> germans are an intelligent people but no match for the jews.  german
> science was oriented  towards teutonic technology, machinery, and
> engineering than theoretical brilliance that could really lead to some
> truly big shit.  this is why nazi germany made a lot of excellent
> planes, tanks, guns, cannons, and rockets but miserably failed in the
> race to make the atomic bomb.   the jews were the experts of the bomb
> on every level. when german scientists were captured and secretly
> observed after WWII, it became clear that the best 'aryan' minds
> hadn't a clue about nuclear science.  they were not even close.  they
> were cavemen compared to the jews.  it was like hulk hogan trying to
> be witty as woody allen. it was like polacks trying to screw on a
> lightbulb.
>
> indeed, this is why german scientists employed by US and USSR after
> the war focused on stuff like rocket technology than advanced
> theoretical stuff. consider werner von braun.  when it came to fine
> theoretical details, jews were the king. and they still are, which is
> why the computer industry is dominated by jews.  all the superduper
> billionaires in america will be jews working in hightech, and they're
> gonna use their tremendous amount of money earned thru hypercapitalism
> to, ironically, fund socialism. jews are funny this way.  part of them
> wanna make all the money, and another part of them want to control
> society like a giant laboratory according to their social theories.
> money-loving jews go into capitalism, and idea-loving jews write the
> books.  money-loving jews read the books of idea-loving jews and also
> fund the idea-loving jews(who are leftist). so, we have jewish
> hypercapitalism supporting jewish socialism.  jews rise above us and
> then preach to us about equality. if george soros and sergei brin
> wanna be equal, they should work at walmart and get an ass tattoo like
> the rest of the working class. instead, they make billions, fund
> socialists, and preach to us about 'social justice'.
>
> anyway, it's funny that the character of Dr. Strangelove should be a
> nazi scientist and the leading brains behind the doomsday nuclear war
> machine.  shouldn't he be a jew since jews were the ones who invented
> and built the nuclear bomb?  but, i guess the jews who made the film
> didn't wanna give us a monstrous jew as the harbinger of doom for all
> mankind. (ironically, it's rocket science perfected by ex-nazi
> scientists which got the free world to the moon and made us reflect on
> the fragility of mankind on a small blue planet.)   also, it was so
> fashionable to portray an ex-nazi as the personification of perversity
> and evil.
>
> yet, it's not so simple. in some ways, dr. strangelove is--and was
> slyly meant to be--the most admirable character in the movie.  he's
> least hypocritical and most cold eyed truthful about world politics
> and human nature.  in Full Metal Jacket, an commander says 'inside
> every gook is an american trying to get out'.  in Dr. Strangelove,
> it's like 'inside every american, there is a nazi trying to get out'.
> but, given the nature of strangelove's brilliance, one could also say,
> rather perversely, that 'inside every nazi is a jew trying to get
> out'--or maybe, 'inside every jew, there is a nazi trying to get
> out'.  this is partly true because jewish kubrick used dr. strangelove
> as his mouthpiece. if kubrick philosophically identified with any
> character in the movie, it was dr. strangelove.  this isn't to say
> kubrick was a sociopathic psycho but to say he has a very
> unsentimental and cold-eyed view of mankind.    when he was making
> Eyes Wide Shut, kubrick told frederic raphael that 'hitler was right
> about everything'.  he obviously didn't meant that hitler's hatred was
> justified or that 6 million jews deserved to die. but, he agreed with
> the nazi position that the only REAL revolution can come thru genetic
> evolution/revolution, not thru social policy, politics, economics,
> etc.    mankind is essentially biology. spirituality is a stuff of
> human imagination, not human genetic makeup.  if spirituality is the
> answer, it must grow within us genetically and not merely thru our
> power to fantasize. this is why david bowman in 2001 is GENETICALLY
> spiritualized by the mysterious alien folks.
> as long as man fundamentally remains an hairless ape with animalistic
> instincts, our social policies and laws can only do so much.  thru
> social ideas and policies, we can never be higher or better human
> beings but only better-controlled human animals.  but, greater
> advances in technology also means greater ability for mankind to
> destroy itself--with nuclear weapons and such. also, the danger of
> science and rationalism is this silly idea that intelligent people can
> devise social policies that can make us into better people. we saw the
> hollowness of that idea in A Clockwork Orange.  alex is programmed
> from a dangerous human animal to a defenseless human animal than into
> a better human being.  this is all the more confused when most of
> human creativity is fueled by animal instincts.  sucking out all the
> animalistic hormones from humans will make them less dangerous but
> also into useless veggies without any will to do anything.
