|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: guybannister58guybannister58
Date: Jan 31, 2008 22:26
Quite simply, this may very well be one of the most disturbing
videos you'll ever see.
http://saveourstate.org/vforums/showthread.php?t=31357
AND IT NEEDS TO BE SEEN BY AS MANY AMERICANS AS POSSIBLE!
Even as they play on a shiny new, pricey, state-of-the-art
playground apparatus, from across a busy major boulevard dozens of
kindergarten-aged anchor babies of illegal aliens are heard loudly,
contemptuously, and utterly disrespectfully taunting the U.S. citizens
across the street (that is, the very Americans whose taxes paid for
not only the playground apparatus but the entire school it's installed
at, alas) who are displaying U.S. flags with shrieks of,
"¡MEXICO! ¡MEXICO! ¡MEXICO!"
http://saveourstate.org/vforums/showthread.php?t=31357
As they say, you really have to see it to believe it.
One horrified American woman is so upset by the surreal scene she's
witnessing that -- her voice almost breaking but simultaneously
betraying revulsion, righteous indignation and anguish -- she
exclaims,
|
| Show full article (7.40Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
Date: Jan 31, 2008 21:10
Obama wants summit with Muslim countries
Reuters
Thursday, January 31, 2008
Paris (Reuters) - Democratic presidential candidate Barack
Obama told a French magazine in an interview that if he
wins office, he will hold a summit with Muslim countries to
better the United States' image in the world.
"Once I'm elected, I want to organize a summit in the
Muslim world, with all the heads of state, to have an
honest discussion about ways to bridge the gap that grows
every day between Muslims and the West," Thursday's edition
of Paris Match quoted Obama as saying,
"I want to ask them to join our fight against terrorism. We
must also listen to their concerns," Obama said in the
French-language transcript.
The Illinois senator is running neck-and-neck against
senator Hillary Clinton from New York to lead the
Democratic ticket in November's presidential election.
|
| Show full article (3.28Kb) |
|
| |
1 Comment |
|
  |
Author: DeserTBoBDeserTBoB
Date: Jan 31, 2008 21:02
Looks like our righttard pals are all having a collective depressive
episode, as they were expecting a WWF-style rumble, and instead got an
intelligent "conversation/debate" between the two people of whom one
will be the next president.
It's obvious that the usual catcalls and puerile posts won't occur,
because the far right loonies may have finally realized after the CNN
debate in Hollywood that their "fifteen minutes of fame" has been
expired for a long, long time, and they'll disappear now, just like
the Birchers and the other far right wackos did at the end of the
Eisenhower era.
The pendulum indeed does swing both ways.
|
| |
|
2 Comments |
|
  |
Author: DeserTBoBDeserTBoB
Date: Jan 31, 2008 20:56
Now THERE'S a sign that the neocons are falling on their swords! I
like how he was blubbering on CNN about being insulted by the
Democratic crowd at the Kodak. They SHOULD have given him a blanket
party...except, possibly, no one had any blankets big enough!
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: richardhutnikrichardhutnik
Date: Jan 31, 2008 20:18
In one radio talk show bit, there was talk about Huckabee staying in,
with no chance to win, is splitting the "anti-McCain vote". Like
HUH? Can anyone name a larger presumptive comment than this?
Huckabee gets evangelicals. Someone tell me that evangelicals are
just eager to be "anti-McCain" to the extent they will vote for an
individual who most consider is part of a religious cult?
Is there something missing from this equation here? Please fill in
the blanks.
By the way, being "anti-" is a major thing wrong with the GOP today.
It is based around having people vote for the "lesser of two evils".
Let, Anti-McCain, or Anti-Hillary.
- Rich
|
| |
|
6 Comments |
|
  |
Author: bvallelybvallely
Date: Jan 31, 2008 20:08
.
>> Without security you privacy is a moot point.
.
> What a con! Privacy is inexorably linked to security, ie: if you have
> privacy you have security,>
.
How does that work, exactly? How does allowing terrorists to take
flying lessons where they don't want to learn how to land secret keep
plans from crashing into skyscrapers?
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: Kickin' Ass and Takin' NamesKickin' Ass and Takin' Names
Date: Jan 31, 2008 18:58
On Jan 31, 8:41Â pm, Raymond aol.com> wrote:
> Vietnam Veterans Against John McCain
>
> Ted Sampley, a  Vietnam Veteran and former Green Beret, Â
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: SimpsonSimpson
Date: Jan 31, 2008 18:58
Nebuchadnezzar II wrote:
> "Genaro" wrote in message
> news:Xns9A35C964E1F3Dqwertyuiop@130.81.64.196...
>> richardhutnik@ gmail.com wrote in
>> news:8738a15b-fd1a-4f6a-82d2-04fbeace8254@s13g2000prd.googlegro
>> ups.com:
>>
>> -------
>> In Fiscal Year 2006, the U.S. Government spent $406 Billion of
>> your money on interest payments* to the holders of the National
>> Debt. ...
|
| Show full article (0.89Kb) |
|
1 Comment |
|
  |
Author: MasterChiefMasterChief
Date: Jan 31, 2008 18:36
In 1996, Congress passed the Health Information and Portability Act (HIPA),
a "Hillarycare-lite" bill expanding federal control over health care in a
variety of ways. One of the most insidious provisions hidden in the bill was
a scheme to assign every American a "unique health identifier" to facilitate
the storage of all health care records in a government-managed database.
When Congressman Ron Paul learned of this, he knew he had to act. "As an
OB/GYN with more than 30 years experience in private practice, I know better
than most the importance of preserving the sanctity of the physician-patient
relationship. What happens to that trust when patients know any and all
information given to their doctor will be placed in a database accessible by
anyone who knows the patient's
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: DeserTBoBDeserTBoB
Date: Jan 31, 2008 18:35
In what will probably be a stinging defeat for righttards like the
gluttonous/degenerate gambler/dry drunk Bill Bennett and drug
addict/Viagra hound Rish Limbaugh, the "rumble" expected at the Kodak
Theater isn't happening...at all...although Clinton's looking stronger
on issues, which are all important at this time. They're BOTH beating
up on McCain, and did a couple of pre-emptive salvos against
Romney...as it should be. After the nasty Republican fiasco at the
RayGun airplane hanger last night, it is positively refreshing to hear
two rational people discuss the mess that George W. Bush has put this
country in, and how much work it's going to be to clean up after him.
Righttards lose...Dems win with either candidate.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|