>
>
> germans are an intelligent people but no match for the jews. german
> science was oriented towards teutonic technology, machinery, and
> engineering than theoretical brilliance that could really lead to some
> truly big shit. this is why nazi germany made a lot of excellent
> planes, tanks, guns, cannons, and rockets but miserably failed in the
> race to make the atomic bomb. the jews were the experts of the bomb
> on every level. when german scientists were captured and secretly
> observed after WWII, it became clear that the best 'aryan' minds
> hadn't a clue about nuclear science. they were not even close. they
> were cavemen compared to the jews. it was like hulk hogan trying to
> be witty as woody allen. it was like polacks trying to screw on a
> lightbulb.
>
> indeed, this is why german scientists employed by US and USSR after
> the war focused on stuff like rocket technology than advanced
> theoretical stuff. consider werner von braun. when it came to fine
> theoretical details, jews were the king. and they still are, which is
> why the computer industry is dominated by jews. all the superduper
> billionaires in america will be jews working in hightech, and they're
> gonna use their tremendous amount of money earned thru hypercapitalism
> to, ironically, fund socialism. jews are funny this way. part of them
> wanna make all the money, and another part of them want to control
> society like a giant laboratory according to their social theories.
> money-loving jews go into capitalism, and idea-loving jews write the
> books. money-loving jews read the books of idea-loving jews and also
> fund the idea-loving jews(who are leftist). so, we have jewish
> hypercapitalism supporting jewish socialism. jews rise above us and
> then preach to us about equality. if george soros and sergei brin
> wanna be equal, they should work at walmart and get an ass tattoo like
> the rest of the working class. instead, they make billions, fund
> socialists, and preach to us about 'social justice'.
>
> anyway, it's funny that the character of Dr. Strangelove should be a
> nazi scientist and the leading brains behind the doomsday nuclear war
> machine. shouldn't he be a jew since jews were the ones who invented
> and built the nuclear bomb? but, i guess the jews who made the film
> didn't wanna give us a monstrous jew as the harbinger of doom for all
> mankind. (ironically, it's rocket science perfected by ex-nazi
> scientists which got the free world to the moon and made us reflect on
> the fragility of mankind on a small blue planet.) also, it was so
> fashionable to portray an ex-nazi as the personification of perversity
> and evil.
>
> yet, it's not so simple. in some ways, dr. strangelove is--and was
> slyly meant to be--the most admirable character in the movie. he's
> least hypocritical and most cold eyed truthful about world politics
> and human nature. in Full Metal Jacket, an commander says 'inside
> every gook is an american trying to get out'. in Dr. Strangelove,
> it's like 'inside every american, there is a nazi trying to get out'.
> but, given the nature of strangelove's brilliance, one could also say,
> rather perversely, that 'inside every nazi is a jew trying to get
> out'--or maybe, 'inside every jew, there is a nazi trying to get
> out'. this is partly true because jewish kubrick used dr. strangelove
> as his mouthpiece. if kubrick philosophically identified with any
> character in the movie, it was dr. strangelove. this isn't to say
> kubrick was a sociopathic psycho but to say he has a very
> unsentimental and cold-eyed view of mankind. when he was making
> Eyes Wide Shut, kubrick told frederic raphael that 'hitler was right
> about everything'. he obviously didn't meant that hitler's hatred was
> justified or that 6 million jews deserved to die. but, he agreed with
> the nazi position that the only REAL revolution can come thru genetic
> evolution/revolution, not thru social policy, politics, economics,
> etc. mankind is essentially biology. spirituality is a stuff of
> human imagination, not human genetic makeup. if spirituality is the
> answer, it must grow within us genetically and not merely thru our
> power to fantasize. this is why david bowman in 2001 is GENETICALLY
> spiritualized by the mysterious alien folks.
> as long as man fundamentally remains an hairless ape with animalistic
> instincts, our social policies and laws can only do so much. thru
> social ideas and policies, we can never be higher or better human
> beings but only better-controlled human animals. but, greater
> advances in technology also means greater ability for mankind to
> destroy itself--with nuclear weapons and such. also, the danger of
> science and rationalism is this silly idea that intelligent people can
> devise social policies that can make us into better people. we saw the
> hollowness of that idea in A Clockwork Orange. alex is programmed
> from a dangerous human animal to a defenseless human animal than into
> a better human being. this is all the more confused when most of
> human creativity is fueled by animal instincts. sucking out all the
> animalistic hormones from humans will make them less dangerous but
> also into useless veggies without any will to do anything.
>
> also, what passes for liberal goodness is really founded on naivete
> that is stupidly or willfully blind to the ruthlessness of the natural/
> human order. for example, the reason why humans are safe from nature
> is because we ruthlessly wiped out nature around human communities.
