THE NEW REPUBLIC further editorializes:
http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20061030&s=editorial103006
Optimism Gap
by the Editors
Post date 10.23.06 | Issue date 10.30.06 Discuss this article (1)
Printer friendly
E-mail this article
I am an optimist," proclaimed Ban Ki-moon, the new secretary-general of
the United Nations, in his introductory speech to the General Assembly
last Friday. He will certainly fit right in. What has taken place at
Turtle Bay over the past six weeks represents nothing so much as the
triumph of optimism over sanity. In late August, the U.N. Security
Council passed a resolution calling for peacekeepers to deploy to
Darfur to stop a genocide that has claimed some 400,000 lives over the
last three years. But the resolution contained a cruel catch: an
implicit promise that no peacekeepers would enter Darfur without the
approval of Sudan's leaders. This was optimistic logic, to say the
least, since it is widely known that Sudan's leaders are the very same
people who have orchestrated the Darfur genocide; and what genocidaire
would, given a choice, invite foreign troops to enter his country to
bring a halt to his evil work? As a result, it probably should not have
surprised anyone when Sudan offered a blunt response to the U.N.'s
entreaties: No. Yet the optimists were not done trying, and, six weeks
later, they are still at it--urging, begging, cajoling the thugs who
rule Sudan to please allow U.N. troops to enter Darfur. Still, the
thugs say no. Still, the pleading of the diplomats goes on. This is
optimism, of a sort. It is also--excuse our lack of diplomacy--utter
madness.
Meanwhile, in the real world, where Darfuris live, things continue to
get worse. Consider recent events in an area of southern Darfur called
Buram. There, in late August, Arab militiamen from the Habbania tribe
attacked 45 villages, killing several hundred civilians. The villages
were burned and looted and their residents forced to scatter.
"Reportedly, women and children were thrown into burning dwellings as
they attempted to flee," according to a recent U.N. report. "Children
as young as three years old, including the daughter of an interviewee,
were killed in this manner." But that, apparently, was not enough.
After the initial round of attacks, militia from another Arab
tribe--the Fallata--attacked those fleeing the carnage, causing "the
displaced population to scatter even further" and "hampering efforts to
deliver aid to those affected." As a result, one eyewitness told the
U.N., "Most of our people are hiding in the bushes." Concerning
Khartoum's role, the U.N. report left little doubt: "Government
knowledge, if not complicity, in the attacks is almost certain."
If this scene--African children being tossed into burning dwellings by
Arab militiamen almost certainly backed by the Sudanese government--has
a familiar ring, it should. Identical scenes have been unfolding across
Darfur for three years. And, for three years, every proposed solution
that has received a respectable airing in the international community
has involved obtaining the consent of the murderers themselves. No
wonder not one of these so-called solutions has worked. The question
now before the West, and Americans in particular, is simple: When will
we have had enough of this charade? Will we wait until 600,000 die?
800,000? One million? Is there a magic number at which our moral
outrage will suddenly trump our deference to Sudanese sovereignty?
Fortunately, elite American opinion may finally be reaching that point.
Several weeks ago, Anthony Lake, one of the architects of U.S. inaction
in the Balkans, co-authored an op-ed suggesting that nato would be
justified in using force against Sudan in order to get peacekeepers
into Darfur. And even The New York Times editorial page recently
contemplated the possibility that nato might need to push its way into
Sudan without permission from Khartoum.
Which is, of course, the only way this genocide is going to end. The
sole alternative to using military force against Sudan is to continue
our current approach--counting on the good will of Khartoum's
unrepentant killers--and we know how well that has worked thus far.
Still, after all these years of murders and rapes and lootings--and
after all the roadblocks to peace engineered by Khartoum's ruling
regime--some officials, inexplicably, continue to hold out hope that
Sudan's leaders will suddenly cooperate in their own undoing. The
absurdity of this mentality was never more apparent than in a recent
U.N. press release that described the Buram massacres. In response to
the deaths, the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights came up with a
bold proposal: Her office, she announced, "is urging the government of
Sudan to order an independent investigation into recent militia
attacks." She must be an optimist, too.
the Editors
Printer friendly Get FOUR FREE WEEKS
of The New Republic.
