On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 18:26:49 -0600, Max Grrl
gmail.com>
wrote:
>In article
motzarella.org>, knoxy
>post.com> wrote:
>>> In article <261220061246507726%%maxtheangel@
gmail.com>,
>> maxtheangel@
gmail.com says...
>>> In article
motzarella.org>, knoxy
>>> post.com> wrote:
>>> >>>> In article <261220061103547141%%maxtheangel@
gmail.com>,
>>>> maxtheangel@
gmail.com says...
>>>>> In article
nntp.petitmorte.net>, ThePsyko
>>>>> itookmyprozac.com> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>> On 26 Dec 2006 I stormed the castle called alt.hackers.malicious and
>>>>>> heard the mekon cry out in
>>>>>> news:q7h2p21279lbmhj0b0g2s2sr097qv8tv2b@
4ax.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 26 Dec 2006 14:14:22 GMT, ThePsyko
itookmyprozac.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On 26 Dec 2006 in alt.hackers.malicious, knoxy
post.com> made
>>>>>>>>their contribution to mankind by stating in
>>>>>>>>news:MPG.1ffb34b9ee4fe9d898969c@motzarella.org:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article
hell.corn>,
>>>>>>>>> absurd_number_of_nicks@hell.corn says...>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 23:08:50 +0000, knoxy did the cha-cha, and
>>>>>>>>>> screamed:
>>>>>>>>>>> godofodd@statements.likeyours says...
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 18:35:32 +0000, the mekon did most oddly
>>>>>>>>>>>> state:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 05:50:45 GMT, Demon Lord of Confusion
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 04:16:13 +0000, Cardinal Snarky of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Fannish Inquisition attempted to confuse the issue further
>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>squeaking:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 19:55:51 -0600, Max Grrl sat in thee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Comfee Chaire, and didst finally confess, after taking
>> Muche
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tea:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 20:28:58 -0600, Max Grrl sat in thee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Comfee Chaire, and didst finally confess, after taking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Muche Tea:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the mekon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SP[BITCHSLAP]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, btw, I'm done playing with you . . . the Mekon
>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a pussy comic book character and I just really have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better things to do with my time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So solly cholly. : )
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, fair warning: You are lurching perilously close to a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kook award for your repetition of the above message --
>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other words, for spamming, and for proving that you
>> don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really have better things to do with your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm sorry if I broke usenet etiquette . . . I didn't
>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anyone else was really following this thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nuts to etiquette -- it was boring (repetitive), kooky
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (clearly demonstrating the opposite of its k'lame, and his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ownership of yourself), clueless (x-poasting it to such a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wide variety of groups, and to AUK, is an invitation to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> myself and my colleagues to give you the attention for
>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you are crying out) spam ("Excessive multi-posting",
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anyone?), only entertaining insofar as it was kooky, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that only because I'm a kookologist. Several flonkers and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kookologists, in fact, have been reading the thread, and
>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you don't get a seconded nomination soon, you may count
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yourself lucky.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And with the repetitive reply (which I just created to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> automatically execute in my Apple scripts), I was only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> giving him the intelligence and care (none) he deserved
>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being such a fucktard. Really wasn't talking to or
>> meaning
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to involve anyone else.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Jes' trollin', guv!" Sorry, but you missed his humour
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (because you were too busy getting snotty about his nick's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comic-book origins), as well, in addition to the fact that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _he_ trolled *you*, and for that, I must nominate you for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CNotM, if only to give Azure decent competition. For all
