In article
motzarella.org>, knoxy
post.com> wrote:
>> In article
motzarella.org>, knoxy
>> post.com> wrote:
>> >>> In article <261220061246507726%%maxtheangel@
gmail.com>,
>>> maxtheangel@
gmail.com says...
>>>> In article
motzarella.org>, knoxy
>>>> post.com> wrote:
>>>> >>>>> In article <261220061103547141%%maxtheangel@
gmail.com>,
>>>>> maxtheangel@
gmail.com says...
>>>>>> In article
nntp.petitmorte.net>,
>>>>>> ThePsyko
>>>>>> itookmyprozac.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 26 Dec 2006 I stormed the castle called alt.hackers.malicious
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> heard the mekon cry out in
>>>>>>> news:q7h2p21279lbmhj0b0g2s2sr097qv8tv2b@
4ax.com...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 26 Dec 2006 14:14:22 GMT, ThePsyko
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On 26 Dec 2006 in alt.hackers.malicious, knoxy
post.com>> made
>>>>>>>>>their contribution to mankind by stating in
>>>>>>>>>news:MPG.1ffb34b9ee4fe9d898969c@
motzarella.org:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In article
hell.corn>,
>>>>>>>>>> absurd_number_of_nicks@hell.corn says...>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 23:08:50 +0000, knoxy did the cha-cha,
> and
>>>>>>>>>>> screamed:
>>>>>>>>>>>> godofodd@statements.likeyours says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 18:35:32 +0000, the mekon did most
> oddly
>>>>>>>>>>>>> state:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 05:50:45 GMT, Demon Lord of
> Confusion
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 04:16:13 +0000, Cardinal Snarky of
> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Fannish Inquisition attempted to confuse the issue
> further
>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>squeaking:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 19:55:51 -0600, Max Grrl sat in
> thee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Comfee Chaire, and didst finally confess, after taking
>>> Muche
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tea:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 20:28:58 -0600, Max Grrl sat in
> thee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Comfee Chaire, and didst finally confess, after
> taking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Muche Tea:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the mekon wrote:
{snipped for length]
>> Obviously not. You apparently think that I'm supposed to give a shit
>> about getting some award.
>> *shrugs*
>>
> Um, telling you that you do seem to care a helluva lot based on your
> post = thinking that you should care?
I simply didn't see WHY I should care. Nothing more, nothing less. You
all seemed to care (quite a lot) - pardon moi for not seeing the
overall point or purpose. Pardon moi for thinking that the whole awards
thing was fucktarded to begin with.
Yeah, I've been on usenet maybe, what? A year in dribbles and drabs?
When I'm in town or not otherwise engaged.
> So, you have a problem with reading comprehension skills,
Nope.
> killfiles
Nope.
> and/or selfcontrol enough to ignore what annoys you on usenet,
Sometimes. Depends. If I AM annoyed, I usually annoy right back.
> spamming,
Didn't mean to.
> spitting out hooks
Ahhh
*opens mouth wide*
. . . no hook, sorry.
> fooling anyone that you don't care etc.
Don't care. Was kinda wondering why YOU all cared.
Seriously, No ranting, no raving. No being insulting. WTF does anyone
care? Really? Why do YOU all care?? What the fuck is the point?
I've seen many people nominated for this and that (good and bad) and to
me, it's just foolish. Pointless.
> Come on, who
> really wrote that script?
Just me. : ) I'm a complete Mac geek. : )
> It can't have been you since it's amazing if
> you've figured out how to use a lightswitch without coaching.
Enh, I do okay - macs. art, anything graphic. ; )
>
>>>> Let me put this in as few of syllables as possible (so you can
>>>> understand me without a fucking dictionary): The ONLY thing I find even
>>>> close to being irritating is the "fact" that I'm supposed to be
>>>> alarmed, upset, or really give a fuck-a-diddle-doo about an "award."
>>>>
>>> Somehow, you don't sound very convincing.
