> On May 16, 8:21 pm, animalishness live.com> wrote:

>> germans are an intelligent people but no match for the jews. german
>> science was oriented towards teutonic technology, machinery, and
>> engineering than theoretical brilliance that could really lead to some
>> truly big shit. this is why nazi germany made a lot of excellent
>> planes, tanks, guns, cannons, and rockets but miserably failed in the
>> race to make the atomic bomb. the jews were the experts of the bomb
>> on every level. when german scientists were captured and secretly
>> observed after WWII, it became clear that the best 'aryan' minds
>> hadn't a clue about nuclear science. they were not even close. they
>> were cavemen compared to the jews. it was like hulk hogan trying to
>> be witty as woody allen. it was like polacks trying to screw on a
>> lightbulb.
>>
>> indeed, this is why german scientists employed by US and USSR after
>> the war focused on stuff like rocket technology than advanced
>> theoretical stuff. consider werner von braun. when it came to fine
>> theoretical details, jews were the king. and they still are, which is
>> why the computer industry is dominated by jews. all the superduper
>> billionaires in america will be jews working in hightech, and they're
>> gonna use their tremendous amount of money earned thru hypercapitalism
>> to, ironically, fund socialism. jews are funny this way. part of them
>> wanna make all the money, and another part of them want to control
>> society like a giant laboratory according to their social theories.
>> money-loving jews go into capitalism, and idea-loving jews write the
>> books. money-loving jews read the books of idea-loving jews and also
>> fund the idea-loving jews(who are leftist). so, we have jewish
>> hypercapitalism supporting jewish socialism. jews rise above us and
>> then preach to us about equality. if george soros and sergei brin
>> wanna be equal, they should work at walmart and get an ass tattoo like
>> the rest of the working class. instead, they make billions, fund
>> socialists, and preach to us about 'social justice'.
>>
>> anyway, it's funny that the character of Dr. Strangelove should be a
>> nazi scientist and the leading brains behind the doomsday nuclear war
>> machine. shouldn't he be a jew since jews were the ones who invented
>> and built the nuclear bomb? but, i guess the jews who made the film
>> didn't wanna give us a monstrous jew as the harbinger of doom for all
>> mankind. (ironically, it's rocket science perfected by ex-nazi
>> scientists which got the free world to the moon and made us reflect on
>> the fragility of mankind on a small blue planet.) also, it was so
>> fashionable to portray an ex-nazi as the personification of perversity
>> and evil.
>>
>> yet, it's not so simple. in some ways, dr. strangelove is--and was
>> slyly meant to be--the most admirable character in the movie. he's
>> least hypocritical and most cold eyed truthful about world politics
>> and human nature. in Full Metal Jacket, an commander says 'inside
>> every gook is an american trying to get out'. in Dr. Strangelove,
>> it's like 'inside every american, there is a nazi trying to get out'.
>> but, given the nature of strangelove's brilliance, one could also say,
>> rather perversely, that 'inside every nazi is a jew trying to get
>> out'--or maybe, 'inside every jew, there is a nazi trying to get
>> out'. this is partly true because jewish kubrick used dr. strangelove
>> as his mouthpiece. if kubrick philosophically identified with any
>> character in the movie, it was dr. strangelove. this isn't to say
>> kubrick was a sociopathic psycho but to say he has a very
>> unsentimental and cold-eyed view of mankind. when he was making
>> Eyes Wide Shut, kubrick told frederic raphael that 'hitler was right
>> about everything'. he obviously didn't meant that hitler's hatred was
>> justified or that 6 million jews deserved to die. but, he agreed with
>> the nazi position that the only REAL revolution can come thru genetic
>> evolution/revolution, not thru social policy, politics, economics,
>> etc. mankind is essentially biology. spirituality is a stuff of
>> human imagination, not human genetic makeup. if spirituality is the
>> answer, it must grow within us genetically and not merely thru our
>> power to fantasize. this is why david bowman in 2001 is GENETICALLY
>> spiritualized by the mysterious alien folks.
>> as long as man fundamentally remains an hairless ape with animalistic
>> instincts, our social policies and laws can only do so much. thru
>> social ideas and policies, we can never be higher or better human
>> beings but only better-controlled human animals. but, greater
>> advances in technology also means greater ability for mankind to
>> destroy itself--with nuclear weapons and such. also, the danger of
>> science and rationalism is this silly idea that intelligent people can
>> devise social policies that can make us into better people. we saw the
>> hollowness of that idea in A Clockwork Orange. alex is programmed
>> from a dangerous human animal to a defenseless human animal than into
>> a better human being. this is all the more confused when most of
>> human creativity is fueled by animal instincts. sucking out all the
>> animalistic hormones from humans will make them less dangerous but
>> also into useless veggies without any will to do anything.
>>
>> also, what passes for liberal goodness is really founded on naivete
>> that is stupidly or willfully blind to the ruthlessness of the natural/