> this sense of security has convinced many people to see wild animals
> as simply wonderful, safe, and noble; so, when people actually
> confront mean animals in nature, they are shocked. or, consider racial
> problems in the US. during the civil rights movement, whites fooled
> themselves into thinking whites and blacks could get along just
> famously; after all, most blacks seem to be law-abiding and respectful
> to honkeys. what most liberals failed to understand was that blacks
> were ostensibly respectful and relatively self-restrained due to their
> fear of white power and violence. once whites all turned liberalish
> and pussified, the physically stronger blacks began to kick honkey ass
> and rip up the racial contract of the civil rights movement.
> and, for a long time, the western world looked upon the chinese with
> compassion and sympathy as hopelessly poor and inept yellow sick man
> of asia. but look at the rise of china today and their nasty national
> and chauvanistic international policy. liberalism is willfully blind,
> naive, and faggoty bullshi*. worse, it's been a luxury made
> affordable by western domination of the world. even as white liberals
> will never admit this, western liberalism would not have been possible
> WITHOUT western domination. it was a sense of security gained thru
> the western gun that allowed white man to delude himself that the west
> is respected for its liberty and goodness than for its power, wealth,
> and might. this isn't to say that might-is-right but merely to say
> that right-must-be-backed-with-might. overly self-critical white
> liberalism will not make non-whites respect the white man more but
> only feel more contempt and hatred.
>
> because human genius and creativity is paradoxical combination of
> aggressive animal instincts and calming spiritual wisdom, kubrick's
> ONLY optimistic film is 2001 where david bowman is altered genetically
> reconfigured by higher beings. even though the real secret to human
> progress is in our genes, humans cannot succeed at bio-engineering
> because the structure of the human brains only lead to the building of
> more elaborate cages as we try to break out of preexisting cages. this
> is both psychologically and socially true. all this psychanalysis
> stuff has only caged people in new mental prisons. also, the more we
> try to make our lives easier thru technology, the more enslaved we
> become to technology. electicity is great, but if a power company
> goes down, millions of us are helpless. or, consider the rising cost
> of oil. cars are great but without oil, our entire economy shuts down
> and we become helpless. humans are way too utilitarian in everything
> they do. so, genetic science may simply regard man as just a living
> machine even as we treat machines more as programmed organisms. no
> matter how we perfect man, we cannot go beyond man; yet, the only way
> to save humanity is to go beyond humanity. but, how can man go beyond
> man? so, we need higher beings, as in 2001.
>
> also, we saw the result of man trying to achieve genetic revolution/
> evolution in the case of nazism, and it was horrific. also, it was
> funny that less intelligent germans were killing off more intelligent
> jews in the name of weeding out the inferior race. so, even nazi
> idealism wasn't true to its ideals. if intelligence was one sign of
> racial superiority, then germans should have put jews at the top of
> the social order. but, what really motivated nazism was germanic
> tribalism than any real scientific understanding of human races.
> nothing made this point clearer than the competition between aryan
> scientists and jewish scientists during WWII. the aryans built some
> badass heavy duty rockets but jews figured out a way to level an
> entire city with a few ounces of nuclear material. german science was
> badass but jewish science was awesome. japs found out too--their pagan
> gods were no match to the god of the jews. it was like yul brynner in
> Ten Commandments saying, 'their god IS god' after his army gets wiped
> out in the red sea.
>
> so, kubrick's remark that 'hitler was right about everything' has to
> be taken with a grain of salt. what he meant was no ideology or
> system can really save or change man unless the man is changed at his
> molecular/genetic core. everything else is purely cosmetic. it was
> like undergoing plastic surgery to make an ugly face pretty, while
> disregarding the fact that the dna code of the person is still ugly-
> faced. for the face to be truly pretty, the dna code must be made
> pretty. for man to be truly moral, the dna code must be reprogrammed
> to make man wiser. but, what is the secret? hitler didn't know. he
> was more like gay texas chainsaw massacre dude pretending to be an
> expert surgeon. and, the scientists in A Clockwork Orange didn't know
> either; they only perfected a method of behavioralism which
> manipulated only the external mechanisms thru crude biochemistry. so,
> kubrick could only be hopeful by inventing higher beings from another
> world in 2001 Space Odyssey.
>
> but, there was something of a kinship between kubrick, hitler, and dr.
> strangelove. kubrick, like the crazy nazis, had little trust in human
> nature. he had a very grim, even brutal view of humanity. kubrick was
> no humanist nor a sentimentalist. he was certainly capable of empathy
> but not real sympathy. if spielberg identified mainly with david in
> AI, kubrick surely identified most with the scientist who done created
> david.
