| Re: Would you call FunkenStein an idiot ? do you know who he is ? |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) Date: Sep 15, 2008 06:09
> On Sep 13, 5:52 am, dlzc cox.net> wrote:>> On Sep 12, 6:46 pm, Jeff$B"%%(BRelf
>> wrote:
...
>>> but would you callFunkenSteinan idiot ?
>>> do you know who he is ?
>>
>> I could care less. "funkenstein", like you,
>> made no reply with any sort of discussion
>> indicated, no citations, just a one-liner
>> purposefully intended to be obtuse. If
>> they are not interested in discussion,
>> enough to bother with a substantive reply,
>> what business is it of yours? Are you
>> "his" puppy, "his" cheering squad? Don't
>> answer that.
...
> My apologies, I was rather obtuse and
> didn't really follow the thread.
No apologies required. Everyone occasionally "cuts loose" in a
public place.
> My point was just that we know very little
> about the state of matter/ energy that
> exists in massive collapsed stars inside
> the schwarzschild radius, or inside the
> schwarzschild radius of the massive
> object in Sgr.A.
>
> On that subject, I must confess idiocy.
Do you think we can know more?
Do you think "dual to black holes" showed us nothing new?
Do you think Columbus had any idea he was not going to reach
India when he planned the trip?
Now is also "undiscovered country".
David A. Smith
| 