E-mail this article
Discuss this article
Robert Cohen wrote:
> CBS's influential news
> program, SIXTY MINUTES, does a Darfur expose piece.
>
> It will have an impact on U.S. public opinion, which is generally
> ignorant about Darfur.
>
> I would doubt if 75 percent know much of anything about it--perhaps 90
> percent is more accurate.
>
> An aspect of the real politik U.S. diplomatic relations with The Sudan
> is that Sudan supplies intelligence about Al Qaida which previously was
> based in The Sudan.
>
> The death figure used by SIXTY MINUTES is 300,000 with 2 million
> refugees.
>
> The documentary is quite effective, and my Wife actually
> asked me to change channels when the Janjiweed were described as
> murdering, raping, burning and throwing dead bodies into Darfur's
> villages' wells.
>
> If the street Arab people were aware of what is going-on in Darfur, I
> can't think they'd be so apathetic.
>
> If I were a propaganda honcho, you better believe the Arab people would
> know.
>
> They are not an unemotional people.
>
> I perceive the "West" would prefer not further
> peeing-off Arabs, and thus will probably not intervene militarily.
>
> Gas per gallon here in Georgia is as low as $1.96 retail per gallon
> regular unleaded.
>
>
>
>
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/10/20/60minutes/main2111909.shtml
>
>
> CBS) It hardly seems possible, but the genocide in Darfur is taking a
> turn for the worse. The government in Sudan has launched a new
> offensive, maybe trying to finish what it started three years ago. As
> correspondent Scott Pelley reports, more than 300,000 people are dead
> and more than two million are refugees in the Sahara.
>
> To understand what is happening in Darfur, 60 Minutes came upon on the
> story of a boy named Jacob. We know him only because his name is on
> schoolbooks found in the ashes of his home. Jacob's village was wiped
> out. Our team saw his books in a museum. We didn't know whether Jacob
> was alive or whether we could find him. But we decided to try. Our
> search turned into a remarkable journey into a place we were forbidden
> to travel looking for a boy swept up in the 21st century's first
> genocide.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The search for Jacob began at the United States Holocaust Memorial in
> Washington D.C. Dedicated to never letting genocide happen again, it
> now finds itself with fresh evidence in a new exhibit.
>
> John Prendergast brought the remains from Jacob's village to
> Washington and to the Museum of Tolerance in Los Angeles. In the
> Clinton White House, he led a team that imposed economic sanctions on
> Sudan. Now, he's with the private, International Crisis Group,
> pressing for action in Darfur.
>
> "We found in a book bag, a series of notebooks," Prendergast explains.
> "Clearly the kid who was doing math and spelling homework and the
> teacher has corrected it with a red pen."
>
> The kid, Jacob, must have been 16 when his village was destroyed. 60
> Minutes packed his books and left on a 7,000-mile journey.
>
> One reason the Sudanese government is getting away with murder is that
> the scene of the crime is about as far away as a place can be. 60
> Minutes hired a bush plane to drop the team in Chad along the Sudan
> border. There was no runway, just rocks marking a strip in the Sahara.
> There are no roads either. We crossed with Jacob's books during the
> rainy season when all the rain of the year falls in just a few weeks.
> But this wasn't the hard part.
>
> Our problem was, Jacob's story starts in a place we were forbidden to
> go. Darfur is occupied by government troops. Jacob's town, Hangala,
> is 50 miles inside. The U.S. State Department warned 60 Minutes not to
> try to go there.
>
> If our team could get to Hangala, rebels who call themselves the
> National Redemption Front could help. It's their families who are
> being massacred. They agreed to give us cover to Hangala.
>
> And so 60 Minutes crossed the border. We asked the Sudanese government
> for permission to come into Darfur but we didn't get it, no surprise.
> The Sudanese have been trying to keep reporters and other observers out
> of this area. They've intensified that effort lately. In just the
> last few weeks two journalists have been captured making this run.
