Re: Why We Don't Celebrate A "Capital Day"
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Why We Don't Celebrate A "Capital Day"         

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: Bret Cahill
Date: Sep 2, 2008 08:50

>>>> "Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the
>>>> fruit of labor, and could never have existed if Labor had not first
>>>> existed. Labor is superior to capital, and deserves much the higher
>>>> consideration."
>>>> -- Lincoln
>>> Lincoln lived in a time when labor was much more of a fraction of
>>> production than it is now.
>> "Labor" includes more than just stacking boxes. �It includes all kinds
>> of desk bound paper pusher services, accounting, law, music, writing,
>> high tech . . . .
> That is true *now*. It was much less true *then*.

Introducing new types of labor hardly changes the truth of the Lincoln
quote.
> When they said
> "work" in 1830, they meant mainly in foot-pounds.

Even before then everyone was aware of steam replacing human
_physical_ labor.
>>> And his derivation is 100%% correct -
>>> capital without labor is utterly meaningless.
>>> To the tread title: a child asks "Mommy, why is there a Mother's
>>> Day and a Father's Day but there is no Children's Day?"
>>> "Because every day is children's day."
>> My mom tried that one on me back when I was a kid but later I found
>> out that in Mexico, an enlightened country, they do in fact, have a
>> children's day.
> Ah well.

Check out my new sig.

Bret Cahill

"Fun is the father of invention."

-- Bret Cahill
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!