| Re: LID funding for street cars |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.planning.transportation · Group Profile
Author: george conklingeorge conklin Date: Aug 17, 2007 11:47
> `
> News article from The (Portland) Oregonian - August 17, 2007
>
> No one mentioned it at the hearing Wednesday, but Holy Rosary Church
> near the Lloyd Center Mall was the largest opponent -- by far -- of a
> local improvement district to help pay for an eastside streetcar
> extension.
>
> Property owners in the district will pony up $15 million toward the $147
> million project if the Portland City Council approves the district next
> month, which appears likely.
>
> The city received formal objections, or "remonstrances," from property
> owners representing about $300,000 in assessments, or 2 percent of the
> $15 million bill.
>
> Many were industrial property owners who failed to see how the streetcar
> would benefit them. The largest of these was grain elevator operator
> Cargill, Inc., with an estimated assessment of $47,800.
>
> But the church, which owns 12 pieces of commercially zoned property in
> the district, faces a $125,621 bill for building the streetcar line.
>
> In objecting to the district, the church said the assessment was
> inequitable because it imposed an assessment on non-business property
> owners for the benefit of business owners.
>
> City officials responded that the assessment is based on the benefit the
> property derives from the streetcar, now and in the future -- not on
> benefits to any business currently operating on the property.
>
> Most property owners testified that they expected the streetcar to
> significantly boost their property values.
>
> The contribution by the property owners is considered one of the least
> controversial aspects of the plan to finance the streetcar line, which
> also includes $27 million in urban renewal money. The council is
> scheduled to vote on the LID formation and the urban renewal proposal
> Sept. 6.
>
You have to remember that street cars had their peak year in 1914, and
after that they were hard to keep operating and gradually went away of their
own dead weight. Those living along the streets where street cars ran were
happy to see them go, since they shook your entire house when they went by.
But if the city council wants projects to fund, then they will make housing
less and less affordable and even subvert urban renewal money in the
process.
|