Re: auk's self appointed mouthpeace admits trollng ahm is like shooting fish in a barrel <was Re: NOMINATIONS: H-K-L Re: NOMINATION: CNOTM Re: Nice planet.>
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.planets.venus only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: auk's self appointed mouthpeace admits trollng ahm is like shooting fish in a barrel <was Re: NOMINATIONS: H-K-L Re: NOMINATION: CNOTM Re: Nice planet.>         

Group: alt.planets.venus · Group Profile
Author: CovvTseTung
Date: Jan 29, 2007 09:37

In article <6pqpr2diqdd01aqtdfiro81a8agt9cvd85@4ax.com>, metro-
golden-meower says...
> On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 10:17:39 -0800, CovvTseTung
> hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>In article 4ax.com>, metro-
>>golden-meower says...
>>
>>> On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:50:21 -0800, Phoebee Caulfield
>>> notbex.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>>In article 4ax.com>, metro-
>>>>golden-meower says...
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:31:07 -0800, Phoebee Caulfield
>>>>> notbex.edu> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>In article <9pccr21amqqtkm4kavfo5tm7k18jl4rlci@4ax.com>, metro-
>>>>>>golden-meower says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 11:00:41 -0800, Phoebee Caulfield
>>>>>>> notbex.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>In article <46c0r2l62ojv3kl9p8s73jr2l9qmdl9sfs@4ax.com>, metro-
>>>>>>>>golden-meower says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:39:38 -0800, Phoebee Caulfield
>>>>>>>>> notbex.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>In article <31kvq25c2qcd13pug2rfgr14t776jpu9ve@4ax.com>, metro-
>>>>>>>>>>golden-meower says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:35:04 -0800, Phoebee Caulfield
>>>>>>>>>>> notbex.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>In article 4ax.com>, metro-
>>>>>>>>>>>>golden-meower says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:45:08 -0800, Phoebee Caulfield
>>>>>>>>>>>>> notbex.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In article 4ax.com>, metro-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>golden-meower says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 23:08:39 -0600, Max Grrl gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In article <7q4jq259spjaoq5b2ucbjdgav463empgsd@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>metro-golden-meower meow.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 21:21:11 -0600, Max Grrl gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In article 4ax.com>, the mekon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:11:56 -0600, Max Grrl gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In article 4ax.com>, the mekon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 27 Dec 2006 22:22:58 GMT, ThePsyko itookmyprozac.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 27 Dec 2006 I stormed the castle called alt.hackers.malicious and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>heard
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the mekon cry out in news:j5r5p2h9lnovmevss88uas9pbmn3inkv4r@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 09:37:44 -0600, Kali wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"Haha made you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>scream/care" etc. is an a.f thing, anyway.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its just an af thing eh. funny how its appeared in auk an awfull lot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> over the years. oh. you'd not know that would you, you're still a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slurpfesting cleless newbie who cannot defend herself from a kook let
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alone a flamer.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If she can't defend herself, why are you calling her names and taking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>such
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>an agressive stance? Does it make you feel big to pick on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>defenseless?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> becauuse i can, plus, it gives you a chance to pay for all that head
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you've recieved, sir galahad.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Isn't what Hitler said before he blitzed London??
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no idea. i don't speek kraut.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>LOL, I used to . . . spent about 5 years in Germany. Can't remember a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>fucking word of German now, though.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Musta been all that double-bock . . . (yeah, I'm misspelling it - too
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>fucking lazy to look it up).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You know, I coulda just been fooled, but all the Germans I ever spoke
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>to hated the fuck outta Hitler.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like being a nazi and admiting it is going to be something anyone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would do unless they're a skinhead and proud.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Okay, let me be more specific, the Germans I knew I'm fairly sure were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>jewish - to them, just saying the name "Hitler" was enough to clear a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>room or start a fight.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or upset a few poles.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Springtime for Hitler and Germany
