|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Sir FrederickSir Frederick Date: Aug 15, 2008 14:27
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaff
If you quaff too much or too little, you will become problematic.
All philosophers must quaff, enough.
Without quaffing there is no philosophy.
Funda-mental, or is that funda-soma?
--
Frederick Martin McNeill
Poway, California, United States of America
mmcneill@ fuzzysys.com
******************************************
"I never cease being dumbfounded by the unbelievable things people believe."
- Leo Rosten
******************************************
|
| |
|
| | 5 Comments |
|
|
Author: toolytooly Date: Aug 15, 2008 17:22
"Sir Frederick" fuzzysys.com> wrote in message
news:aksba4tr36qoqojuijshhd9ecu3ckk53nr@4ax.com...> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaff
> If you quaff too much or too little, you will become problematic.
> All philosophers must quaff, enough.
> Without quaffing there is no philosophy.
> Funda-mental, or is that funda-soma?
>
>
> --
Philosophical mystery:
How come we can quaff our own farts but cannot quaff the boquet of
another's?
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Sir FrederickSir Frederick Date: Aug 15, 2008 17:36
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 20:22:54 -0400, "tooly" bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>"Sir Frederick" fuzzysys.com> wrote in message
>news:aksba4tr36qoqojuijshhd9ecu3ckk53nr@4ax.com...>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaff
>> If you quaff too much or too little, you will become problematic.
>> All philosophers must quaff, enough.
>> Without quaffing there is no philosophy.
>> Funda-mental, or is that funda-soma?
>>
>>
>> -- >
>Philosophical mystery:
>How come we can quaff our own farts but cannot quaff the boquet of
>another's?
>
Speak for yourself, besides, you are misusing the word.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: John JonesJohn Jones Date: Aug 15, 2008 18:37
Sir Frederick wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 20:22:54 -0400, "tooly" bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >> "Sir Frederick" fuzzysys.com> wrote in message
>> news:aksba4tr36qoqojuijshhd9ecu3ckk53nr@4ax.com...>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaff
>>> If you quaff too much or too little, you will become problematic.
>>> All philosophers must quaff, enough.
>>> Without quaffing there is no philosophy.
>>> Funda-mental, or is that funda-soma?
>>>
>>>
>>> -- >> Philosophical mystery:
>> How come we can quaff our own farts but cannot quaff the boquet of
>> another's?
>>
> Speak for yourself, besides, you are misusing the word.
|
| Show full article (0.76Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ImmortalistImmortalist Date: Aug 15, 2008 21:36
On Aug 15, 2:27 pm, Sir Frederick fuzzysys.com> wrote:> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaff
> If you quaff too much or too little, you will become problematic.
> All philosophers must quaff, enough.
> Without quaffing there is no philosophy.
> Funda-mental, or is that funda-soma?
>
> --
> Frederick Martin McNeill
> Poway, California, United States of America
> mmcne...@ fuzzysys.com
> ******************************************
> "I never cease being dumbfounded by the unbelievable things people believe."
> - Leo Rosten
> ******************************************
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: toolytooly Date: Aug 16, 2008 11:15
"Sir Frederick" fuzzysys.com> wrote in message
news:s28ca4luk11giv64v0hn79tv7oh1nsann8@4ax.com...> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 20:22:54 -0400, "tooly" bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>>
>>"Sir Frederick" fuzzysys.com> wrote in message
>>news:aksba4tr36qoqojuijshhd9ecu3ckk53nr@4ax.com...>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaff
>>> If you quaff too much or too little, you will become problematic.
>>> All philosophers must quaff, enough.
>>> Without quaffing there is no philosophy.
>>> Funda-mental, or is that funda-soma?
>>>
>>>
>>> -- >>
>>Philosophical mystery:
>>How come we can quaff our own farts but cannot quaff the boquet of
>>another's?
>> ...
|
| Show full article (0.79Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
