On Sep 13, 5:52 am, dlzc
cox.net> wrote:> Dear Jeffâ–²Relf:
>
> On Sep 12, 6:46 pm, Jeffâ–²Relf wrote:
>
>
> ... which you obviously did not read ...
>
>> and said: " Observation seems to agree
>> with theory ' really closely '. "
>> andFunkenSteinreplied:
>> " True. Neither one goes anywhere near
>> the event horizon. " .
>
>> Now, I know you will always call me an
>> " idiot ",
>
> Review the history. I believe I have never called you an idiot, but
> if you feel you are, why do you continue to post?
>
>> just like you call most people idiots;
>
> That is a bald-faced lie. I have called people liars. But not "most
> people", or even "most people that disagree with me".
>
>> but would you callFunkenSteinan idiot ?
>> do you know who he is ?
>
> I could care less. "funkenstein", like you, made no reply with any
> sort of discussion indicated, no citations, just a one-liner
> purposefully intended to be obtuse. If they are not interested in
> discussion, enough to bother with a substantive reply, what business
> is it of yours? Are you "his" puppy, "his" cheering squad? Don't
> answer that.
>
> Do you, Jeff, have something substantive to say on this topic, or are
> you just going to snipe? I can take you out of my killfile if you
> want to talk physics...
>
> David A. Smith
My apologies, I was rather obtuse and didn't really follow the
thread.
My point was just that we know very little about the state of matter/
energy that exists in massive collapsed stars inside the schwarzschild
radius, or inside the schwarzschild radius of the massive object in
Sgr.A.
On that subject, I must confess idiocy.