>> Well it's the truth. Apparently, from everyone's posts, I'm supposed to
>> be quaking in my boots, terribly hurt that I'm getting some dubious
>> award.
>>
>> When in RL, it matters about as much as whether my dog shits in the
>> grass or in the sand.
>>
> I know it doesn't matter in RL, I'm sure Snarky does as well, I know
> "the mekon" doesn't give a shit either way, hell, I bet most people
> knows it doesn't matter in RL, yet you sound really upset.
Nope. Just don't get what the big deal is. Hence my asking "why the
fuck it should matter to me since I'm not losing my family, ruining my
business, etc."
> Are you
> stomping your iddly widdly feet everytime you post about how little it
> matters and how you don't care and that you're absolutely not upset
> about it?
Nope, just don't get why it matters to YOU all so much that you guys
make such a big deal over it. Not just this time with lil ol me . . .
but with others I've seen.
>
>>>> ANYONE giving a steel-plated shit about usenet awards is really
>>>> something that I can't understand.
>>>>
>>> Yeah, why would anyone get upset about some silly award when they can
>>> act like complete idiots over a really silly troll instead?
>>>
>>>> In the major scheme of life, what
>>>> the fuck does it matter?? Will it affect my business? Um, nope. Will I
>>>> lose my family over it?? Um, nope. Will I be forever incapable of
>>>> posting again? Um . . nope. Will it somehow magically cause my
>>>> wireless router to blow up, my Mac to die and my service provider to
>>>> blink out of existence?? Um . . . wait! I know this one . . . NOPE.
>>>> *shrugs*
>>>>
>>>> So really, in the scheme of things, what the fuck does it
>>>> matter?????????
>>>>
>>> Just as much as a really obvious silly troll I guess. That didn't stop
>>> you from having a hissy fit about it and then write a fucking script and
>>> start spamming, just to show how much you didn't care.
>>
>> Wasn't having a hissy fit. I was BORED and felt like letting the lil
>> fucktard talk to himself for a while.
>>
> I'll let you in on a little secret. It's a really well kept one here on
> usenet so don't pass it on. If someone "BORED" you on usenet and you
> want to let them talk to themselves, don't reply to them, don't write
> scripts to do your replying for you, don't even acknowledge their
> existence. It's actually quite easy.
Then he wouldn't have had anyone to respond to. It was funny watching
him reply to scripts.
And actually, I only watched for two. I might have to go back and see
what else he said. : )
>
>> If you get out more often around people, you might learn the
>> difference.
>>
> You mean that when you get bored with someone when you get out, you
> write big notes to them instead of talking to them?
If I have no respect for them, I might mess with them a little. Depends
on how much I don't respect them. If I'm ambivalent, I walk away.
*shrugs*
> Otherwise, I don't
> really see how getting out more often around around people have anything
> to do with you writing scripts to do your replying for you on usenet.
No, you missed my point, I was bored, wanted to know how to do it and
used him, 'cause he was annoying me (not with his responses per se -
just the overall alien schtick).
>
>> Even our conversation right now is just a means of killing 15 minutes
>> while I get feedback from a client.
>> *shrugs*
>>
>> Meaning, it doesn't impact my life either way. It's just marginally
>> better than reading a novel - or just hitting the can.
>>
> Oh no! A sophisticated mature woman like you prefer usenet to reading a
> novel. Tell me it ain't so.
: )
>
>> But you still didn't answer my question about what impact the award
>> will have on my life, LOL.
>>
> How the hell would I know what impact it would have on your life and
> what makes you think I care? I just amuse myself by poking fun at you.
Vice-versa. To me, making such a big deal about whether or not someone
gets ANY award (unless it comes with $$ or a press release) is every
bit as amusing.
>
>> Once you can wrap your mind around that, you'll see why this whole
>> NONissue isn't worth worrying about. : )
>>
> And maybe then you'll stop whining about it?
Not whining. Whining would be (stay with me here): "Aw, please, guys
don't gib me dat mean ol award."