>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the stated reasons in this post, you are hereby nominated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for Clueless Newbie of the Month.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seconds?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Well, damnitall. Seconds?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll second her. She certainly deserves some reward and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> recognition for her actions and stupidity in the face of an
>>>>>>>>>>>>> obvious troll played purely for laughs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, but the seconding should probably come from someone
>>>>>>>>>>>> besides the troller, if only to prove there's real support for
>>>>>>>>>>>> the award...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'll second. She should spit out the hook, go buy a sense of
>>>>>>>>>>> humor and then learn how usenet works.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Speaking of hooks, I think it only meet to nominate Max Grrl for
>>>>>>>>>> the Bob Allisat Hook, Line & Sinker, on the basis of her
>> swallowing
>>>>>>>>>> a random hook dangled by "the mekon".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Seconds?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'll second it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Additionally, I think "the mekon" should get recognition for a
>> very
>>>>>>>>>> funny piece of work, and I therefore nominate him for the Pierre
>>>>>>>>>> Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker, most especially because he hooked
>> Max
>>>>>>>>>> without really trying, and entertained me from his very first
>> post.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Seconds?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'll second that too.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I find it hard to believe that all qualifies as an award winning
>>>>>>>>"troll".. if that's the case, I think half the morons who wander
>>>>>>>>through here during summer break are deserving of awards for their
>>>>>>>>trolling lol
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> reading between the lines i get "'come to ahm and troll to your
>>>>>>> hearts
>>>>>>> content as we have a long tradition and culture of biting on any
>>>>>>> baited hook, 'cause we believe everything posted, and we are just
>>>>>>> plain gullible."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> lol.. not sure where you got that from?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>But that's just my 2 cents :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> do you think your reply is enough to save your litle friend, max
>>>>>>> grrl,
>>>>>>> from the ignominy of winning an award or two for which she has
>>>>>>> worked
>>>>>>> so hard to win?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not my intention.. I'm just saying it wasn't my cup of tea as far as
>>>>>> trolls go. I thought the whole character was rather moronic
>>>>>
>>>>> I couldn't have said it better myself. THAT was my problem with the
>>>>> whole schtick. But apparently, some people think that kind of shit's
>>>>> funny.
>>>>>
>>>> Yeah, like people with a sense of humor.
>>> I have a sense of humour. I just prefer the kind with more intelligence
>>> behind it - you know, like fart jokes. : )
>>>
>> I'm sure you do. That would explain a lot.
>
>It does. If his gag had nearly as much intelligence as say, a guy
>getting hit in the nads with the prerequisite squeaky toy sound, I
>would have bit off. But it wasn't even THAT clever. : )
none the less i have you dangling on my ickle hook.
>>>>
>>>>> *shrugs*
>>>>> But then, I don't watch Fear Factor, Jackass or any of that other
>>>>> puerile shit. (though I guess that now makes me a tv snob, eh?)
>>>>>
>>>> I don't watch that either, but I don't have to go around telling people
>>>> that in a sad attempt to make me look all sophisticated and adult.
>>>> That's what makes you sound like a "tv snob".
>>>
>>> Oh!! I am SO sorry - I thought this was the fucking usenet and that it
>>> was all pretty much whatever the fuck goes, goes.
>>>
>>> My mistake! I didn't realize that there were rules dictating what could
>>> be said or thought!
>>>
>> Nor is there any rules dictating that others can't poke fun at your
>> posts, which is exactly what I did.
>*shrugs*
>Then we're even. As long as you fucking understand that where YOUR
>rights end is where mine begin.
>
>And no, you DIDN'T start out that way.
>>
>>> Listen, Buttercup, the same fucking thing that gives YOU the right to
>>> find a pile of shit funny is the SAME thing that gives ME the right to
>>> think it's fucking ST00PID.
>>>
>> Problems reading what I wrote?
>
>Are you having problems reading what _I_ wrote?
all the time as it happens. you make fuck all sence.
>>>>
>>>>>> (although I
>>>>>> would guess that the persona improved after the first few days if
>>>>>> people
>>>>>> found it an award winning performance - I stopped reading the threads
>>>>>> after I realized it was a sock that didn't interest me)
>>>>>
>>>>> I just got bored with it, but didn't feel like depriving the witless
>>>>> idiot posts to respond to (he seemed to be having so much fun), so I
>>>>> created a simple Apple script. It kept him entertained, gave him more
>>>>> "fodder" to blast, and I didn't have to spend more than 5 minutes to
>>>>> give that dubious joy.
>>>>>
>>>> Fucking spammer.
>>>
>>> Whatever. If I hadn't have scripted the lil fucktard, what else would
>>> you have done for entertainment? How else would you have gotten your
>>> jollies reading his ridiculous bullshit??
>>>
>> You still have no idea why what you did is considered spamming,
>> something that's considered abuse of the net and can get your account
>> pulled, do you?
>
>*sigh*
>Then get my account pulled. I'll just have to use my business' account
>then. No loss.
>>
>>>>
>>>>> And for being generous to an asshole, I get nominated for an award,
>>>>> that I could really give a shit less about.