>
> You can look at it this way: back in 1944, the Germans didn't want
> anybody coming in and seeing their death camps. Today in Sudan, the
> government doesn't want anybody coming in and seeing what amount to
> death villages.
>
> It's a five hour trip, but in the rainy season the gun trucks sank to
> their axels. We dug them out, and did it again every hour or so. In
> time, we picked up speed. It was a good thing. Five hours turned to 12.
> By the time we reached Hangala, there were 45 minutes of daylight left.
> The rebels put scouts on the high ground and surrounded the village.
>
> Before the attack, Hangala was a typical village, with a population of
> roughly 500; afterwards, the entire village was burned down.
>
> Asked why the entire village was destroyed, Prendergast says it's a
> message. "It's a message to non-Arab people in Darfur. 'We do not
> want you in Darfur.'"
>
> It's a message delivered by Sudanese troops and a racist Arab militia
> called the Janjaweed.
>
>
> Continued
>
> 1 | 2 | 3
>
>
>
>
>
> Produced By Shawn Efran
> ©MMVI, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.
>
>
> Now you're in the public comment zone. What follows is not CBS News
> stuff; it comes from other people and we don't vouch for it. A
> reminder: By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of
> Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
>
>
>
>
> Robert Cohen wrote:
>> I predict the "Associated Press" will be also be expelled from Sudan:
>>
>>
>>
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/world/AP-Sudan-UN-Darfur.html?hp&ex=1161576000&en...
>>
>>
>> Sudan Gives U.N. Envoy 3 Days to Leave
>> E-MailPrint Save
>>
>> By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
>> Published: October 22, 2006
>> Filed at 3:08 p.m. ET
>>
>> Skip to next paragraph
>> Related
>> Sudanese Army Says U.N. Envoy Is Declared Persona Non Grata (October
>> 21, 2006)KHARTOUM, Sudan (AP) -- The Sudanese government Sunday ordered
>> the chief U.N. envoy out of the country after he wrote that Sudan's
>> army had suffered major losses in recent fighting in Darfur.
>>
>> Jan Pronk was given 72 hours to leave -- an order that is likely to
>> complicate international efforts to halt the killings, rapes and other
>> atrocities in the strife-torn region of western Sudan.
>>
>> ''The presence of the United Nations is vital to hundreds of thousands
>> of citizens of the Darfur region,'' said a European Union spokesman,
>> Amadeu Altafaj Tardio, in Brussels.
>>
>> In a statement distributed by the official Sudan News Agency, the
>> country's Foreign Ministry accused Pronk of demonstrating ''enmity to
>> the Sudanese government and the armed forces'' and of involvement in
>> unspecified activities ''that are incompatible with his mission.''
>>
>> In New York, U.N. spokesman Stephane Dujarric said Secretary-General
>> Kofi Annan had received a letter from the Sudanese government asking
>> that Pronk be removed from the post.
>>
>> ''The secretary-general is studying the letter and has in the meantime
>> requested that Mr. Pronk come to New York for consultations,'' Dujarric
>> said.
>>
>> Pronk, a blunt-speaking former Dutch Cabinet minister, drew sharp
>> criticism from the Sudanese armed forces after he wrote this month in
>> his blog,
www.janpronk.nl, that Sudan's military had suffered heavy
>> losses in recent fighting with rebels in northern Darfur.
>>
>> ''Reports speak about hundreds of casualties in each of the two
>> battles, many wounded soldiers and many taken as prisoner,'' he said.
>>
>> The Sudanese armed forces said Thursday that those remarks amounted to
>> ''psychological war against the Sudanese army'' and declared that Pronk
>> was ''persona non-grata.''
>>
>> One day later the military demanded an official apology.
>>
>> Even before the blog appeared, Sudan's government had been at odds with
>> Pronk over Western efforts to get Sudan to allow a U.N. force of 20,000
>> troops to take over peacekeeping in Darfur from a 7,000-member African
>> Union force.