I'm sincerely trying to understand what the fucks the big deal.
>
>>>> So have fun, Kid, go ahead and nominate me for every single usenet
>>>> award in existence. I'll even second ALL nominations. : )
>>>>>
>>>>>> So, I'LL "second" the vote, too.
>>>>>> *shrugs*
>>>>>> It's not really like it means ANYTHING, LOL. : ) It's not like I'm a
>>>>>> hacker or anything of the sort. To the normal everyday average
>>>>>> person,
>>>>>> a CNOTM award means less than shit.
>>>>>>
>>>>> You not being a hacker isn't exactly surprising, you'd have to have
>>>>> at
>>>>> least an inkling of a clue and you keep on proving exactly how
>>>>> fucking
>>>>> clueless you are.
>>>>
>>>> You know, really, I'm not a hacker or anything close. The only thing I
>>>> possibly can claim is being an artist, a Mac Geek and a psychopath.
>>>>
>>> You, a psychopath? I believe you.
>> Well, that's what my shrink tells me. I have no conscience (rather, one
>> with "holes"), I don't care about anyone, like to hurt people . . .
>> shall I go on?
>>
> Maybe you should just ask your shrink to get a better education.
PhDs are pretty good I think. : )
>
>> Or should I google it for you?
>>
> No, but maybe you should do it for yourself. Nothing of what you
> described there means you're a psychopath,
Did you want to see my last test scores? No?
Meaning, just because I don't give out ALL my symptoms doesn't mean a
damn thing. Unless you happen to be a psychiatrist?
If so, do you accept Blue Cross & Blue Shield Fed?
> not that it matters on usenet
> anyway. If you have a conscience, even with holes in it, you're likely
> not a psychopath.
No, we're rare, but we do exist. I'm one of the lucky ones. Most don't
have any conscience at all.
> You say you don't care about anyone, psychopaths care
> about someone, themselves.
EVERYONE cares about themselves. Kinda of a non-point, you know?
> You like to hurt people, so fucking what?
I have vicious desires to hurt people. Like an addiction but harder to
treat. : )
Kinda like I fantasize about it, you know?
> The
> world is full of people who like to cause others as much pain as
> possible, that's doesn't necessary mean they're psychopaths.
No, but most possibly are.
But for the record, why the fuck would I say I'm a psychopath if I'm
not?? Do you think it's fun to want to hurt people on a daily basis? To
feel nothing inside? When a family member dies, to not be able to give
a damn, and have to fake it so no one knows?
Do you have any idea how much I WISH I could feel? How much I wish I
could've given a flying fuck when my husband's father died? Or how
about how it feels to see people like YOU walking around FEELING good,
bad, happy, sad, etc?
If you think I'm making up about being a psychopath (and believe me,
there are more of us than you think), yeah, I wish to fucking Gawd you
were right. That is, if I actually believed in him. : )
>
>>> Oh! Btw, I'm the queen of Sweden. Really. I am.
>> Hmmm . . . been to Sweden. The people there were intelligent,
>> considerate, and cultured.
>>
> I know, we don't really care all that much for fart jokes.
You can't enjoy a good fart joke? Hmmm . . . I can.
But then I also enjoy Shakespeare's humor, Eddie Izzard, Lewis Black,
and Monty Python.
Oh, and Distorted View.
>
>> You were adopted, weren't you?
>>
>
> Are you implying that I'm not intelligent, considerate and cultured? I'm
> so gutted I don't think I can continue posting to usenet.
Enh, it was a potshot.
>
>>>> And to be blunt, a "usenet award" affects neither of those things, nor
>>>> affects my bottom line with my studio.
>>>> *shrugs*
>>>>
>>> You have such a funny way of showing how much you don't care about
>>> things.
>>
>> LOL, once more the intelligence impaired, I'm bored. And this is kinda
>> fun. : )
>>
>> Okay, I have 13 minutes and counting . . . soooo . . . what can I do
>> to prove you, all knowing psychic, that I don't give a shit?
