In 1950 It was predicted Fusion will be achieved in 20-30 years.

Later in 1980 Again it was predicted Fusion reactor will be possible
in 20-30 years.

Later in 2000 Again it was predicted Fusion reator will give infinite
cheap energy in 20 year.

Time keep passing and we are not seeing any good progress.

Is it because of Couroption that it failed?

Or there is any technical Problem.

Once I read SuperComputers will help in designing Fusion Reactor.
Today we have PetaFlop Computers are they of no use in designing
Fusion Reactor?

What are the things stopping in developing a Commercial Reactor.

Today Robotics & Computer field is so advanced still why it is so
costly to design a Fusion Reactor.

There are so many ways to create it By Laser/ By Plasma and other
techniques why no good result is Comming.

Is it due to any Conspiracy or Corruption that this work is delayed?

Bye
Sanny

On Apr 22, 11:52 am, Sanny hotmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 22, 8:52 am, Sanny hotmail.com> wrote:

Sanny wrote:

[snip]

That has remained true for every year since. Don't you like
consistency?

[snip rest]

In electronics, tolerances average. Computers exist.

In magnetohydrodynamics (economics, meteorology, sociology),
tolerences add. Desktop fusor or the sun, it's a guaranteed
untameable mess that does not improve with scaling. A centrally
managed economy will go to shit (and much more so for escalated
Federal intervention), the mid-West will be smashed by floods and
tornadoes, and as we burn food for fuel,

http://www2.nysun.com/article/74994

Syphilis and gonorrhea are neither subtle nor desirable. Both are
entirely curable. How can they persist as selectively transmitted
diseases? Controlled fusion will never exist for the same reasons.

Dear Sanny:

On Apr 22, 8:52 am, Sanny hotmail.com> wrote:

And it was... in bombs.

Done, just not self-sustaining.

Nope, physics. Fusion of heavy nucleii releases hordes of neutrons,
which make everything nearby radioactive.

Yep.

On Apr 22, 10:52 am, Sanny hotmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 22, 2:06 pm, PD gmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 22, 2:57 pm, dlzc cox.net> wrote:

David lies. It has been squelched as so many developments are which
have political implications. There is NO greater and more important
implication than the destruction of the control of the world through
energy sources (Oil, coal,etc). Any decent (meaning simple and
inexpensive) fusion device would be impossible to control and hence
impossible to be used to control the world. Such a device would have
to be hidden through conspiracy, corruption and ignorance.

On Apr 22, 5:20 pm, Benj iwaynet.net> wrote:

"Benj" iwaynet.net> wrote in message
news:d6c706d8-f105-48d0-b79a-4a076908906b@k13g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
...

You have exactly 1 post to make good on this claim, or apologize.
Your ISP may or may not hear about your decision.

David A. Smith