germans are an intelligent people but no match for the jews. german
science was oriented towards teutonic technology, machinery, and
engineering than theoretical brilliance that could really lead to some
truly big shit. this is why nazi germany made a lot of excellent
planes, tanks, guns, cannons, and rockets but miserably failed in the
race to make the atomic bomb. the jews were the experts of the bomb
on every level. when german scientists were captured and secretly
observed after WWII, it became clear that the best 'aryan' minds
hadn't a clue about nuclear science. they were not even close. they
were cavemen compared to the jews. it was like hulk hogan trying to
be witty as woody allen. it was like polacks trying to screw on a
lightbulb.

indeed, this is why german scientists employed by US and USSR after
the war focused on stuff like rocket technology than advanced
theoretical stuff. consider werner von braun. when it came to fine
theoretical details, jews were the king. and they still are, which is
why the computer industry is dominated by jews. all the superduper
billionaires in america will be jews working in hightech, and they're
gonna use their tremendous amount of money earned thru hypercapitalism
to, ironically, fund socialism. jews are funny this way. part of them
wanna make all the money, and another part of them want to control
society like a giant laboratory according to their social theories.
money-loving jews go into capitalism, and idea-loving jews write the
books. money-loving jews read the books of idea-loving jews and also
fund the idea-loving jews(who are leftist). so, we have jewish
hypercapitalism supporting jewish socialism. jews rise above us and
then preach to us about equality. if george soros and sergei brin
wanna be equal, they should work at walmart and get an ass tattoo like
the rest of the working class. instead, they make billions, fund
socialists, and preach to us about 'social justice'.

anyway, it's funny that the character of Dr. Strangelove should be a
nazi scientist and the leading brains behind the doomsday nuclear war
machine. shouldn't he be a jew since jews were the ones who invented
and built the nuclear bomb? but, i guess the jews who made the film
didn't wanna give us a monstrous jew as the harbinger of doom for all
mankind. (ironically, it's rocket science perfected by ex-nazi
scientists which got the free world to the moon and made us reflect on
the fragility of mankind on a small blue planet.) also, it was so
fashionable to portray an ex-nazi as the personification of perversity
and evil.

yet, it's not so simple. in some ways, dr. strangelove is--and was
slyly meant to be--the most admirable character in the movie. he's
least hypocritical and most cold eyed truthful about world politics
and human nature. in Full Metal Jacket, an commander says 'inside
every gook is an american trying to get out'. in Dr. Strangelove,
it's like 'inside every american, there is a nazi trying to get out'.
but, given the nature of strangelove's brilliance, one could also say,
rather perversely, that 'inside every nazi is a jew trying to get
out'--or maybe, 'inside every jew, there is a nazi trying to get
out'. this is partly true because jewish kubrick used dr. strangelove
as his mouthpiece. if kubrick philosophically identified with any
character in the movie, it was dr. strangelove. this isn't to say
kubrick was a sociopathic psycho but to say he has a very
unsentimental and cold-eyed view of mankind. when he was making
Eyes Wide Shut, kubrick told frederic raphael that 'hitler was right
about everything'. he obviously didn't meant that hitler's hatred was
justified or that 6 million jews deserved to die. but, he agreed with
the nazi position that the only REAL revolution can come thru genetic
evolution/revolution, not thru social policy, politics, economics,
etc. mankind is essentially biology. spirituality is a stuff of
human imagination, not human genetic makeup. if spirituality is the
answer, it must grow within us genetically and not merely thru our
power to fantasize. this is why david bowman in 2001 is GENETICALLY
spiritualized by the mysterious alien folks.
as long as man fundamentally remains an hairless ape with animalistic
instincts, our social policies and laws can only do so much. thru
social ideas and policies, we can never be higher or better human
beings but only better-controlled human animals. but, greater
advances in technology also means greater ability for mankind to
destroy itself--with nuclear weapons and such. also, the danger of
science and rationalism is this silly idea that intelligent people can
devise social policies that can make us into better people. we saw the
hollowness of that idea in A Clockwork Orange. alex is programmed
from a dangerous human animal to a defenseless human animal than into
a better human being. this is all the more confused when most of
human creativity is fueled by animal instincts. sucking out all the
animalistic hormones from humans will make them less dangerous but
also into useless veggies without any will to do anything.

