On Sep 16, 12:48Â am, janpa...@
gmail.com wrote:
> On Sep 15, 11:22Â pm, bob young
netvigator.com> wrote:
> ...> The uncertainly is due to the fact that man has made up all of his gods......
>
>> Here are just a few of his...... 'A' gods:
>
>> Aeron War [goddess] Wales War
>> Aeval [goddess] Love, Magic. Ireland
>> Ahura Mazda
>> Agrona [goddesss] Destroyer of life
>> Achall [goddess]Earth and Nature; unhappiness. Ireland
>> Achtan [goddess] Hunting and wild animals. Ireland
>
> ...
> ...> Agamemnon Greek
>> Agasaya [goddess] Semite
>> Agave [goddess] Greek............
> ...
>> "I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one
>> fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will
>> understand why I dismiss yours."
>> [Stephen Roberts]
>
> ...
> NO, I am NOT an atheist - I would NOT dare. After all, I am this
> scientist who has proven formally the existence of God (see the web
> page "god.htm" indicated below). Also I already know what God does to
> these people who fulfil the God's definition of "atheists". I would
> NOT like to be in their skin. So when talking about atheists, for sure
> you can minus one person - myself.
>
> When your long list of "gods" is concerned, it only confirms the main
> thesis of this thread - namely that the only God maintains all people
> in the lack of certainty about His existence. So you also took wrong
> this list - it does NOT certify at all what you intended to certify
> with it. By the way, on my web page "god.htm" (e.g. see it at the
>
addresshttp://jan-pajak.com/god.htm) there is an exact definition of
> what God really is. Most of "gods" from the list you provided do NOT
> meet this definition.
>
> With the totaliztic salute,
> Jan Pajak
Your "god" proof is ludicrous...it ignores counterevidence, loaded
with special pleading, and is circular logic. You fail.
Hatter