|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: saladsalad
Date: Jan 5, 2007 22:15
Harry Hope wrote:
The Jeff Gannon bangings must be hidden from the public.
|
| |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: KenKen
Date: Jan 5, 2007 21:36
comcast.net> wrote in message
news:oh3up2l7lbj3j9hdi7dodbs1rvnl6cvom4@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 18:30:20 -0800, Pelosi Lied
> libsalwaystelllies.com> wrote:>>
>>On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 00:30:16 GMT, Harry Hope ix.netcom.com>
>>wrote:
>>>>
>>
>>WOW
>>
>>Another Democratic lie uncovered.
>>
>>They said the election was about Iraq, but are sneeking in bills to ...
|
| Show full article (2.06Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: JHMJHM
Date: Jan 5, 2007 21:12
This blazing analysis seems to me basically correct, and as a partisan
donkey the great thing seems to me to be that the bushogenic fiasco
must NOT be taken out of the paws of the Crawfordites into more
competent hands, that it must remain the Kiddie Krusaders' Party War
all the way to the end of it. Which end need not be quite so
disastrous as some expect -- but that's another story.
Meanwhile the omens seem favorable: the Dynasty Brat shows no serious
inclination to allow Congress to assist the Executive in its
self-inflicted Peaceful Freedumbian perplexities, and so when the
Freddie Kagan AEIdeological "surge" is over with, it won't be the fault
of the Legislative branch that even that last-ditch neo-gimmick didn't
work.
"I think he expected the Democratic Congress to balk, and then he could
start backing out and blame the Dems" is perhaps a bit less than
blazing. The calculation is OK in itself, but are we seriously to
suppose that 566/640 Party-crazed Yalies can calculate like that? I
think not.
_Mais nous verrons_.
|
| Show full article (2.25Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: robwrobw
Date: Jan 5, 2007 20:40
And these Judges have done what so far?
Prevented Gays from civil unions?
Outlawed abortion?
Removed Affirmative Action?
Amd you certainly weren't celebrating on Nov. 7th.
Pop a cork for us, won't ya?
|
| Show full article (0.75Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author:
Date: Jan 5, 2007 20:32
"Amanda Williams" fu.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98AEDE0F4C658fubar@63.218.45.252...> rotfl...
>
> You could just hear the pathetic little rightard girly boyz sobbing and
> sniffling as MADAME SPEAKER Pelosi takes the gavel...
>
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: KenKen
Date: Jan 5, 2007 20:28
>
> Yes. It makes sense.
>
> Send an admiral to fight a land war.
>
> He manages to outod Philip II of Spain, who sent the Invincible Armada
> under the command of an admiral who got regularly seasick.
Umm, the Navy does have ground forces. How do you think they took part in
Operation Anaconda in Afghanistan, several hundred miles inland from the
nearest open waters? Swam there?
Have a nice day,
Ken
|
| |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
Author: The TruckerThe Trucker
Date: Jan 5, 2007 20:26
wrote in message
news:723tp2lhkb8a8ce9u3rbia82hdk1rso3js@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 17:26:27 GMT, Harry Hope ix.netcom.com>
> wrote:
>>>
>>Biden said that Vice President Cheney and former defense secretary
>>Donald H. Rumsfeld "are really smart guys who made a very, very, very,
>>very bad bet, and it blew up in their faces. Now, what do they do with
>>it? I think they have concluded they can't fix it, so how do you keep
>>it stitched together without it completely unraveling?"
>
> It seems to me that they are pursuing the only strategy they have left
> at this point, which is to hold on until the Democrats take it out of
> their hands, then blame the Democrats for losing the war.
>
> Bush wants a 'surge' now, to temporarily increase troop strength. But
> he hasn't articulated a plan, he hasn't been able to explain just how
> this will help. His generals didn't see how it could help so he
> canned them. I think he expected the Democratic Congress to balk, and ...
|
| Show full article (2.15Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Fred FazemeierFred Fazemeier
Date: Jan 5, 2007 20:10
> An existential question: If journalism is the first draft of history, then
> what is journalism that denies history? Is it still journalism?
More hysterical temper tantrums over the idiot left's hero being
executed. Please try to control yourself, nut.
I just read the other posts. Sorry, dude, I didn't know you were mentally
challenged. I will refrain from saying mean things to you in the future, I
thought you were being an asshole on purpose.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Fred FazemeierFred Fazemeier
Date: Jan 5, 2007 20:08
> An existential question: If journalism is the first draft of history, then
> what is journalism that denies history? Is it still journalism?
More hysterical temper tantrums over the idiot left's hero being
executed. Please try to control yourself, nut.
How about checking out how much Saddam was our puppet forever. Our country
loved him and used him up, then killed him. Go read some history.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
