> On Mar 7, 6:22 am, Andy
googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>> Is there a single evil human being? My life experience has told me
>> that that is probably not the case.
>
> Wow humanism in all of its ugly glory. "Is there anyone evil? No,
> because I have decided there is no evil."
> This is such an excuse. These actions are not really wrong because
> of ...
> The logical conclusion is that we really shouldn't punish them
> and that we should be accepting of any
> behavior (e.g. you want to rape and kill your neighbor .... go ahead
> who am I to define your morality).
> This is both ridiculous and dangerous.
You are absolutely correct, and why such references were removed from
Christian treachings by Constantine.
For those who know first hand, such reality, they have developed a state of
absolute respect for an individuals right to find out for themselves, which
is what the whole process is all about.
This , as opposed to "believers", who will cause extreme havoc, for some
future heaventy reward.
BOfL
>
> The moral divide between humans is
>> a matter of maturity. If our current life on earth is just one of many
>> incarnations of the soul, whether in this world or in any other, it
>> would follow that while all souls are equal, some are older than
>> others.
>>
>> Consider a thief. How can he be cured of his criminality? Well, if he
>> reaches the conclusion that everything that he steals will be stolen
>> from him- in this life or the next- he will realise the futility of
>> crime and stop. Quite simply, when you realise that "what goes around
>> comes around", only then will one's behaviour start to improve.
>>
>> I think it was Jesus who said "Be sure your sins will find you out"
>>
>> So our thief is not actually a wicked man, but someone who is
>> relatively new to the game of life and hasn't learned the rules. He is
>> a "young soul". It is very similar to the child who pulls a puppy's
>> tail. Only when he gets bitten, does he stop.
>>
>> Cheats may prosper during a single life, but when you bring multiple
>> incarnations into the equation, nobody gets away with anything. Death
>> means nothing- the spiritual "baggage" is carried over from one life
>> to the next.
>>
>> The young soul seeks worldly pleasures. These include wealth, fame,
>> sexual prowess and power. There is a problem with this. All are double
>> edged swords...
>>
>> If you are rich, it is very difficult to tell who your friends are.
>> The poor man knows that everybody who loves him loves him for who he
>> is, not what he can potentially offer them. For the rich man, he is
>> always under the suspicion that someone is after his cash. He becomes
>> jealous, and unhappy.
>>
>> The celebrity may own a mansion house, but it is often his jail. The
>> "nobody" can take a walk to the supermarket, in the park, on the beach
>> completely anonymously. And there's worse. Consider being a pop star
>> with several million fans. If one in ten people are mentally ill, and
>> one in a hundred are so mentally ill that they are a potential threat
>> to themselves and others, and one in a thousand are a so seriously
>> psychotic that they need hospitalisation, there's a chance that
>> someone will be out to kill you. How many Mark Chapmans are out there?
>> To quote Roger Waters, fame is "exchanging a walk on part in the war
>> for a lead role in a cage"
>>
>> If you are sexy, then you have the problem that there is always
>> someone trying to chat you up. This is going to put a great strain on
>> any monogamous relationship. Also, as with the rich, it is difficult
>> to tell if you are a soulmate of your partner or a trophy. Whereas
>> those with very average looks (or below average) know that their
>> parner loves the person inside, not the body.
>>
>> If you are powerful, it is difficult to have any true friendships. How
>> do you know that someone is not after a favour, or after your job? How
>> can you tell what is a bung, bribe, a Macbeth, or genuine help and
>> advice. This brings with it a high degree of paranoia. Gandhi could
>> have been president of India, elected by a huge majority. He refused
>> to stand, because he didn't want to be corrupted by the power. He
>> wanted to lead his people, yes, but rule them, no.
>>
>> The "old soul" has realised this, and seeks something greater. To
>> love, to create, to help, to share. Unlike the "young soul", the older
>> does not see the world as one with scarce resources to be fought over,
>> but one of limitless abundance. The older soul believes that five
>> small fishes can indeed feed five thousand people. The older soul does
>> not believe in war (we've got paintball!) or killing, as the dead will
>> simply return and carry on where they left off.
>>
>> Am I a young soul or an old soul? I am neither- I'm a teenage one. I'm
>> in the process of changing. I want to change, but need to dig deeper
>> to find the courage to do so. It is not an easy task when faced with
>> the bombardment of "young soul" media. I sometimes feel that I am
>> playing a game of cards with the Devil, trying to win back my soul. I
>> can relate to Jesus' forty days in the wilderness and Buddha's
>> enlightenment under the banyan tree. Some souls mature quicker than
>> others. What took Buddha and Christ a relatively short time is taking
>> me a lot longer. To me that draws a a parallel to physical puberty- it
>> comes to some people earlier than others.
>>
>> I am at the stage where I realise that I was in the wrong. I realise
>> that I am still doing wrong. The next step is to make a start in
>> correcting my own mistakes, and by sharing my experiences, maybe help
>> others correct theirs. It's amazing how a group of addicts can help
>> each other achieve sobriety. Introducing yourself at an AA meeting
>> takes the form of "I'm X, and I'm an alcoholic". The first step is to
>> surrender to your addiction and admit the truth.
>>
>> I'm at the point where I'm saying "I'm Andy, and I'm a materialist". I
>> am hooked on not only drugs but the pleasures of the flesh- money,
>> power, fame, sex.
>>
>> It is very interesting to compare the Biblical view of creation with
>> the scientific one. The big bang and the original sin- different
>> metaphors for the same thing? Both symbolise a movement "away" from
>> "God". The original sin was the "big bang" of Karma- the pushing of
>> the spiritual pendulum, which will swing us emotionally from left to
>> right, high to low, till eventually we settle somewhere in the middle,
>> once again in perfect peace.
>>
>> Earth is a strange place, as it is largely ruled by the "young" as
>> opposed to the "mature". I sometimes wonder, with this in mind, if
>> this planet is a "university" for a higher form of being. If that is
>> the case, then the meaning of life is to graduate.
>