>>
> How about stop whining about how much you don't care. That would be the
> easiest and fastest way to prove that you don't give a shit.
Doesn't matter - I really don't give a shit.
If I couldn't give a tin-plated shit about people in my family dying,
wtf would I give a shit about THIS?
Yeah, you could possibly construe my reactions to giving a shit, but
you'd be wrong. : (
>
>> How bout this: nominate me for the worst fucking award in the world and
>> see if I don't second it. : )
>>
> You really think that would prove anything? I still think my idea is
> better.
But I'd still be bored.
>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> its not like i didn't give enough clues i was trolling or
> anything.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, the fact that it was a troll was pretty obvious..
>>>>>> Yeah, but it was a RETARDED troll. : ) But mainly annoying.
>>>>>>
>>>>> So you don't know how to use a killfile or just ignore what you find
>>>>> annoying, you don't know what constitutes spamming, so what more
>>>>> evidence do we need of your cluelessnes?
>>>>
>>>> Um . . . okay. I'll buy that.
>>>>
>>>> Am I to assume, though, that you, apparently being so much more
>>>> clued-in than me, are too fucking st00pid to use a killfile, too????
>>>>
>>> Why would I want to use a killfile? You're not annoying me, I find you
>>> highly amusing.
>>
>> Ditto.
>>
> Let me try this again. Me pointing out that you obviously don't know how
> to use a killfile when you find something annoying made you believe I'm
> "too fucking st00pid to use a killfile, too".
If you look at it, it was kinda like PKB.
See, you're taking the view that responding to me is fun and amuses you
(therefore you're not using a killfile). Strangely enough, I felt the
same way. Responding to this award shit was amusing me. : )
> Me asking why I would want
> to use one when I don't find something annoying makes you say "Ditto".
Cause even if I'm annoyed, or bored, it's still kinda amusing.
> There's something wrong with that picture and you being all intelligent
> and mature and stuff could probably work out where you lost the plot.
LOL didn't say I was mature.
>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Now, if he pretending to be like, fucking McCain or something, that
>>>>>> might have been clever - someone that might actually be believable
>>>>>> . .
>>>>>> . . but to pretend to be a wussy comic book villain?? Please.
>>>>>>
>>>>> FFS woman! SPIT OUT THE HOOK!!!
>>>>
>>>> First off, Sweetie, I wasn't talking to you, I was talking to
>>>> ThePsycho. But I'm not gonna get my panties in a twist because you're
>>>> answering me . . .
>>>>
>>> So why bring it up? Oh, that's right, it's to show that you really
>>> really don't care...
>>
>> Um . . . because ThePsycho, whom I happen to like quite a bit,
>> mentioned exactly what I had been thinking about the whole thing. So I
>> answered him.
>> *shrugs*
>>
> Oh for gods sake! Am I going to have to go through all the posts word by
> word with you for you to understand the simplest things?
> Ok, here we go,
> I said "FFS woman! SPIT OUT THE HOOK!!!"
>
> You said "First off, Sweetie, I wasn't talking to you, I was talking to
> ThePsycho. But I'm not gonna get my panties in a twist because you're
> answering me . . ."
>
> Then I said " So why bring it up? Oh, that's right, it's to show that
> you really really don't care..."
>
> So you came up with this little nugget " Um . . . because ThePsycho,
> whom I happen to like quite a bit,mentioned exactly what I had been
> thinking about the whole thing. So I answered him."
>
> Now would you care to explain what that last bit had to do with my
> question?
Okay, how about this . . .
Everyone made such a huge fucking deal over giving me an award (still
don't get the importance of it, and why I should care but I'll let that
slip) so TP comes out and says exactly what I had been thinking (okay,
so he didn't go out and script shit in response) - so I chimed in,
telling HIM that yeah, that's exactly what I had been thinking at the
time.
Then YOU ask me why I care if I brought it up. With the lil "oh yeah"
bit, and I said, I DIDN'T bring it up, TP did. So I made a simple
comment.