>>>>>
>>>> You care so little that you have to post about it.
>>>
>>> Not really. I'm rather incapable of giving a shit about ANYTHING,
>>> Sweetie.
>>>
>> I can tell that from your posts, honey.
>Obviously not. You apparently think that I'm supposed to give a shit
>about getting some award.
>*shrugs*
>>
>>> Let me put this in as few of syllables as possible (so you can
>>> understand me without a fucking dictionary): The ONLY thing I find even
>>> close to being irritating is the "fact" that I'm supposed to be
>>> alarmed, upset, or really give a fuck-a-diddle-doo about an "award."
>>>
>> Somehow, you don't sound very convincing.
>Well it's the truth. Apparently, from everyone's posts, I'm supposed to
>be quaking in my boots, terribly hurt that I'm getting some dubious
>award.
>
>When in RL, it matters about as much as whether my dog shits in the
>grass or in the sand.
>>
>>> ANYONE giving a steel-plated shit about usenet awards is really
>>> something that I can't understand.
>>>
>> Yeah, why would anyone get upset about some silly award when they can
>> act like complete idiots over a really silly troll instead?
>>
>>> In the major scheme of life, what
>>> the fuck does it matter?? Will it affect my business? Um, nope. Will I
>>> lose my family over it?? Um, nope. Will I be forever incapable of
>>> posting again? Um . . nope. Will it somehow magically cause my
>>> wireless router to blow up, my Mac to die and my service provider to
>>> blink out of existence?? Um . . . wait! I know this one . . . NOPE.
>>> *shrugs*
>>>
>>> So really, in the scheme of things, what the fuck does it
>>> matter?????????
>>>
>> Just as much as a really obvious silly troll I guess. That didn't stop
>> you from having a hissy fit about it and then write a fucking script and
>> start spamming, just to show how much you didn't care.
>
>Wasn't having a hissy fit. I was BORED and felt like letting the lil
>fucktard talk to himself for a while.
>
>If you get out more often around people, you might learn the
>difference.
>
>Even our conversation right now is just a means of killing 15 minutes
>while I get feedback from a client.
>*shrugs*
>
>Meaning, it doesn't impact my life either way. It's just marginally
>better than reading a novel - or just hitting the can.
>
>But you still didn't answer my question about what impact the award
>will have on my life, LOL.
>
>Once you can wrap your mind around that, you'll see why this whole
>NONissue isn't worth worrying about. : )
so why haven't you spat the hook yet?
>>> So have fun, Kid, go ahead and nominate me for every single usenet
>>> award in existence. I'll even second ALL nominations. : )
>>>>
>>>>> So, I'LL "second" the vote, too.
>>>>> *shrugs*
>>>>> It's not really like it means ANYTHING, LOL. : ) It's not like I'm a
>>>>> hacker or anything of the sort. To the normal everyday average person,
>>>>> a CNOTM award means less than shit.
>>>>>
>>>> You not being a hacker isn't exactly surprising, you'd have to have at
>>>> least an inkling of a clue and you keep on proving exactly how fucking
>>>> clueless you are.
>>>
>>> You know, really, I'm not a hacker or anything close. The only thing I
>>> possibly can claim is being an artist, a Mac Geek and a psychopath.
>>>
>> You, a psychopath? I believe you.
>Well, that's what my shrink tells me. I have no conscience (rather, one
>with "holes"), I don't care about anyone, like to hurt people . . .
>shall I go on?
>
>Or should I google it for you?
>>
>> Oh! Btw, I'm the queen of Sweden. Really. I am.
>Hmmm . . . been to Sweden. The people there were intelligent,
>considerate, and cultured.
>
>You were adopted, weren't you?
>>
>>> And to be blunt, a "usenet award" affects neither of those things, nor
>>> affects my bottom line with my studio.
>>> *shrugs*
>>>
>> You have such a funny way of showing how much you don't care about
>> things.
>
>LOL, once more the intelligence impaired, I'm bored. And this is kinda
>fun. : )
>
>Okay, I have 13 minutes and counting . . . soooo . . . what can I do
>to prove you, all knowing psychic, that I don't give a shit?
>
>How bout this: nominate me for the worst fucking award in the world and
>see if I don't second it. : )
>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> its not like i didn't give enough clues i was trolling or anything.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, the fact that it was a troll was pretty obvious..
