>>> Scout wrote:
>>>>>> "Rich...
Show full article (4.06Kb)
no comments
  A Rifle in Every Pot         


Author: Melanie RockyFord
Date: Jan 16, 2007 20:52

_http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/16/opinion/16reynolds.html?ex=1169614800
&en=bc 1fa12c5e8e1fcf&ei=5070&emc=eta1_
(http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/16/opinion/16reynolds.html?ex=1169614800
&en=bc1fa12c5e8e1fcf&ei=5070&emc=eta1)

January 16, 2007
Op-Ed Contributor
A Rifle in Every Pot
By GLENN REYNOLDS

Knoxville, Tenn.
IT
4 Comments
  Congress Wants To Muzzle Our Lobbying Voice         


Author: Melanie RockyFord
Date: Jan 16, 2007 20:45

------- Forwarded message follows -------
Subject: Congress Wants To Muzzle Our Lobbying Voice
From: "Gun Owners of America"
capwiz.mailmanager.net>
Send reply to: "Gun Owners of America"
capwiz.mailmanager.net>
Date sent: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 12:52:48 -0500 (EST)

Senate Takes Up Legislation To Stymie Grassroots Lobbying

Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
http://www.gunowners.org

Tuesday, January 16, 2007

When you look at GOA's year-ending report at
http://www.gunowners.org/a121406.htm, you can see that your
grassroots efforts had a tremendous impact upon the legislative
process last year.

There is no doubt that you guys have made a difference.
Show full article (5.22Kb)
no comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9