It doesn't sound that confusing to me.
>
>> So if he posts something like "it's a nice day out" and I answer "yeah,
>> it is" is THAT supposed to imply that I was REALLY concerned about the
>> weather?????
>>
> Only in your own little world on your own little usenet where you don't
> really get what other people are posting.
That makes no sense . . . so if TP and I talk about the weather, I'm
not getting what he's posting??
>
>> If so, get a life. PLEASE.
>>
> I have one thankyouverymuch.
>
>>>> mainly because I know this is usenet and we can,
>>>> well, pretty much do whatever the fuck we want.
>>>>
>>> Well, except for committing net abuse, like spamming.
>>
>> Well, we covered that already I do believe. And I said I'm sorry for
>> SPAMMING (though I've seen many, many people use "bots" and brag about
>> it - and seem to think that it's cool).
>>
> Ah, so it's ok if some netabusing fuckhead thinks it's cool?
Dunno. The guy I know personally who does it is funny as hell.
>
>> But if your panties are in a twist, feel free to have my account pulled.
>>
> Keep spamming and you'll get it done yourself, no help from me. I don't
> netcop people, not even the eternally clueless ones like yourself.
>
>> Though, I'd bet you $100 they won't.
>>
> So you're with a crap ISP then? The good ones let you get away with
> abuse on the net but not abuse of the net. I doubt you understand the
> difference.
I understand the difference. My ISP gives me the access and could
really give a shit less about the rest. As long as I don't complain and
I pay on time.
>
>>>> Don't see how that's a "hook" though. Considering that I never thought
>>>> the lil fucktard was REALLY an alien, LOL. I just figured he was either
>>>> a nutj0b or fucktard.
>>>>
>>> What was it you wrote in another post about the mekon troll?
>>> "My ish with the lil fucktard is that he came off as a nutj0b who quite
>>> possibly believed his own shit.", wasn't it?
>> Yeah, I think he's a fucktard. So? And can I see him believing his own
>> shit? Yeah, I can. Kinda what fucktards do, isn't it?
>>
> Have you met a lot of fucktards on usenet who really think they're
> little green aliens from a comic book?
Met one who thought he was God. Really. Does that count?
>
>> B00b&Crawl think he's personally closed 150 pedo groups and I call HIM
>> a fucktard . . . not only cause he's a racist asswipe, but because he
>> also seems to believe his own hype.
>>
>> Does that mean he's trolling me?
>>
> You don't really see the difference between that and someone posting as
> a green alien from a comic book? Damn, you're beyond clueless!
They both believe (or possibly, in Mekon's case) believe their own
hype. Yeah, to me, just believing your own shit makes one a fucktard.
>
>>> Didn't you write a fucking
>>> script to reply to all his posts?
>> Yep, Guilty. Never done it before - wanted to see if I could (Apple
>> makes it extremely easy though). And figured he was so hyped into
>> responding to me, that I'd let him play a while longer.
>>
> So, first you said it was because you wanted to show him "the care he
> deserves (none)" and now it's because he was so hyped into responding to
> you... uh-huh, I believe you.
Yep. The scripting took about five minutes of my time, and I really put
no thought into the actual post, but he kept responding to it.
And honestly, I have no idea when he figured out it wasn't a real
response. So yeah, I laughed about that.
Personally, I would have realized that it was a "bot" after two posts .
. . but he didn't seem to. So, yeah, I found that amusing.
>
>> Once I found out that his alien BS was based on a st00pid comic book
>> character (who's about as badassed as my niece's "Hello Kitty Jedi"
>> character that she made up) I lost respect for him. I was having fun at
>> first, too. And then it just got . . . . ridiculous.
>>
> I see, so what really got to you was the fact that he was having some
> lighthearted fun instead of pretending to be some 'really cool badass'
> comic character? Keep digging honey.
Nope. What "got to me" was the fact that he pushing the gag beyond the
funny quotient. Then it started seeming like he believed his own shit -
or was just dragging a joke to death.