>>>>> Yeah, but it was a RETARDED troll. : ) But mainly annoying.
>>>>>
>>>> So you don't know how to use a killfile or just ignore what you find
>>>> annoying, you don't know what constitutes spamming, so what more
>>>> evidence do we need of your cluelessnes?
>>>
>>> Um . . . okay. I'll buy that.
>>>
>>> Am I to assume, though, that you, apparently being so much more
>>> clued-in than me, are too fucking st00pid to use a killfile, too????
>>>
>> Why would I want to use a killfile? You're not annoying me, I find you
>> highly amusing.
>
>Ditto.
masochist.
>>>>
>>>>> Now, if he pretending to be like, fucking McCain or something, that
>>>>> might have been clever - someone that might actually be believable . .
>>>>> . . but to pretend to be a wussy comic book villain?? Please.
>>>>>
>>>> FFS woman! SPIT OUT THE HOOK!!!
>>>
>>> First off, Sweetie, I wasn't talking to you, I was talking to
>>> ThePsycho. But I'm not gonna get my panties in a twist because you're
>>> answering me . . .
>>>
>> So why bring it up? Oh, that's right, it's to show that you really
>> really don't care...
>
>Um . . . because ThePsycho, whom I happen to like quite a bit,
the slurpfests makes that obvious.
>mentioned exactly what I had been thinking about the whole thing. So I
>answered him.
>*shrugs*
>
>So if he posts something like "it's a nice day out" and I answer "yeah,
>it is" is THAT supposed to imply that I was REALLY concerned about the
>weather?????
>
>If so, get a life. PLEASE.
>>
>>> mainly because I know this is usenet and we can,
>>> well, pretty much do whatever the fuck we want.
>>>
>> Well, except for committing net abuse, like spamming.
>
>Well, we covered that already I do believe. And I said I'm sorry for
>SPAMMING (though I've seen many, many people use "bots" and brag about
>it - and seem to think that it's cool).
>
>But if your panties are in a twist, feel free to have my account pulled.
>
>Though, I'd bet you $100 they won't.
>>
>>> Don't see how that's a "hook" though. Considering that I never thought
>>> the lil fucktard was REALLY an alien, LOL. I just figured he was either
>>> a nutj0b or fucktard.
>>>
>> What was it you wrote in another post about the mekon troll?
>> "My ish with the lil fucktard is that he came off as a nutj0b who quite
>> possibly believed his own shit.", wasn't it?
>Yeah, I think he's a fucktard. So? And can I see him believing his own
>shit? Yeah, I can. Kinda what fucktards do, isn't it?
>
>B00b&Crawl think he's personally closed 150 pedo groups and I call HIM
>a fucktard . . . not only cause he's a racist asswipe, but because he
>also seems to believe his own hype.
>
>Does that mean he's trolling me?
>
>> Didn't you write a fucking
>> script to reply to all his posts?
>Yep, Guilty. Never done it before - wanted to see if I could (Apple
>makes it extremely easy though). And figured he was so hyped into
>responding to me, that I'd let him play a while longer.
>
>Once I found out that his alien BS was based on a st00pid comic book
>character (who's about as badassed as my niece's "Hello Kitty Jedi"
>character that she made up) I lost respect for him. I was having fun at
>first, too. And then it just got . . . . ridiculous.
those fucking meowers, they never take anything seriously. someone
should netKKKop them. yeah. netKKKop them good. that'd learn 'em
propper.
>> Didn't you, after writing about how he
>> wasn't worthy of your attention, kept talking about him in several
>> posts?
>When asked or responding to someone I was talking about BEFORE I
>started scripting him, yes.
>
>Or was I just supposed to ignore everyone talking about him? People I
>had started convos with earlier?
>> Nope, you weren't trolled at all.
>*shrugs*
>
>If I was in fact trolled by the lil goober, then I've been trolled by
>better. By Hat.
which doesn't detract from the fact you are trolled and still are.
noone with a brain gets trolled by mat, you grab hold of him, flame
him and hope he flames you back, which he never does, then watch him
run away. its the way things always have been with regard to him.
>>>>> Hat's trolls are WAY funnier . . . this guy has a lot to learn about
>>>>> being funny in his trolling.
>>>>>
>>>> The fun part was watching you get all worked up over a silly troll and
>>>> even funnier, you're still worked up about it, which you just proved.