also, what passes for liberal goodness is really founded on naivete
that is stupidly or willfully blind to the ruthlessness of the natural/
human order. for example, the reason why humans are safe from nature
is because we ruthlessly wiped out nature around human communities.
this sense of security has convinced many people to see wild animals
as simply wonderful, safe, and noble; so, when people actually
confront mean animals in nature, they are shocked. or, consider racial
problems in the US. during the civil rights movement, whites fooled
themselves into thinking whites and blacks could get along just
famously; after all, most blacks seem to be law-abiding and respectful
to honkeys. what most liberals failed to understand was that blacks
were ostensibly respectful and relatively self-restrained due to their
fear of white power and violence. once whites all turned liberalish
and pussified, the physically stronger blacks began to kick honkey ass
and rip up the racial contract of the civil rights movement.
and, for a long time, the western world looked upon the chinese with
compassion and sympathy as hopelessly poor and inept yellow sick man
of asia. but look at the rise of china today and their nasty national
and chauvanistic international policy. liberalism is willfully blind,
naive, and faggoty bullshi*. worse, it's been a luxury made
affordable by western domination of the world. even as white liberals
will never admit this, western liberalism would not have been possible
WITHOUT western domination. it was a sense of security gained thru
the western gun that allowed white man to delude himself that the west
is respected for its liberty and goodness than for its power, wealth,
and might. this isn't to say that might-is-right but merely to say
that right-must-be-backed-with-might. overly self-critical white
liberalism will not make non-whites respect the white man more but
only feel more contempt and hatred.

because human genius and creativity is paradoxical combination of
aggressive animal instincts and calming spiritual wisdom, kubrick's
ONLY optimistic film is 2001 where david bowman is altered genetically
reconfigured by higher beings. even though the real secret to human
progress is in our genes, humans cannot succeed at bio-engineering
because the structure of the human brains only lead to the building of
more elaborate cages as we try to break out of preexisting cages. this
is both psychologically and socially true. all this psychanalysis
stuff has only caged people in new mental prisons. also, the more we
try to make our lives easier thru technology, the more enslaved we
become to technology. electicity is great, but if a power company
goes down, millions of us are helpless. or, consider the rising cost
of oil. cars are great but without oil, our entire economy shuts down
and we become helpless. humans are way too utilitarian in everything
they do. so, genetic science may simply regard man as just a living
machine even as we treat machines more as programmed organisms. no
matter how we perfect man, we cannot go beyond man; yet, the only way
to save humanity is to go beyond humanity. but, how can man go beyond
man? so, we need higher beings, as in 2001.

also, we saw the result of man trying to achieve genetic revolution/
evolution in the case of nazism, and it was horrific. also, it was
funny that less intelligent germans were killing off more intelligent
jews in the name of weeding out the inferior race. so, even nazi
idealism wasn't true to its ideals. if intelligence was one sign of
racial superiority, then germans should have put jews at the top of
the social order. but, what really motivated nazism was germanic
tribalism than any real scientific understanding of human races.
nothing made this point clearer than the competition between aryan
scientists and jewish scientists during WWII. the aryans built some
badass heavy duty rockets but jews figured out a way to level an
entire city with a few ounces of nuclear material. german science was
badass but jewish science was awesome. japs found out too--their pagan
gods were no match to the god of the jews. it was like yul brynner in
Ten Commandments saying, 'their god IS god' after his army gets wiped
out in the red sea.

so, kubrick's remark that 'hitler was right about everything' has to
be taken with a grain of salt. what he meant was no ideology or
system can really save or change man unless the man is changed at his
molecular/genetic core. everything else is purely cosmetic. it was
like undergoing plastic surgery to make an ugly face pretty, while
disregarding the fact that the dna code of the person is still ugly-
faced. for the face to be truly pretty, the dna code must be made
pretty. for man to be truly moral, the dna code must be reprogrammed
to make man wiser. but, what is the secret? hitler didn't know. he
was more like gay texas chainsaw massacre dude pretending to be an
expert surgeon. and, the scientists in A Clockwork Orange didn't know
either; they only perfected a method of behavioralism which
manipulated only the external mechanisms thru crude biochemistry. so,
kubrick could only be hopeful by inventing higher beings from another
world in 2001 Space Odyssey.