> also, he may have agreed with hitler except on the matter of the
> superior race. the superior race was not the aryan but the jew.
> though he could never say admit it publicly, kubrick was kinda like a
> jewish hitler who saw jews at the top of the racial hierarchy. this
> isn't to say that he was murderous and genocidal. but, he clearly did
> see hierarchy as the essence in nature and among humans. kubrick was
> into the nietzsche thing. so, more accurately, kubrick was more like a
> jewish nietzsche than a jewish hitler. he rejected the notion of
> equality of the races or 'all men are created equal'. unlike hitler
> though, he was curious about all peoples and cultures. like hitler, he
> saw biology as far more deterministic of history than ideas; indeed,
> even ideas were shaped by biology. the reason why black africans
> never produced a moses, buddha, jesus, or socrates is largely due to
> black emotional and intellectual makeup. the reason why chinese never
> produced a coltrane is because chiners have a different set of
> collective auditory archetypes stamped in their psyche. there are two
> kinds of ability. ability that grows from with and ability that is
> learned or mimicked. anyone can mimic, learn, and even master jazz,
> but only the black genetic soul could create it from within.
> similarly, while negroes can learn the wisdom of jesus, blacks
> couldn't have come up with that stuff because it's hard for a negro to
> sit still for 40 days and meditate on the meaning of life. all of
> human knowledge and ability is a combination of ingrown ability and
> imported ability. this is why, even as japs imported western ways,
> they still do in a japanese way. and, this isn't merely a cultural
> matter but a genetic matter. japanese culture turned out the way it
> did party due to the natural inclination of japanese genes. take bob
> and james. bob is wild, crazy, and extroverted and comes up with
> great drum music. james is quiet, withdrawn, and meditative and comes
> up with a spiritual idea. bob can learn from james but is much less
> likely to come up with james's ideas. james can learn from bob but is
> much less likely to come up with bob's drum rhythms. indeed, this is
> why pussyboy whites worship black music; it's something that
> faggotyass white boys couldn't have come up with on their own.
>
> both kubrick's view and hitler's view had common roots in the idea of
> the nietzschean superman. notice that in 2001, it is one superior ape
> that first figures out that a bone can be mighty instrument.
> even if kubrick wasn't murderous, psychotic, or genocidal, he was
> contemptuous of most of humanity.(on the set of Eyes Wide Shut, he
> treated tom cruise and nicole kidman as porn pawns on a chessboard.)
> kubrick also shut himself off from the rest of the world. also, while
> he asked help from others, he rarely reciprocated. in all his movies,
> there isn't much regard for mankind. a movie like A Clockwork Orange
> is especially vicious. perhaps, the movie would have been more
> feasible morally had it been directed by a lesser talent. directed by
> kubrick with mind-blowing brilliance and originality, moral matters
> became secondary to the spectacle of alex's charismatic showmanship.
> the movie became a kind of Triumph of the Swill. though evil, alex
> registers as a superdude who smashes conventional rules because such
> are only for boring, dull, insipid, naive, softheaded morons or
> stiffnecks. at one point, alex beats up a useless drunkard. when he
> attacks the good-hearted writer and his wife, we can't help feeling,
> 'what a couple of stupid, do-goody, naive liberals!!' who deserve to
> be punished for their stupid trust of humanity. later, when we meet
> the writer again as a bitter vengeful man, he seems worse and more
> deranged than david. in this universe, goodness can either be naive or
> easily wiped out by grim social reality.
>
> anyway, kubrick wasn't just happy to be jewish nietzschean. a part of
> him felt that jews were the REAL ubermensch, but another part of him
> desired for the aryan. part of it was sexual. he felt that in terms
> of beauty, aryans had a certain advantage over the jew. so, he
> married a german wife. he supplied the brains, she supplied the
> looks. kubrick wasn't just an intellectual genius but always had an
> eye for beauty. he started out as a photographer and loved art all
> his life. he loved cerebral modern art but also classical and
> traditional art whose central themes were beauty. also, kubrick
> admired strength and power. one of his first films was about boxing.
> so, while he knew that jews were intellectual ubermensch, they were
> not ubermensch of beauty and strength.
> this is why Dr. Strangelove is such a strange character. he is the
> anxious product of creative union of jewishism and aryanism. it's a
> jew trying to break out the aryan, and the aryan trying to break out
> of the jew. he has jewish smarts but aryan spirit.
> spirit is important here because kubrick has tremendous appreciation
> for artistic creativity. though the main creatives forces of the
> modern world were jewish, kubrick had to admit that goyim thru the
> centuries had come up with stuff that even super jewish intelligence
> couldn't touch--greek architecture, aspects of roman civilization,
> german classical music, etc. just how did less intelligent goyim
> come up with that shi*? and, how come even the greatest jewish brain
> cannot reach the heights of talents like beethoven and shakespeare?
