| Re: Would you call FunkenStein an idiot ? do you know who he is ? |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: dlzcdlzc Date: Sep 12, 2008 20:52
Dear Jeffâ–²Relf:
On Sep 12, 6:46 pm, Jeffâ–²Relf wrote:
... which you obviously did not read ...
> and said: " Observation seems to agree
> with theory ' really closely '. "
> and FunkenStein replied:
> " True. Neither one goes anywhere near
> the event horizon. " .
>
> Now, I know you will always call me an
> " idiot ",
Review the history. I believe I have never called you an idiot, but
if you feel you are, why do you continue to post?
> just like you call most people idiots;
That is a bald-faced lie. I have called people liars. But not "most
people", or even "most people that disagree with me".
> but would you call FunkenStein an idiot ?
> do you know who he is ?
I could care less. "funkenstein", like you, made no reply with any
sort of discussion indicated, no citations, just a one-liner
purposefully intended to be obtuse. If they are not interested in
discussion, enough to bother with a substantive reply, what business
is it of yours? Are you "his" puppy, "his" cheering squad? Don't
answer that.
Do you, Jeff, have something substantive to say on this topic, or are
you just going to snipe? I can take you out of my killfile if you
want to talk physics...
David A. Smith
| 