but, there was something of a kinship between kubrick, hitler, and dr.
strangelove. kubrick, like the crazy nazis, had little trust in human
nature. he had a very grim, even brutal view of humanity. kubrick was
no humanist nor a sentimentalist. he was certainly capable of empathy
but not real sympathy. if spielberg identified mainly with david in
AI, kubrick surely identified most with the scientist who done created
david.
also, he may have agreed with hitler except on the matter of the
superior race. the superior race was not the aryan but the jew.
though he could never say admit it publicly, kubrick was kinda like a
jewish hitler who saw jews at the top of the racial hierarchy. this
isn't to say that he was murderous and genocidal. but, he clearly did
see hierarchy as the essence in nature and among humans. kubrick was
into the nietzsche thing. so, more accurately, kubrick was more like a
jewish nietzsche than a jewish hitler. he rejected the notion of
equality of the races or 'all men are created equal'. unlike hitler
though, he was curious about all peoples and cultures. like hitler, he
saw biology as far more deterministic of history than ideas; indeed,
even ideas were shaped by biology. the reason why black africans
never produced a moses, buddha, jesus, or socrates is largely due to
black emotional and intellectual makeup. the reason why chinese never
produced a coltrane is because chiners have a different set of
collective auditory archetypes stamped in their psyche. there are two
kinds of ability. ability that grows from with and ability that is
learned or mimicked. anyone can mimic, learn, and even master jazz,
but only the black genetic soul could create it from within.
similarly, while negroes can learn the wisdom of jesus, blacks
couldn't have come up with that stuff because it's hard for a negro to
sit still for 40 days and meditate on the meaning of life. all of
human knowledge and ability is a combination of ingrown ability and
imported ability. this is why, even as japs imported western ways,
they still do in a japanese way. and, this isn't merely a cultural
matter but a genetic matter. japanese culture turned out the way it
did party due to the natural inclination of japanese genes. take bob
and james. bob is wild, crazy, and extroverted and comes up with
great drum music. james is quiet, withdrawn, and meditative and comes
up with a spiritual idea. bob can learn from james but is much less
likely to come up with james's ideas. james can learn from bob but is
much less likely to come up with bob's drum rhythms. indeed, this is
why pussyboy whites worship black music; it's something that
faggotyass white boys couldn't have come up with on their own.

both kubrick's view and hitler's view had common roots in the idea of
the nietzschean superman. notice that in 2001, it is one superior ape
that first figures out that a bone can be mighty instrument.
even if kubrick wasn't murderous, psychotic, or genocidal, he was
contemptuous of most of humanity.(on the set of Eyes Wide Shut, he
treated tom cruise and nicole kidman as porn pawns on a chessboard.)
kubrick also shut himself off from the rest of the world. also, while
he asked help from others, he rarely reciprocated. in all his movies,
there isn't much regard for mankind. a movie like A Clockwork Orange
is especially vicious. perhaps, the movie would have been more
feasible morally had it been directed by a lesser talent. directed by
kubrick with mind-blowing brilliance and originality, moral matters
became secondary to the spectacle of alex's charismatic showmanship.
the movie became a kind of Triumph of the Swill. though evil, alex
registers as a superdude who smashes conventional rules because such
are only for boring, dull, insipid, naive, softheaded morons or
stiffnecks. at one point, alex beats up a useless drunkard. when he
attacks the good-hearted writer and his wife, we can't help feeling,
'what a couple of stupid, do-goody, naive liberals!!' who deserve to
be punished for their stupid trust of humanity. later, when we meet
the writer again as a bitter vengeful man, he seems worse and more
deranged than david. in this universe, goodness can either be naive or
easily wiped out by grim social reality.

anyway, kubrick wasn't just happy to be jewish nietzschean. a part of
him felt that jews were the REAL ubermensch, but another part of him
desired for the aryan. part of it was sexual. he felt that in terms
of beauty, aryans had a certain advantage over the jew. so, he
married a german wife. he supplied the brains, she supplied the
looks. kubrick wasn't just an intellectual genius but always had an
eye for beauty. he started out as a photographer and loved art all
his life. he loved cerebral modern art but also classical and
traditional art whose central themes were beauty. also, kubrick
admired strength and power. one of his first films was about boxing.
so, while he knew that jews were intellectual ubermensch, they were
not ubermensch of beauty and strength.
this is why Dr. Strangelove is such a strange character. he is the
anxious product of creative union of jewishism and aryanism. it's a
jew trying to break out the aryan, and the aryan trying to break out
of the jew. he has jewish smarts but aryan spirit.
spirit is important here because kubrick has tremendous appreciation
for artistic creativity. though the main creatives forces of the
modern world were jewish, kubrick had to admit that goyim thru the
centuries had come up with stuff that even super jewish intelligence
couldn't touch--greek architecture, aspects of roman civilization,
german classical music, etc. just how did less intelligent goyim
come up with that shi*? and, how come even the greatest jewish brain
cannot reach the heights of talents like beethoven and shakespeare?
this may be the real nature of harold bloom's obsession with
shakespeare. bloom knows that the greatest brains are jews. yet, the
greatest writer of all time was shakespeare. just how did a goy do
that? it's like a negro pondering the phenomenon of larry bird.
of course, bloom knows that there have been many great goy writers
thru history--indeed, far more than great jewish writers. but, bloom
could understand the operative secret of most great goy writers--
figure out what made them tick. also, bloom could explain the
relative late start of jewish creativity due to religious dogmatism
and/or goy discrimination. but, how do you explain the genius of
shakespeare which is beyond what bloom's superhigh jewish IQ can
figure out? in a way, bloom may be hinting, rather cryptically, that
maybe, just maybe, shakespeare was a jew or front for a jew--similar
to his notion that the genesis may have been written by a woman.