> this may be the real nature of harold bloom's obsession with
> shakespeare. bloom knows that the greatest brains are jews. yet, the
> greatest writer of all time was shakespeare. just how did a goy do
> that? it's like a negro pondering the phenomenon of larry bird.
> of course, bloom knows that there have been many great goy writers
> thru history--indeed, far more than great jewish writers. but, bloom
> could understand the operative secret of most great goy writers--
> figure out what made them tick. also, bloom could explain the
> relative late start of jewish creativity due to religious dogmatism
> and/or goy discrimination. but, how do you explain the genius of
> shakespeare which is beyond what bloom's superhigh jewish IQ can
> figure out? in a way, bloom may be hinting, rather cryptically, that
> maybe, just maybe, shakespeare was a jew or front for a jew--similar
> to his notion that the genesis may have been written by a woman.
>
> anyway, though kubrick was proud of his jewish powers he wasn't
> necessarily proud of his jewishness. he saw too much of jewish
> society and culture as grubby and crass(money worshipping hollywood
> producers), too pushy and self-righteous(leftwing and radical jews),
> too vulgar and shameless(entertainment jews), and just downright ugly
> and repulsive.
> he loved his jewish powers of intellect but was ambivlaent about
> jewish culture and attitudes. he grew up in NY but settled in a
> mansion in a quiet english town. part of him wanted the dignified
> gentlemanly english life. part of him was always the topsy turvy
> creative NY jew. he never took on english manners and accent like T.
> S. Eliot did.
> but, kubrick didn't just wanna be a jew jew. aesthetically, he
> preferred the aryan ideal. 2001 has solid white males as heroes than
> grubby looking jews. and, in a way, The Shining about was about
> jewish anxiety in the House of Privileged Goyim. even as nicholson is
> king of the overlook hotel during winter, he doesn't really belong
> there. and, no matter how much he tries to devote himself to
> creativity, he can't help feeling that what really matters in life is
> power, wealth, privilege, and etc as represented by the hotel.
> so, kubrick wanted to be more than a jew. he wanted to be an aryan
> jew. he was afflicted with the hannah arendt syndrome of worship of
> german culture. yet, it was this crazy passion for german culture
> that led to the destruction of jewry in WWII. so, it was a difficult
> issue for kubrick to fathom. yet, deep in his heart, he shared some of
> the same passions as german culture worshippers that led to nazism and
> the holocaust. can one love/admire/worship german culture and still be
> a jew? don't all cultures come with certain built-in prejudices and
> biases? after all, it's difficult to worship jewish culture and
> jewish god AND embrace polytheism. was there a strong strain of mono-
> racialism at the core of german artistic genius and beauty? what did
> this mean for the jew who loved german culture?
> perhaps, the only answer was the fusion of jew and german genes--as in
> the case of kubrick and his german wife. would this lead to the best
> of both worlds? or, would it undermine or violate the best of both?
> take sarah jessica parker, a blonde jewess. she's disgusting! an ugly
> jewess is better than an ugly jewess adorned with touches of aryanism.
> but then, there's paul newman, an almost perfectly beautiful creature
> with best of aryan and semitic traits.
> though tom cruise isn't very jewish looking, he partly represented
> jewish anxiety in Eyes Wide Shut. he's a short dark haired
> guy--'jewish'--married to a tall blonde aryan goddess type, which is
> rather like kubrick with his german wife. this may be one of the
> reasons why kubrick avoided the public eye--he knew that he would look
> stupid walking next to his wife.
> but, tom cruise only partly embodies jewish anxiety in Eyes Wide Shut.
> the other part of his duality embodies the anxiety of the earnest goy
> in a world that is ruled by a ultra-aryan/jewish fusion of assholes.
> the mansion of fancy fuc*ery is where the big guns of old wasp power
> and new jew power come together to slobber all over the best looking
> pussies around the world. it's where the brains get the beauties.
> brains gain the most riches and power. riches and power afford the
> best pussies. is this right or wrong? is it as it should be or as it
> just is?
>
> so, what is to be done? can mankind be saved? can any idea or value
> system save us? a better social policy? such can improve our lot but
> cannot make us better. the only hope for improvement is thru
> genetics, and that means reproduction. we don't know which child will
> be born with the new mutations that will be the genetic basis for
> higher man. but, such child may one day be born. so, all we can do is
> cross our fingers, 'FUC*', and hope, as nicole kidman suggests at the
> end of the movie. maybe, just maybe, out of the billions of new kids,
> there will be the Star Child. so, we should learn to stop worrying and
> do some fuc*ing.