You see all the time: the Big Fish SUV with the Jesus fish
intimidating and sometimes eating the Small Fish on the bicycle. I say
that if Jesus were to come back on his ass, he wouldn't last long
among the Christians lions. They'd probably kick his ass, and send him
back where he came from...

This comment indeed makes you reflect about that reality. It's ironic
though that those who claim to believe in Jesus practice SOCIAL
DARWINISM, while those of us who believe in BIOLOGICAL DARWINISM
reject the immorality in "fish eat fish" as a negation of CIVILIZED
BEHAVIOR. And yet their behavior confirms that the alpha-male monkeys
among us are on the loose. Without further ado, here's the comment...

'Indeed opportunities for a little "agit-prop" and class struggle
abound everywhere if we only seize the moment.

I would not belong to a religion like Christianity that was such a
facile tool for demagogues. Altho, I can see how hypocrites need a
religion that will forgive them.

Good points about how Christians act darwinian while darwinians act
benevolently. Darwinian women have used birth control, and now a
generation later, Christian women have outbred them, putting more
Christian voters in a position to select demagogic leadership, with the
net result that the world is worse off for it.

Liberals need to either abandon "one man, one vote", or figure out how
to ramp up their breeding before the fundies have so much power they
start a new round of inquisitions.

On Mon, 05 May 2008 12:50:48 -0500, Day Brown hughes.net>
wrote:

"christians breeding christians" is not a decent description of what
happens. Christianity is an infectious disease spread to the children
after birth.

On Mon, 05 May 2008 12:50:48 -0500, Day Brown hughes.net>
wrote:

Ramp up breeding sounds like a very bad idea, but there are other
alternatives (like war famine and disease - the Christian trifecta of
population control).
--

I would not belong to a religion like Christianity that was such a
facile tool for demagogues. Altho, I can see how hypocrites need a
religion that will forgive them.

Good points about how Christians act darwinian while darwinians act
benevolently. Darwinian women have used birth control, and now a
generation later, Christian women have outbred them, putting more
Christian voters in a position to select demagogic leadership, with the
net result that the world is worse off for it.

Liberals need to either abandon "one man, one vote", or figure out how
to ramp up their breeding before the fundies have so much power they
start a new round of inquisitions.

On Sun, 04 May 2008 14:56:21 -0500, Day Brown hughes.net>
wrote:

Wrong. Christianity isn't transmitted through birth, but through
infection at a later date. What's needed is disease control, not
increased breeding.

On May 5, 4:06 pm, real1 wrote: