Why Did Crawford Aggress? It May Be Simpler Than You Think.
22 October 2006

"Powers will be powers"
--A. J. P. Taylor

Or maybe it was not quite so simple as that?

Mr. Patrick Cockburn of the _Observer_ observes as follows:

The debate on why the US invaded Iraq has been oversophisticated. The
main motive for going to war was that the White House thought it could
win such a conflict very easily and to its own great advantage. They
were heady times in Washington in 2002, as the final decisions were
being taken to invade Iraq. It was the high tide of imperial
self-confidence. The US had just achieved a swift victory in
Afghanistan. The Taliban forces had evaporated after a few weeks of
bombing by B-52s and the withdrawal of Pakistani support. Their
strongholds in Kabul and Kandahar fell with scarcely a shot fired. To
Tony Blair, believing that the US was about to fight another short and
victorious war, support for Bush must have looked like a safe bet.

Bluff called. Here's one (with plenty of pro Bush spin) from Texas
Right to Life.

http://www.texasrighttolife.com/lifeIssues_euthanasia_bush.php

and more:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_Futile_Care_Law

http://www.baylorhealth.edu/proceedings/13_2/13_2_fine.html

President Bush told the world:

**Either you are with us or you are with the terrorists.**

These words hurt many pundits, reporters; The Democratic Part, hypocrites
and the enemies of USA.Those who are cozy with the terrorists suddenly
became an enemy of Bush. They must take sides. They just cannot be neutral
anymore.

Commentaries filled with anger directed at Bush's wisest choice of words and
the way he challenged among friends and neutral spectators; came from the
enemies of Bush, drive-by media, and all the hostile press which were
controlled and manipulated by the Dems.

President Bush then was alerting a secret-code to all over the world, and
only those who had studied that Codes will be able to understand it. He
rallied the greatest number of Armies unknown to the world since time
memorial, and up to this day, both the under-world and his enemies are still
sleeping. Which is why those criticisms against him were mostly gibberish
and erratic.

The Times didn't report whether
Wal-Mart CEO Lee Scott would see
a cap on his own compensation,

which totaled $17 million last year--

http://www.counterpunch.com/josh10192006.html
Capping Wages and Limiting Health Care
Wal-Mart Tightens the Squeeze on Workers
By JOSH GRYNIEWICZ

Wal-Mart,
the nation's largest private
employer with 1.4 million workers,
is leading the corporate attack on
wages and benefits with renewed vigor.

In spite of a recent "community-friendly"
public relations campaign aimed at repairing
its notorious reputation for low wages,
poor benefits and labor violations,
the company is putting an even tighter
squeeze on employees--

"...Caucuses and boards devoted to exploited children, as well as other
seemingly "youth development and protection" organizations, have been used
by the GOP and RELIGIOUS RIGHT to mask a pedophile and pederasty agenda. "

".........that the GOP for a number of years has used pipelines like the
HOUSE and SENATE PAGE SYSTEMS, political indoctrination organizations like
the COLLEGE REPUBLICANS, JUVENILE "DIVERSION PROGRAMS" and
RELIGIOUS-CONNECTED POLITICAL GROUPS like to groom young men for the
PREDATORY SEXUAL APPETITES OF OLDER MALE GOP members of Congress. The
Pennsylvania COLLEGE REPUBLICANS, founded by current Rep. Phil English with
the support of current Sen. Rick Santorum, appears to be one such
"recruitment" center."

SCROLL DOWN TO OCT 20-22.
http://waynemadsenreport.com/index.php

Lieberman gets mob money; Meyer Lansky, Gambino families.....

Latest names revealed of GOP pedos, and GOP closeted Gays in Congress......
(Look at that photo of English---looks like a pedo)

http://www.counterpunch.com/blum10202006.html

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/rosnerBlog.jhtml?itemNo=777942&contrassID=25&subContrassID...
Iran: What Americans want, what American Jews want

Those of you who read this blog frequently
probably know by now how fascinated am
I by polls.

(Since I'm not a politician,
I'm allowed to admit to having
such a weakness).

And this weekend,
I was fortunate enough as to have two
new interesting polls dealing with
issues with which I deal almost e
very day.

The first one is the annual
AJC survey for 2006.

The second is the PIPA poll titled
"What Kind of Foreign Policy Does
the American Public Want?"

The NYT blows a legal, effective, and classified program that was not
abused. Now, months later, their public editor comes to the conclusion
that it was legal, classified, and not abused. His excuse? The debil
made him do it, in the form of George Bush. Bush was mean to
them by pointing out at the time that the program was legal,
classified,
effective, and not abused.

The brute.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/22/opinion/22pubed.html?_r=3&pagewanted=2&n=Top%%...
----
My July 2 column strongly supported The Times's decision to publish
its June 23 article on a once-secret banking-data surveillance program.
After pondering for several months, I have decided I was off base.
There were reasons to publish the controversial article, but they were
slightly outweighed by two factors to which I gave too little emphasis.
While it's a close call now, as it was then, I don't think the
article should have been published.

Those two factors are really what bring me to this corrective
commentary: the apparent legality of the program in the United States,
and the absence of any evidence that anyone's private data had
actually...

http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/thermite_id_culprit_wtc_collapse.htm
Thermite Identified As Culprit Of WTC Collapse
Would have been hot enough to melt steel and cause implosion

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet.com | April 24 2006

A new branch of 9/11 research claims to have identified the cause of
the collapse of the twin towers. The photographic and video evidence
makes a very strong case for thermite being responsible for the
unprecedented implosions of steel framed reinforced buildings on
September 11.

This facet was first brought to light during a November 2005 appearance
on The Alex Jones Show by Brigham Young University physicist Professor
Steven Jones. Jones said that white phosphorous wasn't powerful enough
to cause the implosion but that thermite was the likely culprit. Alex
Jones's 2005 release Martial Law 9/11 Rise of the Police State
highlighted the physical evidence that the towers and Building 7 were
brought down with incendiary devices.

"Timo Makinen" hotmail.com>