Sorta like this:
"Knock-knock"
"Who's there"
"Banana"
"Banana who?"
"Knock-knock"
"Who's there"
"Banana"
"Banana who?"
"Knock-knock"
"Who's there"
"Banana"
"Banana who?"
"Knock-knock"
"Who's there"
"Orange"
"Orange who?"
"Orange you glad I didn't say 'banana?'"
See what I mean?
>
>>> Didn't you, after writing about how he
>>> wasn't worthy of your attention, kept talking about him in several
>>> posts?
>> When asked or responding to someone I was talking about BEFORE I
>> started scripting him, yes.
>>
> If you're going to rewrite history, at least make sure it's not archived
> first.
LOL, I'm not rewriting history that I know of.
>
>> Or was I just supposed to ignore everyone talking about him? People I
>> had started convos with earlier?
>>
> See above.
See above.
>
>>> Nope, you weren't trolled at all.
>> *shrugs*
>>
>> If I was in fact trolled by the lil goober, then I've been trolled by
>> better. By Hat.
>>
> So basically what you're saying is that you're easily trolled.
Nope, I would say this is possibly the second.
But what YOU see as trolled, I see as just not finding the schtick
funny and trying to annoy him right back.
> That's
> ok, you're not the only one on usenet.
>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hat's trolls are WAY funnier . . . this guy has a lot to learn
>>>>>> about
>>>>>> being funny in his trolling.
>>>>>>
>>>>> The fun part was watching you get all worked up over a silly troll
>>>>> and
>>>>> even funnier, you're still worked up about it, which you just proved.
>>>>
>>>> Didn't get worked up, Sweetie. He was fun for a while . . . then he got
>>>> boring. So I scripted a response just to keep him amused.
>>>>
>>> Again, you wrote a fucking script just for him. That's hilarious!
>> How so??? Because I took five minutes out of my life??????
>>
> Yes.
I take more time out of my life than that for amusement.
>
>> Jeez, so if the script took 10 minutes, it would like, mean, I love him
>> or something?????
>>
> Well, you did seem to have some weird fantasies about him, sex and
> bananas...
Not really. I DID have a few insults regarding him, his undies and
bananas.
>
>>>> But I'm SO glad YOU had fun, Sweetie. Maybe some time, I'll invite you
>>>> over for a playdate with my 2 yo niece. You guys can play Candyland or
>>>> something and have even more fun! ; )
>>>>
>>> You must be a very insecure person since you feel a need to point out
>>> how much more mature and intelligent you are all the time. You should
>>> talk to your shrink about it, I'm sure s/he could help you with that.
>>
>> No, I'm just calling it like I see it. And just trying to equate your
>> idea of usenet fun with RL fun.
>>
> What for? You're the one who's trying to convince us that your RL isn't
> effected by something that happens on usenet. I don't have a problem
> separating the two.
Neither do I. Once more, just didn't understand why YOU all felt that
an award, however imaginary, was such a big fucking deal.
Seen other people nominated for shit like that and just thought it was
a waste of time. Even seen TP do it, and thought "why???"
>
>>>> And once again (for the intelligence impaired, such as yourself), the
>>>> ONLY thing I got "worked up" about is the fact that I'm presumably
>>>> supposed to give a shit about some award (good or bad, really, who the
>>>> fuck cares???). Again, what the fuck impact will it have on my life???
>>>> Oh, yeah, I forgot, it WON'T hurt my business, it WON'T ruin my family.
>>>> It WON'T cut me off from usenet, and it WON'T blow up my Mac.
>>>>
>>>> Oh yeah, that award will KILL me, right?
>>>> *rolls eyes*
>>>>
>>> Calm down, I don't want such a mature person as yourself to get a heart
>>> attack over a silly usenet award.
>>
>> Sorry. I just thought I'd spend the same amount of time and trouble
>> that you all are on this whole award thing. : )
>>
> Seeing as I don't put in anymore time and trouble than it took me to
> write that I second the nominations, you don't seem to be doing a very
> good job.