>> human order. for example, the reason why humans are safe from nature
>> is because we ruthlessly wiped out nature around human communities.
>> this sense of security has convinced many people to see wild animals
>> as simply wonderful, safe, and noble; so, when people actually
>> confront mean animals in nature, they are shocked. or, consider racial
>> problems in the US. during the civil rights movement, whites fooled
>> themselves into thinking whites and blacks could get along just
>> famously; after all, most blacks seem to be law-abiding and respectful
>> to honkeys. what most liberals failed to understand was that blacks
>> were ostensibly respectful and relatively self-restrained due to their
>> fear of white power and violence. once whites all turned liberalish
>> and pussified, the physically stronger blacks began to kick honkey ass
>> and rip up the racial contract of the civil rights movement.
>> and, for a long time, the western world looked upon the chinese with
>> compassion and sympathy as hopelessly poor and inept yellow sick man
>> of asia. but look at the rise of china today and their nasty national
>> and chauvanistic international policy. liberalism is willfully blind,
>> naive, and faggoty bullshi*. worse, it's been a luxury made
>> affordable by western domination of the world. even as white liberals
>> will never admit this, western liberalism would not have been possible
>> WITHOUT western domination. it was a sense of security gained thru
>> the western gun that allowed white man to delude himself that the west
>> is respected for its liberty and goodness than for its power, wealth,
>> and might. this isn't to say that might-is-right but merely to say
>> that right-must-be-backed-with-might. overly self-critical white
>> liberalism will not make non-whites respect the white man more but
>> only feel more contempt and hatred.
>>
>> because human genius and creativity is paradoxical combination of
>> aggressive animal instincts and calming spiritual wisdom, kubrick's
>> ONLY optimistic film is 2001 where david bowman is altered genetically
>> reconfigured by higher beings. even though the real secret to human
>> progress is in our genes, humans cannot succeed at bio-engineering
>> because the structure of the human brains only lead to the building of
>> more elaborate cages as we try to break out of preexisting cages. this
>> is both psychologically and socially true. all this psychanalysis
>> stuff has only caged people in new mental prisons. also, the more we
>> try to make our lives easier thru technology, the more enslaved we
>> become to technology. electicity is great, but if a power company
>> goes down, millions of us are helpless. or, consider the rising cost
>> of oil. cars are great but without oil, our entire economy shuts down
>> and we become helpless. humans are way too utilitarian in everything
>> they do. so, genetic science may simply regard man as just a living
>> machine even as we treat machines more as programmed organisms. no
>> matter how we perfect man, we cannot go beyond man; yet, the only way
>> to save humanity is to go beyond humanity. but, how can man go beyond
>> man? so, we need higher beings, as in 2001.
>>
>> also, we saw the result of man trying to achieve genetic revolution/
>> evolution in the case of nazism, and it was horrific. also, it was
>> funny that less intelligent germans were killing off more intelligent
>> jews in the name of weeding out the inferior race. so, even nazi
>> idealism wasn't true to its ideals. if intelligence was one sign of
>> racial superiority, then germans should have put jews at the top of
>> the social order. but, what really motivated nazism was germanic
>> tribalism than any real scientific understanding of human races.
>> nothing made this point clearer than the competition between aryan
>> scientists and jewish scientists during WWII. the aryans built some
>> badass heavy duty rockets but jews figured out a way to level an
>> entire city with a few ounces of nuclear material. german science was
>> badass but jewish science was awesome. japs found out too--their pagan
>> gods were no match to the god of the jews. it was like yul brynner in
>> Ten Commandments saying, 'their god IS god' after his army gets wiped
>> out in the red sea.
>>
>> so, kubrick's remark that 'hitler was right about everything' has to
>> be taken with a grain of salt. what he meant was no ideology or
>> system can really save or change man unless the man is changed at his
>> molecular/genetic core. everything else is purely cosmetic. it was
>> like undergoing plastic surgery to make an ugly face pretty, while
>> disregarding the fact that the dna code of the person is still ugly-
>> faced. for the face to be truly pretty, the dna code must be made
>> pretty. for man to be truly moral, the dna code must be reprogrammed
>> to make man wiser. but, what
>> ...
>>
>> read more »

>
> This is the anonymous intenet, and there is little (if any)
> censorship.
>
> A writer is allowed to express politically incorrect ideas.
>
> Making stereotype and racist argumentation rantings happens when a
> drunk-driving celebrity is
> caught, and let's it all hang out, and here in n.g. it's much fun to
> piss on shibboleths.
>
> So, a writer's "id" is loosened, and I admit it can be obnoxiously
> entertaining, as per the overall movie itself.
>
> The
> teutonic character--I've read--is takeoff on Edmund Teller &/or Henry
> Kissinger

> Them Jews is humorous, and no gentile could be so brilliantly
> buffoonish, except