>>
>> Violence has risen dramatically in recent weeks in Darfur, where more
>> than 200,000 people have been killed and 2.5 million displaced in three
>> years of fighting.
>>
>> U.N. officials have said the African Union force is too small and
>> ill-equipped to cope with the violence and protest civilians from rape,
>> murder and pillage.
>>
>> But President Omar al-Bashir has rejected a U.N. peacekeeping force,
>> branding it as simply a bid to restore colonial rule.
>>
>> Despite the move against Pronk, the official news agency said Khartoum
>> was ''committed to cooperate'' with the U.N. and would work with a new
>> envoy ''in accordance with signed treaties with the U.N. and the
>> current principles of international law.''
>>
>> In Geneva, Switzerland, U.N. spokeswoman Marie Heuze noted that Pronk's
>> comments were on his private blog and reflect ''only his personal
>> views.''
>>
>> Britain condemned the decision and urged the Sudanese to reconsider.
>>
>> ''This step is counterproductive and will contribute nothing to solving
>> the problems of Sudan,'' Lord Triesman, the Foreign Office minister for
>> African issues, said in a statement.
>>
>> Last June, the Sudanese suspended the work of all U.N. missions in the
>> Darfur except UNICEF and the World Food Program after claiming the U.N.
>> had transported a rebel leader in violation of agreements.
>>
>> The next day, the government reversed the decision following a meeting
>> between a representative of the Sudanese Foreign Ministry and the
>> United Nations.
>>
>> Darfur, a largely arid plateau in western Sudan about three-quarters
>> the size of Texas, has been in turmoil since February 2003, when ethnic
>> African tribes rebelled after years of neglect by the Arab-dominated
>> government in Khartoum.
>>
>> The government responded with a military campaign in which
>> pro-government Arab militia, the Janjaweed, are alleged to have
>> committed widespread atrocities. Khartoum denies supporting the
>> Janjaweed.
>>
>> A peace deal this year was signed by the Sudanese government and the
>> main rebel group, the Sudanese Liberation Movement.
>>
>> But a breakaway faction and another rebel group rejected the deal and
>> fighting has escalated, causing increasing numbers of aid workers to
>> withdraw, leaving the refugees without food and medicine.
>>
>> U.S. Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., said Sunday that the United States
>> should do more to help stem violence in Darfur.
>>
>> ''When you have situations involving genocide, it is important for us
>> as a world community -- and the United States is the world's sole super
>> power -- for us to take that seriously, and to make commitments of
>> resources to deal with it,'' Obama told NBC's ''Meet the Press.''
>>
>> Pronk, 66, served several terms in the Dutch parliament and served in
>> the Dutch Cabinet under two prime ministers. He was appointed as U.N.
>> special representative for Sudan in June 2004.
>>
>> More Articles in International »Need to know more? 50%% off home
>> delivery of The Times.More Articles in International »
>>
>>
>>
>>
nytimes.com/movies
>>
>>
>>
>> Sofia Coppola's "Marie Antoinette" is "highly theatrical and yet also
>> intimate and informal"
>>
>>
>> Also in Movies:
>> 'Shortbus' - "as utopian visions go, it doesn't got much better"
>> 'Infamous' - "quick-witted, stylish and well-acted"
>> 'Man Push Cart' - "an exemplary work of independent filmmaking"
>>
>>
>>
>> Inside
NYTimes.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Robert Cohen wrote:
>>> An illustration or example of how the alleged genocide is
>>> reported/unreported:
>>>
>>>
http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=w061016&s=braude101806
>>>
>>> Why are Darfuris being expelled from Dubai?
