|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: saint7petersaint7peter Date: May 17, 2008 08:29
On May 17, 7:46 am, Emma newsguy.com> wrote:> In article nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com>, cactus says...
>>>Emma wrote:
>>>> Emma wrote:
>>>>>>> That is dreadfully offensive. You alternate between being
>>>>>>> very nice and tolerant, and very unkind and intolerant.
>>>>>>> Christianity doesn't make me mentally impaired.
>>>>>> Just because I think that secular societies can accomplish more than
>>>>>> faith based ones?
>>>>> No, because you compare Christianity to mental illness.
>>>> NO I DIDN'T. NO I DIDN'T. NO I DIDN'T.
>
>>> Yes, you did.
>
>>> Your example for comparison was a mental illness.
>>> It's there in the thread. It's impossible to deny.
>
>>You don't seem to get it. My point was that Europe would be much farther ...
|
| Show full article (14.29Kb) |
|
| | 171 Comments |
|
|
Author: ImmortalistImmortalist Date: May 17, 2008 10:54
> On May 17, 7:46 am, Emma newsguy.com> wrote:
>>> Well since the Enlightenment we have had wars and
>> revolutions, two world wars and the Cold War.
>
>> No doubt you will somehow still blame all of that on
>> religion though.
>
|
| Show full article (21.62Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: saint7petersaint7peter Date: May 17, 2008 12:12
On May 17, 10:54 am, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:>> On May 17, 7:46 am, Emma newsguy.com> wrote:>
>>> Well since the Enlightenment we have had wars and
>>> revolutions, two world wars and the Cold War.
>
>>> No doubt you will somehow still blame all of that on
>>> religion though.
>
>>>>to say the religion is wrong? I think the act is wrong and immoral. But
>>>>such religions will eventually die out in this modern world as their
>>>>practitioners end up in jail.
>
>>> That is a bizarre answer. You're not able to say
>>> that a murderous religion is wrong??
>
>>>>>> There
>>>>>> are many paths to the Godhead, of which ours are but two. ...
|
| Show full article (1.30Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
Author: OnoitOnoit Date: May 17, 2008 13:43
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: saint7petersaint7peter Date: May 17, 2008 16:17
On May 17, 1:43 pm, "Onoit" wrote:
> To himself?
Away from a God whose only virtue is that He doesn't exist. Such is
the JHVH EL of the Old Testament.
|
| |
| 44 Comments |
|
|
Author: Darrell StecDarrell Stec Date: May 17, 2008 16:38
> On May 17, 1:43 pm, "Onoit" wrote:
>> To himself?
>
> Away from a God whose only virtue is that He doesn't exist. Such is
> the JHVH EL of the Old Testament.
What is the JHVH EL? Are you mistakingly trying to prevent writing the
Tetragrammon, YHVH? If so, the injunction was against utter those sacred
constanants not writting them, and besides it ONLY applied to Hebrew, not
English, not Aramaic, nor Greek. And it definitely did not apply to the
name Jehovah with is a complete bastardization.
--
Later,
Darrell Stec darstec@ neo.rr.com
Webpage Sorcery
http://webpagesorcery.com
We Put the Magic in Your Webpages
|
| |
| 9 Comments |
|
|
Author: saint7petersaint7peter Date: May 17, 2008 17:10
On May 17, 4:38 pm, Darrell Stec webpagesorcery.com>
wrote:>> On May 17, 1:43 pm, "Onoit" wrote:
>>> To himself?
>
>> Away from a God whose only virtue is that He doesn't exist. Such is
>> the JHVH EL of the Old Testament.
>
> What is the JHVH EL? Are you mistakingly trying to prevent writing the
> Tetragrammon, YHVH? If so, the injunction was against utter those sacred
> constanants not writting them, and besides it ONLY applied to Hebrew, not
> English, not Aramaic, nor Greek. And it definitely did not apply to the
> name Jehovah with is a complete bastardization.
>
> --
> Later,
> Darrell Stec dars...@ neo.rr.com
>
> Webpage Sorceryhttp://webpagesorcery.com ...
|
| Show full article (1.15Kb) |
| 8 Comments |
|
|
Author: saint7petersaint7peter Date: May 17, 2008 17:15
> On May 17, 4:38 pm, Darrell Stec webpagesorcery.com>
> wrote:
>>>> On May 17, 1:43 pm, "Onoit" wrote:
>>>> To himself?
>
>>> Away from a God whose only virtue is that He doesn't exist. Such is
>>> the JHVH EL of the Old Testament.
>
>> What is the JHVH EL? Are you mistakingly trying to prevent writing the
>> Tetragrammon, YHVH? If so, the injunction was against utter those sacred
>> constanants not writting them, and besides it ONLY applied to Hebrew, not
>> English, not Aramaic, nor Greek. And it definitely did not apply to the
>> name Jehovah with is a complete bastardization.
>
>> --
>> Later,
>> Darrell Stec dars...@ neo.rr.com ...
|
| Show full article (1.35Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Darrell StecDarrell Stec Date: May 17, 2008 18:43
> On May 17, 4:38 pm, Darrell Stec webpagesorcery.com>
> wrote:>>> On May 17, 1:43 pm, "Onoit" wrote:
>>>> To himself?
>>
>>> Away from...
|
| Show full article (1.92Kb) |
| 6 Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: saint7petersaint7peter Date: May 17, 2008 20:15
On May 17, 6:43 pm, Darrell Stec webpagesorcery.com>
wrote:>> On May 17, 4:38 pm, Darrell Stec webpagesorcery.com>
>> wrote:>>>> On May 17, 1:43 pm, "Onoit" wrote:
>>>>> To himself?
>
>>>> Away from a God whose only virtue is that He doesn't exist. Such is
>>>> the JHVH EL of the Old Testament.
>
>>> What is the JHVH EL? Are you mistakingly trying to prevent writing the
>>> Tetragrammon, YHVH? If so, the injunction was against utter those sacred
>>> constanants not writting them, and besides it ONLY applied to Hebrew, not
>>> English, not Aramaic, nor Greek. And it definitely did not apply to the
>>> name Jehovah with is a complete bastardization.
>
>>> --
>>> Later, ...
|
| Show full article (3.22Kb) |
| 4 Comments |
|
|
|
|
