|
|
 Up |
|
  |
|
|
|
Author: josejose Date: Oct 3, 2007 16:55
On Oct 3, 8:06 am, "RightIsRong" CrawfordRanch.net>
wrote:> PRESIDENT BUSH HAS VETOED THE SCHIP BILL, WHICH WOULD HAVE EXPANDED HEALTH
> INSURANCE FOR CHILDREN
>
> http://abcnews.go.com?CMP=EMC-1396
>
> $15 billion a month for Iraq, free healthcare for Bush & family but nothing
> for America.
> Who voted for this shitass of a traitor?
Hello? The Democrat bill defined children as up to
age 25 and included "poor" families who earn
up to $82,000. The bill is a liberal sham and
a blatant attempt to incrementally sneak in
Nurse HillaryCare. I voted for the shitass
who finally figured out that he had a veto pen.
I hope Bush vetoes every piece of shit legislation
the socialist Democrats send him.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: John BlackJohn Black Date: Oct 3, 2007 17:08
> On Oct 3, 8:06 am, "RightIsRong" CrawfordRanch.net>
> wrote:>> PRESIDENT BUSH HAS VETOED THE SCHIP BILL, WHICH WOULD HAVE EXPANDED HEALTH
>> INSURANCE FOR CHILDREN
>>
>> http://abcnews.go.com?CMP=EMC-1396
>>
>> $15 billion a month for Iraq, free healthcare for Bush & family but nothing
>> for America.
>> Who voted for this shitass of a traitor? >
> Hello? The Democrat bill defined children as up to
> age 25 and included "poor" families who earn
> up to $82,000. The bill is a liberal sham and
> a blatant attempt to incrementally sneak in
> Nurse HillaryCare.
|
| Show full article (1.22Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: The VicarThe Vicar Date: Oct 3, 2007 18:18
> PRESIDENT BUSH HAS VETOED THE SCHIP BILL, WHICH WOULD HAVE EXPANDED HEALTH
> INSURANCE FOR CHILDREN
he's a disgrace and his supporters are criminals.
>
> http://abcnews.go.com?CMP=EMC-1396
>
> $15 billion a month for Iraq, free healthcare for Bush & family but
> nothing for America.
> Who voted for this shitass of a traitor?
>
>
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Ms. A. WombusterMs. A. Wombuster Date: Oct 3, 2007 19:49
+++++
Of course your Nincompoop-In-Chief would veto a childrens' health
insurance program.
Why not? After all ...
1) He's your White House war criminal.
2) He's the protector of wealthy-CEO-managed private, translated -
too expensive, health programs.
3) He's a "compassionate conservative."
4) He's an advertised "born-again-christian."
5) He's the leader of the Red States.
6) He's global enemy number one.
7) He's your ignorer of Constitutional laws.
8) He's the worst "president" in U.S. history.
9) He's the most hated "president" in U.S. history.
10) He's, like the rest of his family, a detester and loather of
ordinary Americans.
|
| Show full article (1.05Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ThomThom Date: Oct 3, 2007 20:23
> On Oct 3, 8:06 am, "RightIsRong" CrawfordRanch.net>
> wrote:>> PRESIDENT BUSH HAS VETOED THE SCHIP BILL, WHICH WOULD HAVE EXPANDED
>> HEALTH
>> INSURANCE FOR CHILDREN
>>
>> http://abcnews.go.com?CMP=EMC-1396
>>
>> $15 billion a month for Iraq, free healthcare for Bush & family but
>> nothing
>> for America.
>> Who voted for this shitass of a traitor? >
> Hello? The Democrat bill defined children as up to
> age 25 and included "poor" families who earn
> up to $82,000. The bill is a liberal sham and
> a blatant attempt to incrementally sneak in
> Nurse HillaryCare. I voted for the shitass ...
|
| Show full article (0.96Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: GeoGeo Date: Oct 3, 2007 21:18
On Oct 3, 1:49 pm, "Ms. A. Wombuster" yahoo.com> wrote:> +++++
>
> Of course your Nincompoop-In-Chief would veto a childrens' health
> insurance program.
>
> Why not? After all ...
>
> 1) He's your White House war criminal.
>
> 2) He's the protector of wealthy-CEO-managed private, translated -
> too expensive, health programs.
>
> 3) He's a "compassionate conservative."
>
> 4) He's an advertised "born-again-christian."
>
> 5) He's the leader of the Red States.
>
> 6) He's global enemy number one. ...
|
| Show full article (1.27Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: James Of TucsonJames Of Tucson Date: Oct 3, 2007 21:36
On Oct 3, 12:30 pm, "Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute"
whitehouse.gov> wrote:>> Of course your Nincompoop-In-Chief would veto a childrens' health
>> insurance program.
>
> What part of the Constitution permits federal involvement in healthcare?
>
> Article and Section, please:
>
> Article:
>
> Section:
Article I, Section 8.
|
| Show full article (1.20Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Scott SScott S Date: Oct 3, 2007 21:44
On Oct 3, 12:29 pm, "Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute"
whitehouse.gov> wrote:>> "John Black" texas.net> wrote in message
>>news:MPG.216d6c542d3f49659898a1@free.teranews.com...>>>> On Oct 3, 8:06 am, "RightIsRong" CrawfordRanch.net>
>>>> wrote:>>>>> PRESIDENT BUSH HAS VETOED THE SCHIP BILL, WHICH WOULD HAVE EXPANDED
>>>>> HEALTH
>>>>> INSURANCE FOR CHILDREN ...
|
| Show full article (1.90Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