>>> Native Speaker
>>> by Joseph Braude
>>> Only at TNR Online | Post date 10.20.06 Discuss this article (10)
>>> Printer friendly
>>> E-mail this article
>>>
>>>
>>> Dubai, United Arab Emirates
>>>
>>> Darfuri native Hasan Najila is hardly a household name among Arab TV
>>> viewers, but his condemnation of the genocide being perpetrated by the
>>> Sudanese government appears to have made waves. A furniture exporter
>>> and ten-year resident of the United Arab Emirates, his career as a
>>> public dissident began two years ago as a frequent contributor to the
>>> major networks' call-in talk shows--notably the daily audience forum
>>> "Minbar Al Jazeera." Within a few months, the Iranian-owned
>>> Arabic-language network Alalam took notice and invited him to appear on
>>> a live program. Other stations, including Al Jazeera and Al Arabiya,
>>> followed suit, and, soon, hardly a week would go by without Najila's
>>> voice or face popping up on one channel or another. "His Arabic is
>>> superb and he makes a compelling case to Arabs and Muslims," says Abu
>>> Bakr Al Gadi, an Arab native of Khartoum who lives in Qatar. "Any
>>> fair-minded person would be persuaded to oppose the Sudanese government
>>> after hearing him out."
>>>
>>> Network executives and sympathetic listeners weren't the only ones
>>> taking notice of Najila, however. Last February, Khartoum's ambassador
>>> to the UAE phoned Najila at home and warned him to end his media
>>> appearances--a warning he chose to ignore. "I felt safe to speak out
>>> because I lived in Dubai," he explains. A month later, however, Dubai
>>> customs agents conducted an intrusive search of Najila's personal
>>> effects upon his return from a trip to nearby Kuwait. Then, in April,
>>> Dubai's security services interrogated him about possible contributions
>>> to Darfuri rebel groups, his professional dealings, and his personal
>>> life. "They questioned me six hours per day for five days straight," he
>>> recalls. Never charged with any crime, Najila was nonetheless released
>>> with clear instructions: pack up and leave the city-state for good.
>>> "They ordered me to get out within two weeks and not come back," Najila
>>> says. When he moved on to Qatar, he left behind his business, his stock
>>> holdings, everything.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Najila isn't the only prominent Darfuri expat to be kicked out of the
>>> UAE recently. At least six others have had their residency status
>>> revoked in the last two years. All had been known within the Sudanese
>>> community as Darfuri opposition figures. And, though it's difficult to
>>> prove outright, the strong implication is that the expulsions came at
>>> the behest of Khartoum.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> t's understandable that the government in Khartoum would be concerned
>>> about Darfuri expats' activities in the Gulf states. They're among the
>>> wealthiest per capita Darfuri diaspora communities in the world, and
>>> they are fairly well-integrated into Arabic-speaking Gulf society--well
>>> placed, in other words, both to drum up support for Muslim victims of
>>> the Janjaweed and perhaps to contribute financially to Darfuri refugees
>>> or rebels. Many of the 7,000 who now live in the UAE, for example,
>>> arrived 20 years ago or more to stock the nascent UAE army. As the
>>> armed forces gradually recruited more locals to join their ranks,
>>> Darfuris moved into the private sector--leveraging family and personal
>>> ties to Sudan and Chad as a gateway to trading networks in central
>>> Africa. Moreover, since Dubai now hosts either headquarters or studio
>>> offices for most major Arab satellite networks, the potential is
>>> immense for well-spoken, well-connected Darfuris like Najila to work
>>> the Arab TV talk-show circuit, reaching tens of millions of
>>> impressionable viewers and possibly convincing them that Arab
>>> solidarity with Khartoum is woefully misguided.
>>>
>>> Najila, who had run a trading company that moved home furnishings
>>> through Dubai into central Africa, has much in common with six other
>>> Darfuris who lost their residency over the last two years. Ibrahim
>>> Ahmad Ibrahim had been a well-known shipping merchant in Dubai since
>>> 1995. Jibril Ibrahim Muhammad, an economics PhD and import-export
>>> merchant, is the older brother of Khalil Ibrahim Muhammad, who leads
>>> one of the two main Darfuri opposition groups. Hasan Adam Wadi had been
>>> a lawyer in Abu Dhabi with wealthy local clients. Abd Al Jabbar Ab Bakr
>>> Bashir had been a partner in a successful Dubai tourism company.
