> om !not-for-mail
> From: duke cox.net>

> Subject: Re: Why does god hate amputees? (Re: Contraception: It's Wrong? Why??)
> Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 05:56:24 -0500

> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Lines: 28
> Organization: ThunderNews.com
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@ThunderNews.com
> Xref: news.arizona.edu alt.atheism:1834939 alt.abortion:502386 alt.california:353315
>
> On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 00:03:05 +0000 (UTC), cary@afone.as.arizona.edu (Cary
> Kittrell) wrote:
>

>>> Only my God offers me love and no greater love can one offer another than to ...

> In article writes:

>> om !not-for-mail
>> From: duke cox.net>

> Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic,alt.atheism,alt.abortion,alt.philosophy,alt.california

>> Subject: Re: Why does god hate amputees? (Re: Contraception: It's Wrong? Why??)
>> Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 05:56:24 -0500

> References: <3hvuu3t5vtp1f3hf5ha4qr2obtfi9a97sn@4ax.com> 4ax.com> <6eevu3h7gfk5ktm64mjqddiht218erdl04@4ax.com> 4ax.com> 4ax.com> 4ax.com> 4ax.com> 4ax.com> 4ax.com> onion.ccit.arizona.edu> 4ax.com>

>> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>> Lines: 28
>> Organization: ThunderNews.com
>> X-Complaints-To: abuse@ThunderNews.com
>> Xref: news.arizona.edu alt.atheism:1834939 alt.abortion:502386 alt.california:353315
>>
>> On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 00:03:05 +0000 (UTC), cary@afone.as.arizona.edu (Cary
>> Kittrell) wrote:
>> ...

>>>Of course, none of those offering money, power, or beauty love you
>>>so very much that they will throw you onto an eternal bonfire if you do
>>>not do as they wish.

>>
>> Nope, no throwing you into the bonfire.

>
>You know, that Jesus guy disagees with you on this one. In fact,
>I have quoted you the exact passage several times before, remember?
>That one where He says, "Then shall he say also unto them on the
>left hand" -- those "on the left hand" being `Christians' who failed
>to feed the hungry, take in the stranger, visit the imprisoned --
>"Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye
>cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels"

> On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 16:15:58 +0000 (UTC), cary@afone.as.arizona.edu (Cary
> Kittrell) wrote:
>

>>>> Of course, none of those offering money, power, or beauty love you
>>>> so very much that they will throw you onto an eternal bonfire if you do
>>>> not do as they wish.

>>> Nope, no throwing you into the bonfire.

>> You know, that Jesus guy disagees with you on this one. In fact,
>> I have quoted you the exact passage several times before, remember?
>> That one where He says, "Then shall he say also unto them on the
>> left hand" -- those "on the left hand" being `Christians' who failed
>> to feed the hungry, take in the stranger, visit the imprisoned --
>> "Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye
>> cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels"

>
> That is their chosen alternative. Gee, a simple thing like visiting the needy
> or lending a helping hand, and you "goats" say no.
> \

>> I keep telling you, you REALLY ought to try reading the thing. ...

>
> On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 16:15:58 +0000 (UTC), cary@afone.as.arizona.edu (Cary
> Kittrell) wrote:
>

>>>>Of course, none of those offering money, power, or beauty love you
>>>>so very much that they will throw you onto an eternal bonfire if you do
>>>>not do as they wish.

>>>
>>> Nope, no throwing you into the bonfire.

>>
>>You know, that Jesus guy disagees with you on this one. In fact,
>>I have quoted you the exact passage several times before, remember?
>>That one where He says, "Then shall he say also unto them on the
>>left hand" -- those "on the left hand" being `Christians' who failed
>>to feed the hungry, take in the stranger, visit the imprisoned --
>>"Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye
>>cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels"

>
> That is their chosen alternative. Gee, a simple thing like visiting the needy ...

>>>I keep telling you, you REALLY ought to try reading the thing.
>>>It's not all that hard. In this case, try Matthew 25.

>> Know it very well.

>Dozens of exchanges over the years have demonstrated -- repeatedly --
>your startling ignorance of the Bible. My favorite example was
>your complete lack of awareness of God's ever having ordered whole
>peoples to be slaughtered, down to the last male baby. (virgins excepted)

>I realize that traditionally, Catholics are not encouraged to
>study the Bible in the same way that Protestants -- and particularly
>Evangelicals -- are, but if you're going to argue Christianity, you'd
>better start cracking the textbook.

>>>> His loving children are welcomed to spend all eternity with him. Those that say
>>>> "no thanks", well...............you know the rest of the story.

>>>Yep. Into the "everlasting fire".

>> You leap. He doesn't push you.

>
> On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 21:52:50 +0000 (UTC), cary@afone.as.arizona.edu (Cary
> Kittrell) wrote:
>

>>>>I keep telling you, you REALLY ought to try reading the thing.
>>>>It's not all that hard. In this case, try Matthew 25.

>>> Know it very well.

>

>>Dozens of exchanges over the years have demonstrated -- repeatedly --
>>your startling ignorance of the Bible. My favorite example was
>>your complete lack of awareness of God's ever having ordered whole
>>peoples to be slaughtered, down to the last male baby. (virgins excepted)

>
> Nah, God has never done that.

> On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 21:52:50 +0000 (UTC), cary@afone.as.arizona.edu (Cary
> Kittrell) wrote:
>

>>>> I keep telling you, you REALLY ought to try reading the thing.
>>>> It's not all that hard. In this case, try Matthew 25.

>>> Know it very well.

>

>> Dozens of exchanges over the years have demonstrated -- repeatedly --
>> your startling ignorance of the Bible. My favorite example was
>> your complete lack of awareness of God's ever having ordered whole
>> peoples to be slaughtered, down to the last male baby. (virgins excepted)

>
> Nah, God has never done that.

>>>Dozens of exchanges over the years have demonstrated -- repeatedly --
>>>your startling ignorance of the Bible. My favorite example was
>>>your complete lack of awareness of God's ever having ordered whole
>>>peoples to be slaughtered, down to the last male baby. (virgins excepted)

>> Nah, God has never done that.

> And you keep claiming that you know the Bible. ..
>
> Now therefore kill every male among the little ones,
> and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him.
> But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying
> with him, keep alive for yourselves."

>And since you know the Bible so well, you will know that
>this was the SECOND time the army of the Hebrews was
>told to do this. They showed some mercy the first
>time around, and THAT caused a huge hissy fit.