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Winter for Poland and France...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the producers is a funny film. yet another classic hollywood thinks
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wasn't good enough and had to remake.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>When I saw the remake I didn't realize that Mel Brooks was
>>>>>>>>>>>>behind it as he was the original - if I had, that might have
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> i didn't know mel brooks was involved with the remake. even knowing
>>>>>>>>>>> that, i'll not watch it. a remake just does not appeal to me, well to
>>>>>>>>>>> be honest, none of the remakes realy appeal to me.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>What we have now is a movie based on a Broadway play that was
>>>>>>>>>>based on a movie about people making Broadway plays. Getting
>>>>>>>>>>close to an infinite regress here...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Mel Brooks wrote all three versions - the original movie, the
>>>>>>>>>>stage play, and the new movie. He also directed the original,
>>>>>>>>>>and produced the remake. The original was his directorial debut
>>>>>>>>>>(and made one heck of a hard act to follow) and won him an Oscar
>>>>>>>>>>for best screenplay.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> i'm not supprized the film won him an oscar. it is after all one very
>>>>>>>>> very funny film. its one of those films i don't mind watching more
>>>>>>>>> than once. there are not many of those. have you ever seen passport to
>>>>>>>>> pimlico? that's one of my all time favourates.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I haven't, but a quick look-up shows a plot line that could be
>>>>>>>>really funny, and the Amazon reviews are really good. Adding to
>>>>>>>>my Netflix queue - thanks!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> i hope you enjoy it. most of the ealing commedys are realy good.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It should be here via post in time for Sat. Nite movies at home.
>>>>>>I'll let you know what I think.
>>>>>
>>>>> i hope you enjoy it. i strongly suggest the whisky galore film, that
>>>>> is another realy good ealing commedy.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> another realy good english film to check out is kind hearts and
>>>>>>> coronets. its an absolute classic.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ealing_Studios
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wisky galore is also very very good. i'd thoughly recomend it. i seem
>>>>>>> to recal there also being a sequal. i cannot remember what it is
>>>>>>> called though.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>softened my reaction a bit. But even then, there is no way the
>>>>>>>>>>>>new cast compares well to the original. Nathan Lane and Matthew
>>>>>>>>>>>>Broderick don't belong on the same set as Zero Mostel and Gene
>>>>>>>>>>>>Wilder. That's almost as bad as George Clooney doing Sinatra...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> i couldn't believe it when the lady killers was remade. its an ealing
>>>>>>>>>>> classic which i actualy have a paid for copy as well as having
>>>>>>>>>>> downloaded it. what kind of idiot would think you could improve on a
>>>>>>>>>>> film like that, which had a cast whos calbre would be impossible to
>>>>>>>>>>> match these days with the shite actors we have nowadays?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>I've never been a Tom Hanks fan, and the idea that he could
>>>>>>>>>>replace Sir Alec Guinness is indeed ludicrous. Not to mention
>>>>>>>>>>Peter Sellers, Jack Warden & crew.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> i don't like him either. if i find out he's in a film it puts me right
>>>>>>>>> off. i feel the same about that little midget, what's his name, tom
>>>>>>>>> cruise. i think i'm kind of lucky growing up seeing actors like those
>>>>>>>>> guys, peter sellers, alec guinness etc, in films on tv on a saturday
>>>>>>>>> or sunday afternoon when i was a kid back in the 70's and early 80's.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Youngster!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> i was born in 68. i'm not exactly that young any more.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You haven't even reached middle-age yet. I took my first
>>>>>>programming course in '67...
>>>>>
>>>>> i guess to find out how old you are i'd have to carbon date you?
>>>>
>>>>I'd prefer something a little less ... destructive
>>>
>>> lop the top of your head off and count the rings?
>>
>>You're nothing if not helpful. *g*
>
> talking about helpfull. how did you enjoy that film?

We watched it Sat. nite. I thought it was pretty good, but I
found myself having to explain some of it (like the ration
coupons) to my old lady. It did remind me of how much I enjoy
British humor. So I've added 'Yes, Minister' to my netflix
queue - it'll be interesting to see if I've missed any episodes
over the years of it showing up on PBS at various times and
places.

--

"Tis an ill wind that blows no minds"
...PK
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!