>>> Mustafa Tayrab, another merchant, was an outspoken supporter of
>>> Darfur's "Tahrir" rebel movement. All had been known within the
>>> Sudanese community as Darfuri opposition figures. "By kicking us out,"
>>> explains the seventh evictee, businessman and Darfuri Justice and
>>> Equality Movement supporter B'shara Sleyman, "the government here has
>>> intimidated all Darfuris from raising their heads too high."
>>>
>>> But why would the UAE bow to pressure from Khartoum to kick out legal
>>> residents? The consensus among Darfuris I've spoken with is that the
>>> UAE cooperates with Khartoum's security apparatus as much due to
>>> personal loyalties as Arab politics. Sudanese President Omar Al Bashir,
>>> who lived and worked in Abu Dhabi as a military advisor in the 1980s,
>>> is commonly credited as one of the architects of the UAE's armed
>>> forces. From his presidential palace in Khartoum, he is believed to
>>> maintain close relations with the Emirates security apparatus he left
>>> behind. Cozy relationships like these elsewhere in the Middle East have
>>> long been known to blur the legal borders of sovereignty between benign
>>> Arab governments and their more brutal neighbors. Witness Jordan in the
>>> early '80s, where Iraqi opposition activists faced the daily fear of
>>> being shipped off to Baghdad for interrogation by Saddam's intelligence
>>> services--thanks to a gentleman's agreement between the latter
>>> president and the late King Hussein. Or behold Lebanon under Syrian
>>> military rule--where voices hostile to Damascus easily faced
>>> retribution in Lebanon, by order of Damascus.
>>>
>>> But, while Arab leaders have consistently backed the Sudanese regime in
>>> the United Nations and the Arab League, not every Gulf security
>>> apparatus seems to be as reflexively cooperative with Khartoum as that
>>> of the UAE. In Qatar, I was impressed to read acerbic criticism of
>>> Khartoum and strident support for Darfur's Justice and Equality rebel
>>> movement in the local newspaper, Al Watan. The author of the essay,
>>> Sudanese opposition activist Abu Bakr Al Gadi, regularly brings
>>> together Darfuri, Beja, and Arab Sudanese elites to his home in Doha
>>> for political discussions. One such meeting I attended culminated in
>>> commitments by several guests to advance the Darfur issue through media
>>> outreach. Gadi himself attempts to lobby Qatari nationals in government
>>> to think critically about their Sudan policy. (I watched him make the
>>> case one afternoon to a senior official in the country's justice
>>> ministry.) He, too, has received a telephone threat from the local
>>> Sudanese ambassador. But that was over a year ago, and no Qatari
>>> security officials have come knocking on his door.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> o be sure, the UAE has made charitable contributions to the people of
>>> Darfur, among many other needy peoples. To the government's credit,
>>> airlifts of food and medicine were dispatched to central Sudan last
>>> year by the emirs of Dubai and neighboring Sharjah.
>>>
>>> But the UAE has also cultivated an image as a country committed to
>>> international norms of civil society and the rule of law, a cut or two
>>> above the Arab police states to its west. Evicting Darfuri residents
>>> and intimidating the Darfuri community into silence threatens that
>>> image. Not only should UAE officials restore Hasan Najila's good
>>> standing as a resident of Dubai, along with that of the other evictees
>>> if they wish to return; they should serve notice that all Darfuris
>>> within their borders have the same right to make their case to Arab
>>> publics that Palestinian and other guest workers do. Such are the
>>> standards of fairness to which all globalizing countries should
>>> aspire--without prejudice against a beleaguered people suffering under
>>> the knife of Islamist terrorism.
>>>
>>> Joseph Braude is the author of The New Iraq: Rebuilding the Country for
>>> Its People, the Middle East, and the World.
>>>
>>> Printer friendly Get FOUR FREE WEEKS
>>> of The New Republic.
>>> E-mail this article
>>> Discuss this article
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> RELATED LINKS Waiting Game
>>> Can a U.N. resolution stop the genocide in Darfur? web only Out of Time
>>> The United Nations and Darfur