anyway, though kubrick was proud of his jewish powers he wasn't
necessarily proud of his jewishness. he saw too much of jewish
society and culture as grubby and crass(money worshipping hollywood
producers), too pushy and self-righteous(leftwing and radical jews),
too vulgar and shameless(entertainment jews), and just downright ugly
and repulsive.
he loved his jewish powers of intellect but was ambivlaent about
jewish culture and attitudes. he grew up in NY but settled in a
mansion in a quiet english town. part of him wanted the dignified
gentlemanly english life. part of him was always the topsy turvy
creative NY jew. he never took on english manners and accent like T.
S. Eliot did.
but, kubrick didn't just wanna be a jew jew. aesthetically, he
preferred the aryan ideal. 2001 has solid white males as heroes than
grubby looking jews. and, in a way, The Shining about was about
jewish anxiety in the House of Privileged Goyim. even as nicholson is
king of the overlook hotel during winter, he doesn't really belong
there. and, no matter how much he tries to devote himself to
creativity, he can't help feeling that what really matters in life is
power, wealth, privilege, and etc as represented by the hotel.
so, kubrick wanted to be more than a jew. he wanted to be an aryan
jew. he was afflicted with the hannah arendt syndrome of worship of
german culture. yet, it was this crazy passion for german culture
that led to the destruction of jewry in WWII. so, it was a difficult
issue for kubrick to fathom. yet, deep in his heart, he shared some of
the same passions as german culture worshippers that led to nazism and
the holocaust. can one love/admire/worship german culture and still be
a jew? don't all cultures come with certain built-in prejudices and
biases? after all, it's difficult to worship jewish culture and
jewish god AND embrace polytheism. was there a strong strain of mono-
racialism at the core of german artistic genius and beauty? what did
this mean for the jew who loved german culture?
perhaps, the only answer was the fusion of jew and german genes--as in
the case of kubrick and his german wife. would this lead to the best
of both worlds? or, would it undermine or violate the best of both?
take sarah jessica parker, a blonde jewess. she's disgusting! an ugly
jewess is better than an ugly jewess adorned with touches of aryanism.
but then, there's paul newman, an almost perfectly beautiful creature
with best of aryan and semitic traits.
though tom cruise isn't very jewish looking, he partly represented
jewish anxiety in Eyes Wide Shut. he's a short dark haired
guy--'jewish'--married to a tall blonde aryan goddess type, which is
rather like kubrick with his german wife. this may be one of the
reasons why kubrick avoided the public eye--he knew that he would look
stupid walking next to his wife.
but, tom cruise only partly embodies jewish anxiety in Eyes Wide Shut.
the other part of his duality embodies the anxiety of the earnest goy
in a world that is ruled by a ultra-aryan/jewish fusion of assholes.
the mansion of fancy fuc*ery is where the big guns of old wasp power
and new jew power come together to slobber all over the best looking
pussies around the world. it's where the brains get the beauties.
brains gain the most riches and power. riches and power afford the
best pussies. is this right or wrong? is it as it should be or as it
just is?

so, what is to be done? can mankind be saved? can any idea or value
system save us? a better social policy? such can improve our lot but
cannot make us better. the only hope for improvement is thru
genetics, and that means reproduction. we don't know which child will
be born with the new mutations that will be the genetic basis for
higher man. but, such child may one day be born. so, all we can do is
cross our fingers, 'FUC*', and hope, as nicole kidman suggests at the
end of the movie. maybe, just maybe, out of the billions of new kids,
there will be the Star Child. so, we should learn to stop worrying and
do some fuc*ing.