> Ford, apparently the parent company of mazda, is apparently nearly
> bankrupt in massive debt
>
> By-dang there could be an efficacious "water car" yet
>
> i know, it's probably more sky in the pie, buba-mises (b.s., grandma's
> tales)
>
> Bill Ford, grandson of Henry, help the world obtain a crying necessity
> as oil hovers at eighty-one dollars canadian per barrel, as the crazy
> war drains the u.s. treasury

> On Oct 3, 10:41 am, Robert Cohen msn.com> wrote:
>

>> Ford, apparently the parent company of mazda, is apparently nearly
>> bankrupt in massive debt

>

>> By-dang there could be an efficacious "water car" yet

>

>> i know, it's probably more sky in the pie, buba-mises (b.s., grandma's
>> tales)

>

> On Oct 3, 10:42 am, Robert Cohen msn.com> wrote:
>

>> On Oct 3, 10:41 am, Robert Cohen msn.com> wrote:

>

>>> Ford, apparently the parent company of mazda, is apparently nearly
>>> bankrupt in massive debt

>

>>> By-dang there could be an efficacious "water car" yet

>

>>> i know, it's probably more sky in the pie, buba-mises (b.s., grandma's
>>> tales)

>
> You do post this stuff just to annoy me, right? If you read the stupid
> article, instead of just posting it, you would see that it says the
> engine can run on petrol if there's no hydrogen available. So this is
> just an IC engine modified to run on hydrogen, which is not new at
> all, and doesn't change anything.
>
> -tg ...

> H2 can only work if we triple grid capacity.
>
> I recently suggested on sci.energy something that should have been
> studied in depth decades ago:
>
> Electrifying farms with trolly tractors to cut petroleum
> consumption. It's trillions of dollars in fuel savings with an
> increase of only 6%% in grid capacity.
>
> While I did get some praise for the big simple idea -- apparently I'm
> the first --, I got even more flames. People were whining about
> keeping the grid up . . . .
>
> Bret Cahill

> On Oct 4, 9:38 am, Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote:
>

>> H2 can only work if we triple grid capacity.

>

>> I recently suggested on sci.energy something that should have been
>> studied in depth decades ago:

>

>> Electrifying farms with trolly tractors to cut petroleum
>> consumption. It's trillions of dollars in fuel savings with an
>> increase of only 6%% in grid capacity.

>

>> While I did get some praise for the big simple idea -- apparently I'm
>> the first --, I got even more flames. People were whining about
>> keeping the grid up . . . .

>

>> Bret Cahill

>
> WTF is a trolley tractor? Does it run on rails?
> ...