|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Arizona BushwhackerArizona Bushwhacker
Date: Apr 30, 2008 23:34
How many years have I been posting to
alt.politics.bush? Lots would be my best
guess. How many friends have I made?
None, would be my best guess. How many
people still respect me? Again, none, would
be my best guess. Do I care? Hell no!
Not even one little fucking bit!
Over the last several years I have gone out
of my way to be as outrageous as possible,
(if need be) to get my point across.
|
| Show full article (1.07Kb) |
|
| |
1 Comment |
|
|
Author: harryharry52harryharry52
Date: Apr 30, 2008 23:31
Still no sign of a bottom. Don't hold your breath----prices yet have
a long way to go:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
April 30, 2008
Confidence Falls as Home Prices Decline
By MICHAEL M. GRYNBAUM
Americans’ confidence in the economy plunged again this month, and
their homes lost value at the fastest rate in two decades, according
to two reports released on Tuesday.
The data ratcheted up pressure on the Federal Reserve to take further
steps to stave off a prolonged slowdown, even as inflation remains a
threat. The central bank is widely expected to lower its benchmark
interest rate by a quarter-point when it concludes its policy-setting
meeting on Wednesday.
Most economists said the consumer confidence and housing reports were
consistent with a recession, although some maintain that the economy
is growing, albeit at a very slow pace. In a news conference on
Tuesday, President Bush sided with the optimists although he said the
economy was facing “a tough time.â€
|
| Show full article (5.10Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
Author: 0BZN00BZN0
Date: Apr 30, 2008 22:54
Be warned AGW-zealots-with-a-socialist-agenda, it's not a pretty
picture!
http://www.warwickhughes.com/hoyt/scorecard.htm
--
Warmest Regards
Bonzo
"Every year they recalibrate their computer model and put in the
observed temperature. So, as they go along, the curve that trails behind
is perfect. It's like predicting the morning's weather at six-o'clock in
the evening.." Dr. Don J. Easterbrook, Professor Emeritus Geology,
Western Washington University
|
| |
|
2 Comments |
|
|
Author: 0BZN00BZN0
Date: Apr 30, 2008 22:51
ROTFLMAO
Apocalypse Now Delayed Due To Faulty Climate Models
May 01, 2008
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/apoca.../
Are we allowed to doubt that "consensus" yet?
Researchers studying long-term changes in sea temperatures said they now
expect a "lull" for up to a decade while natural variations in climate
cancel out the increases caused by man-made greenhouse gas emissions.
This would mean that the 0.3°C global average temperature rise which has
been predicted for the next decade by the UN's Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change may not happen, according to the paper published in
the scientific journal Nature.
However, the effect of rising fossil fuel emissions will mean that
warming will accelerate again after 2015 when natural trends in the
oceans veer back towards warming, according to the computer model.
Writing in Nature, the scientists said: "Our results suggest that global
surface temperature may not increase over the next decade, as natural
climate variations in the North Atlantic and tropical Pacific
temporarily offset the projected anthropogenic [manmade] warming."
|
| Show full article (2.57Kb) |
|
2 Comments |
|
|
Author: 0BZN00BZN0
Date: Apr 30, 2008 22:50
Surprise, surprise!!!!
Please wait whilst we adjust our climate models for reality!
May 01, 2008
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/apoca.../
Are we allowed to doubt that "consensus" yet?
Researchers studying long-term changes in sea temperatures said they now
expect a "lull" for up to a decade while natural variations in climate
cancel out the increases caused by man-made greenhouse gas emissions.
This would mean that the 0.3°C global average temperature rise which has
been predicted for the next decade by the UN's Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change may not happen, according to the paper published in
the scientific journal Nature.
However, the effect of rising fossil fuel emissions will mean that
warming will accelerate again after 2015 when natural trends in the
oceans veer back towards warming, according to the computer model.