>>>
>>> Didn't get worked up, Sweetie. He was fun for a while . . . then he got
>>> boring. So I scripted a response just to keep him amused.
>>>
>> Again, you wrote a fucking script just for him. That's hilarious!
>How so??? Because I took five minutes out of my life??????
>
>Jeez, so if the script took 10 minutes, it would like, mean, I love him
>or something?????
>>
>>> But I'm SO glad YOU had fun, Sweetie. Maybe some time, I'll invite you
>>> over for a playdate with my 2 yo niece. You guys can play Candyland or
>>> something and have even more fun! ; )
>>>
>> You must be a very insecure person since you feel a need to point out
>> how much more mature and intelligent you are all the time. You should
>> talk to your shrink about it, I'm sure s/he could help you with that.
>
>No, I'm just calling it like I see it. And just trying to equate your
>idea of usenet fun with RL fun.
good luck with that and please let us know how you got on with it.
>>> And once again (for the intelligence impaired, such as yourself), the
>>> ONLY thing I got "worked up" about is the fact that I'm presumably
>>> supposed to give a shit about some award (good or bad, really, who the
>>> fuck cares???). Again, what the fuck impact will it have on my life???
>>> Oh, yeah, I forgot, it WON'T hurt my business, it WON'T ruin my family.
>>> It WON'T cut me off from usenet, and it WON'T blow up my Mac.
>>>
>>> Oh yeah, that award will KILL me, right?
>>> *rolls eyes*
>>>
>> Calm down, I don't want such a mature person as yourself to get a heart
>> attack over a silly usenet award.
>
>Sorry. I just thought I'd spend the same amount of time and trouble
>that you all are on this whole award thing. : )
>>
>>> At the risk of offending the people here whom I like (and they know who
>>> they are), giving such a shit about an award is kinda like worrying
>>> about a fucking hangnail on a limb they just amputated. Kinda small and
>>> pathetic in the great scheme of things.
>>>
>>> Sorry : )
>>>
>>> But if it will help validate your existence or make you feel that life
>>> is worth living, I'll go ahead and second any other nominations you
>>> feel the desperate need to nominate me for. : )
>>>
>> Wow, that's mighty nice of you, especially since I haven't nominated you
>> for anything. I wouldn't be surprised if someone nominates you for the
>> drama queen one though if you go on like this.
>
>Why? Because I really don't give a silver plated shit like everyone
>seems to think I should??
>
>That's what I find most irritating. I guess the best way to go about it
>would be to simply ask "WTF should I care?"
>Better?
wwjd? vote new labour.
>>>>>> I didn't catch on
>>>>>> that it was a sock for a few days though lol
>>>>> Really? A sock?
>>>>>
>>>> Well, duh!
>>>
>>> Wow! Never heard the sound of sarcasm rushing past a pointy lil head
>>> sound THAT loud, before. You must be TRULY sped-cial.
>>
>>
>> rocky was right about the flathead remark he made about you.
>
>I figured he was a sock for someone, Hon. Was just making the point
>that you didn't recognize sarcasm even when it was smacking you in the
>face.
>>
>>>>
>>>>> I was thinking more like a pair of well-used, unwashed, pee-stained
>>>>> underroos. ; )
>>>>>
>>>> Again, SPIT OUT THE FUCKING HOOK YOU SAD PATHETIC WOMAN!
>>> LOL, what "hook???" You are really amusing . . . I must find more
>>> fucktards like you!! : )
>>>
>> You mean fucktards that laugh at you being trolled? Shouldn't be too
>> hard.
>Um. Am I supposed to be hurt by that??
>
>Will you let me know if I am?
>>
>>>>
>>>> And stop fantasizing about my man and underwear.
>>> You WISH I was fantasizing about "your man" and his underroos. Sadly,
>>> as an adult, I go for REAL men. : )
>>>
>> Are you sure you're not just trying to slurp them on usenet?
>
>Are you serious???????? LOL
>Can I use that in my sig??? : )
>>
>>>> He has way to good
>>>> taste to go for someone like you.
>>> Not if you're the standard he goes by.
>>> *shrugs*
>>>
>> Awwww... I'm so hurt.
>Aww . . . sorry. I guess that means you trolled me, too, huh? : )
