On Sep 16, 1:24Â am, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sep 15, 7:36 am,zinnicgate.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Sep 15, 1:45 am, "curmudgeon" bresnan.net> wrote:
>
>>> "To beat the skeptics at their own game, let's doubt absolutely everything
>>> we
>>> know, in order to discover what knowledge we can be certain of."
>
>>> Rene Descartes   1596 - 1650
>
>>> Rene Descartes was a Rationalist, meaning that he believed that you can know
>>> things without having to rely on senses experience.
>>> Those are called innate ideas, or primary ideas.
>>> Other information gathered from experience is called secondary.
>
>>> Rene Descartes also believed that everything that he knew, or believed he
>>> knew, came from his senses, and sensory experience is inherently suspect.
>
>> In my experience, to admit that one is not  CERTAIN of anything still
>> leaves a pragmatic approximation that serves life well enough!
>
> Are you certain that we are not certain? If it is undertiminable then we may or may not be certainly right, but we cannot tell which.-
How many times must we go round the mulberry bush if we are not
certain of our uncertainty? I cut my losses a long time ago and opted
for the 'certainty' of uncerrtain approximations! : {