Re: Copyright of Wedding Album
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.photography only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Copyright of Wedding Album         

Group: alt.photography · Group Profile
Author: Mr. Strat
Date: Jun 26, 2008 13:46

In article
<820d17f2-19ee-4e05-ac15-4741bc48b595@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>,
annamalai gmail.com> wrote:
> The focus is only on the wedding album. I believe that the copyright
> of the wedding album must mandatorily go to the bride and groom and
> not the photographer who is hired to provide the service of taking
> photographs. I have listed down the reasons in my blog at
>
> http://missingrainbow.blogspot.com/2008/06/copyright-of-wedding-album.html
>
> Can you guys comment on it? If anybody feels the way I feel, can you
> provide any further valid reasons to support it. (If this is not the
> right forum, please direct me to the correct forum.)

OK, you're retarded.

One of the primary reasons professional photographers seek to make
future copies of their work is so that they can control the quality.

It's probably rare these days for a photofinisher to have the ability
to print medium format negatives, but regardless of if it's film or
digital, if you have crappy prints made by Wal-Mart, it reflects
negatively when people see them and ask who took them.

Plus, it's my living (or was). I created the images, so I own the
rights to them. Get an education, moron.
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!