Re: Why Electric Motors Are 3X - 4X More Efficient Than Internal Combustion
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Why Electric Motors Are 3X - 4X More Efficient Than Internal Combustion         

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: bud--
Date: Aug 18, 2008 13:14

stratus46@yahoo.com wrote:
> bud-- wrote:
>> BretCahill@peoplepc.com wrote:
>>>
>>> Far and away the biggest problem comes from the basic
> thermocycles of
>>> adiabatic engines, i. e., gas turbines (Brayton/Joule/Ericsson
> I),
>>> diesel (Diesel) and spark ignition (Otto).
>>
>> The Prius uses a 4 stroke Atkinson cycle engine. Like a
> conventional
>> Otto engine, the air-fuel mix is optimum. But like a diesel there
> is no
>> throttle plate. Not pumping air past a throttle plate is supposed
> to be
>> one reason Atkinson has a higher efficiency. The effective
> compression
>> ratio (and power) are controlled by intake valve timing.
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atkinson_cycle
>>
>> --
>> bud--
>
> Isn't his a throttle plate? Sure looks like it to me.
>
> http://techno-fandom.org/~hobbit/cars/tb/tps/
>

Is it the current engine model?

My recollection is that the intake valve closed earlier for high power
and later for low power but in a brief search I didn’t find a source.

The Wikipedia entry for the "Hybrid Synergy Drive" used by Prius
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_Synergy_Drive
(Performance) "the Atkinson cycle engine itself was also designed
specifically to minimize engine drag via an offset crankshaft to
minimize piston drag during the power stroke, and a unique intake system
to prevent drag caused by manifold vacuum versus the normal Otto cycle
in most engines."
The "unique intake system" is not described.

You may be right that there is a throttle plate, I don’t know.

--
bud--
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!