> In article r66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> The_Carpathia yahoo.com> writes:
>
>
>

>> On Jun 12, 9:58 am, c...@afone.as.arizona.edu (Cary Kittrell) wrote:

>>> In article <9c8ddae6-b59d-4503-9dbe-b36e01d87...@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> The_Carpathia yahoo.com> writes:

>

>>>> With all of the people trying to find someone to blame for higher fuel
>>>> prices and unemployment, it is notable to mention that Bill Clinton
>>>> recently said we SHOULD slow down the economy...for the environment...

>

>>>>http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/01/bill-we-just-ha.html

>

>>>> That link has a link to the quote and video clip in question. It
>>>> should be totally clear to anyone that the motivation behind the
>>>> global warming promotion is the socialist goal of equal distribution
>>>> of income, worldwide, since Clinton says the "rich countries" should
>>>> cut back on production, while the poor, socialist, countries would be
>>>> allowed to keep their production running full steam (let it be noted
>>>> that one of those "poor" countries...China...is the world's largest
>>>> air polluter. Thus, Clinton and the other global warming advocates
>>>> only want CAPITALIST countries to slow production, while giving a
>>>> green light to socialist countries. That's not a conspiracy theory,
>>>> anymore. It's straight from their own mouths.

>

>>> And just why do you automatically characterize any poor
>>> third-world country as "socialist"?

>

>>>> So, what do you think? Feel like paying more and having less jobs to
>>>> support worldwide socialism?

>

>>> How un-Christian to suggest that the rich give something
>>> of themselves to help the poor.

>

>>> -- cary

>

>> Suggest that they give or steal from the rich (against their will)?

>
> "...they give or steal from the rich"?
>
> In some language that's English?
>
> If we voluntarily choose to slow our growth while other nations come up
> to speed, that's somehow "stealing", "against our will"?