>
> also, what passes for liberal goodness is really founded on naivete
> that is stupidly or willfully blind to the ruthlessness of the natural/
> human order.  for example, the reason why humans are safe from nature
> is because we ruthlessly wiped out nature around human communities.
> this sense of security has convinced many people to see wild animals
> as simply wonderful, safe, and noble; so, when people actually
> confront mean animals in nature, they are shocked. or, consider racial
> problems in the US.  during the civil rights movement, whites fooled
> themselves into thinking whites and blacks could get along just
> famously; after all, most blacks seem to be law-abiding and respectful
> to honkeys. what most liberals failed to understand was that blacks
> were ostensibly respectful and relatively self-restrained due to their
> fear of white power and violence. once whites all turned liberalish
> and pussified, the physically stronger blacks began to kick honkey ass
> and rip up the racial contract of the civil rights movement.
> and, for a long time, the western world looked upon the chinese with
> compassion and sympathy as hopelessly poor and inept yellow sick man
> of asia. but look at the rise of china today and their nasty national
> and chauvanistic international policy.  liberalism is willfully blind,
> naive, and faggoty bullshi*.  worse, it's been a luxury made
> affordable by western domination of the world.  even as white liberals
> will never admit this, western liberalism would not have been possible
> WITHOUT western domination.  it was a sense of security gained thru
> the western gun that allowed white man to delude himself that the west
> is respected for its liberty and goodness than for its power, wealth,
> and might. this isn't to say that might-is-right but merely to say
> that right-must-be-backed-with-might.   overly self-critical white
> liberalism will not make non-whites respect the white man more but
> only feel more contempt and hatred.
>
> because human genius and creativity is paradoxical combination of
> aggressive animal instincts and calming spiritual wisdom, kubrick's
> ONLY optimistic film is 2001 where david bowman is altered genetically
> reconfigured by higher beings.   even though the real secret to human
> progress is in our genes, humans cannot succeed at bio-engineering
> because the structure of the human brains only lead to the building of
> more elaborate cages as we try to break out of preexisting cages. this
> is both psychologically and socially true.  all this psychanalysis
> stuff has only caged people in new mental prisons. also, the more we
> try to make our lives easier thru technology, the more enslaved we
> become to technology.  electicity is great, but if a power company
> goes down, millions of us are helpless. or, consider the rising cost
> of oil. cars are great but without oil, our entire economy shuts down
> and we become helpless.  humans are way too utilitarian in everything
> they do.  so, genetic science may simply regard man as just a living
> machine even as we treat machines more as programmed organisms.  no
> matter how we perfect man, we cannot go beyond man; yet, the only way
> to save humanity is to go beyond humanity. but, how can man go beyond
> man? so, we need higher beings, as in 2001.
>
> also, we saw the result of man trying to achieve genetic revolution/
> evolution in the case of nazism, and it was horrific. also, it was
> funny that less intelligent germans were killing off more intelligent
> jews in the name of weeding out the inferior race.  so, even nazi
> idealism wasn't true to its ideals. if intelligence was one sign of
> racial superiority, then germans should have put jews at the top of
> the social order.  but, what really motivated nazism was germanic
> tribalism than any real scientific understanding of human races.
> nothing made this point clearer than the competition between aryan
> scientists and jewish scientists during WWII.  the aryans built some
> badass heavy duty rockets but jews figured out a way to level an
> entire city with a few ounces of nuclear material.  german science was
> badass but jewish science was awesome. japs found out too--their pagan
> gods were no match to the god of the jews.  it was like yul brynner in
> Ten Commandments saying, 'their god IS god' after his army gets wiped
> out in the red sea.
>
> so, kubrick's remark that 'hitler was right about everything' has to
> be taken with a grain of salt.  what he meant was no ideology or
> system can really save or change man unless the man is changed at his
> molecular/genetic core.  everything else is purely cosmetic.  it was
> like undergoing plastic surgery to make an ugly face pretty, while
> disregarding the fact that the dna code of the person is still ugly-
> faced. for the face to be truly pretty, the dna code must be made
> pretty. for man to be truly moral, the dna code must be reprogrammed
> to make man wiser.  but, what
> ...
>
> read more »