I'm having fun. Doesn't that matter?
And no, you ARE putting in quite a bit of time on this . . . I would
think that these posts are kinda illustrating that, don't you??
>
>>>> At the risk of offending the people here whom I like (and they know who
>>>> they are), giving such a shit about an award is kinda like worrying
>>>> about a fucking hangnail on a limb they just amputated. Kinda small and
>>>> pathetic in the great scheme of things.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry : )
>>>>
>>>> But if it will help validate your existence or make you feel that life
>>>> is worth living, I'll go ahead and second any other nominations you
>>>> feel the desperate need to nominate me for. : )
>>>>
>>> Wow, that's mighty nice of you, especially since I haven't nominated you
>>> for anything. I wouldn't be surprised if someone nominates you for the
>>> drama queen one though if you go on like this.
>>
>> Why? Because I really don't give a silver plated shit like everyone
>> seems to think I should??
>>
> No, because of the way you're whining about it.
Whining and wondering why the fuck I'm supposed to care are two
different things.
>
>> That's what I find most irritating. I guess the best way to go about it
>> would be to simply ask "WTF should I care?"
>> Better?
>>
> Even better would have been to ignore it completely, but I don't think
> you would know how to.
Probably not. I'm probably making this "worse."
But once again, I don't give a shit. But of course, my not caring that
I'm making this worse means I'm whining, right? ; )
>
>>>>>>> I didn't catch on
>>>>>>> that it was a sock for a few days though lol
>>>>>> Really? A sock?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Well, duh!
>>>>
>>>> Wow! Never heard the sound of sarcasm rushing past a pointy lil head
>>>> sound THAT loud, before. You must be TRULY sped-cial.
>>>
>>>
>>> rocky was right about the flathead remark he made about you.
>>
>> I figured he was a sock for someone, Hon. Was just making the point
>> that you didn't recognize sarcasm even when it was smacking you in the
>> face.
>>
>
>
> I give up, you're really too stupid to get it.
No, you apparently didn't get that I UNDERSTOOD it was a sock and was
using the "sock" reference to segue into other types of underwear.
Hence the mention of underroos.
>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I was thinking more like a pair of well-used, unwashed, pee-stained
>>>>>> underroos. ; )
>>>>>>
>>>>> Again, SPIT OUT THE FUCKING HOOK YOU SAD PATHETIC WOMAN!
>>>> LOL, what "hook???" You are really amusing . . . I must find more
>>>> fucktards like you!! : )
>>>>
>>> You mean fucktards that laugh at you being trolled? Shouldn't be too
>>> hard.
>> Um. Am I supposed to be hurt by that??
>>
>> Will you let me know if I am?
>>
> Hurt or trolled? Probably not.
Well, since my feelings can't be hurt and I've never met anyone capable
of physically hurting me, I guess that's okay.
>
>>>>>
>>>>> And stop fantasizing about my man and underwear.
>>>> You WISH I was fantasizing about "your man" and his underroos. Sadly,
>>>> as an adult, I go for REAL men. : )
>>>>
>>> Are you sure you're not just trying to slurp them on usenet?
>>
>> Are you serious???????? LOL
>> Can I use that in my sig??? : )
>>
> As soon as you stop fantasize about my man and "underroos".
See above. You know, about the whole segue from "socks" to "skivvies."
>
>>>>> He has way to good
>>>>> taste to go for someone like you.
>>>> Not if you're the standard he goes by.
>>>> *shrugs*
>>>>
>>> Awwww... I'm so hurt.
>> Aww . . . sorry. I guess that means you trolled me, too, huh? : )
>>
> Wouldn't surprise me one bit if I did.
*shrugs*
And like everything else we've discussed, it means less than nothing.
--
Max Grrl
" I LOVE to hurt people"--Max Grrl
as whined by B00b&Crawl, A.S.B-L's biggest pussy.
