alt.planning.misc
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.planning.misc only
 
Advanced search
August 2008
motuwethfrsasuw
    123 31
45678910 32
11121314151617 33
18192021222324 34
25262728293031 35
2008
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008      
total
alt.planning.misc Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  Crashes Are No Accident (was: Re: I saw Critical Mass)         


Author: Jym Dyer
Date: Aug 2, 2008 10:18

=v= I agree with BIG ONE here. "Accident" might describe a
number of collisions, but it not really an appropriate term to
describe all of them. It emphasizes nonintention, which is only
one aspect of the situation, and in many cases isn't accurate.

=v= I also think making the decision to drive a car in the first
place is an intentionality and that motorists should be held to
a greater degree of accountability for. But even without that
greater degree of accountability, it's still pretty easy to find
incidents for which "accident" is a wildly misleading term.

=v= Note that the term was introduced in this thread to describe
cars that run red lights, which is intentional behavior. Also,
for the recent incident in Seattle, note how the motorist tried
to wheedle about the unintended consequences of his intentional
acts to portray it as an "accident."
> THe NTSB (National Transportation Safety Board) investigates
> accidents!
Show full article (1.63Kb)
1 Comment