Writing in Nature, the scientists said: "Our results suggest that global
surface temperature may not increase over the next decade, as natural
climate variations in the North Atlantic and tropical Pacific
temporarily offset the projected anthropogenic [manmade] warming."
|
| Show full article (2.14Kb) |
|
43 Comments |
|
|
Author: 0BZN00BZN0
Date: Apr 30, 2008 22:31
"Ouroboros_Rex" casual.com> wrote in message
news:fvaemo$4e5$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu...>> On Apr 30, 1:17 pm, "Ouroboros_Rex" casual.com> wrote:> This sounds like more sunspots hoax. There is no meaningful
> correlation between sunspot number and global climate.
Oh yeah????
PDO And Solar Correlate Better Than CO2
AND NEGATIVE CORRELATION FOR CO2 FROM 1998
http://www.junkscience.com:80/blog_js/2008/01/25/warming-trend-pdo-and-solar-correlate...
Joe D'Aleo, an AMS Certified Consulting Meteorologist, one of the
founders of The Weather Channel and who operates the website ICECAP took
it upon himself to do an analysis of the newly released USHCN2 surface
temperature data set and compare it against measured trends of CO2,
Pacific Decadal Oscillation, and Solar Irradiance. to see which one
matched better.
|
| Show full article (8.25Kb) |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
Author: 0BZN00BZN0
Date: Apr 30, 2008 22:30
> On Apr 30, 1:17 pm, "Ouroboros_Rex" casual.com> wrote:
> The global cooling discussion is no hoax once you get past all the
> sloppy speculation. The interesting question is how much it'll offset
> what CO2-driven warming we could have had by 2050.
>
Sorry, no CO2 driven warming exists/
It's the sun stupid.
Warmest Regards
Bonzo
"From 1870 to 1900, we had global cooling, then we had significant
global warming from about 1910 to 1945. That global warming is not
accompanied by any significant rise in CO2, so you can't blame CO2. Then
CO2 increased while we had global cooling. You can't blame that on CO2.
It's only been the last 30 years there's been correlation between CO2
and global warming" Dr. Don J. Easterbrook, Professor Emeritus Geology,
Western Washington University
|
| |
|
2 Comments |
|
|
Author: 0BZN00BZN0
Date: Apr 30, 2008 22:26
"Scientists" desperately rejig their useless climate models to follow
unexpected climate!
Does anyone see the hilarity in this?
Make predictions and then adjust if not correct!
Geeeez I could do better and without a computer !
ROTFLMAO
Global Warming May Stop, Scientists Predict
Charles Clover, Environment Editor
30 Apr 2008
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2008/04/30/eaclimate130.x...
Global warming will stop until at least 2015 because of natural
variations in the climate, scientists have said.
The study predicts the IPCC's 0.3ºC temperature rise for the next decade
may not happen
The average temperature of the sea around Europe and North America is
expected to cool slightly over the decade while the tropical Pacific
remains unchanged.
|
| Show full article (5.96Kb) |
|
4 Comments |
|
|
Author: 0BZN00BZN0
Date: Apr 30, 2008 22:15
"Roger Coppock" adnc.com> wrote in message
news:d7fc3a64-44fb-402a-8efe-96804f95abd9@a9g2000prl.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 30, 3:11 pm, matt_sykes hotmail.com> wrote:> On Apr 30, 9:42 pm, Roger Coppock adnc.com> wrote:
>>> Welcome to Roger Coppock's new health plan:
>> EXPOSE A FOSSIL FOOL LIE A DAY, AND KEEP THE ONCOLOGIST AWAY.
>> DAY 1
>
>> BOZNO SAYS, "CO2 Anti-Correlates With Global Temperature, Except For
>> 1980 To 1998"
>
>> Bonzo lies!
>
>> OK, Lets remove the years 1980 through 1998 from the
>> data and then do the math.
>
>> Call:
>> lm(formula = Temp ~ CO2, data = aframe)
> ...
|
| Show full article (10.32Kb) |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
