On Dec 12, 10:26 pm, guardian Snow
eck.net.au> wrote:>> On Dec 12, 10:00 pm, Chris Johnson
gmail.com> wrote:>
>
>>>> On Dec 12, 9:24 pm, Chris Johnson
gmail.com> wrote:>
>
>>>>>> What a bunch of infantile low-lifes on this forum.
>
>>>>> It's called a newsgroup, for reference. Five newsgroups, actually. In
>>>>> any event, I don't think alt.atheism is the best place to discuss your
>>>>> inter-cult disputes.
>
>>>>>> Jews, Christians,
>>>>>> Atheists all will not even let me exercise my rights of free speech.
>
>>>>> Bullshit. Nobody's stopping you from exercising free speech. And
>>>>> neither is anybody stopping us from exercising ours by mocking your
>>>>> superstitions. That's how free speech works.
>
>>>>>> All of you are truly evil and will truly get what you deserve.
>
>>>>> As I understand it, most Western countries don't consider threats free
>>>>> speech. May want to watch it, bud.
>
>>>> Oh, poor crybaby. Big bullshit artist
>
>>> Flattery gets you nowhere.
>
>>>> claims that the doctrine of
>>>> karma is a "threat."
>
>>> Doctrine of karma? I admit I didn't read your original post very far,
>>> but I thought you were a whacked out Jew. Huh.
>
>>> Anyway, "All of you are truly evil and will truly get what you
>>> deserve." reads like the standard Christer hell threat, but can easily
>>> be interpreted as an actual threat. There certainly are the nutjobs on
>>> Usenet that might try to track down people in real life.
>
>>>> If you're too dumb to figure it out, what I was
>>>> complaining about was the changing of the title
>
>>> Really? It looked like you were whining about Uncle Vic's comment that
>>> you're full of shit, as that's what the headers of the post to which I
>>> responded indicate.
>
>>>> by two infantile
>>>> "Christians" named Guardian Snowjob and Linda Lovelace. That prevents
>>>> people from knowing the subject matter of this discussion.
>
>>> They're not changing the headers on your posts, so I don't see how.
>>> And they're not even really participating in your discussion (You seem
>>> to be the only one.); they're just making fun of you.
>
>> Well you have your bigoted perceptions. Why don't you keep them to
>> yourself. You suck.
>
> Tell you what. Let's have peace my friend and stop the silly games..
> I have no issue with you. I don't mind trying to have civil discussion
> with people I disagree with.. everybody disagrees with me so your in
> good company... I'll not change your titles if you can keep yourself
> from doing the same, it's called respect.
>
> Shalom my friend,
>
> Snow
>
> We must respect the other fellow's religion, but only in the sense and
> to the extent that we respect his theory that his wife is beautiful
> and his children smart.
> H. L. Mencken
Agreed re: titles, but I changed Linda's title only once, for a
slightly clever reason. You kept changing mine again and again
somewhat maliciously.
Like I said, I posted my conjecture in all earnestness. Why don't you
read it and give me your serious critique.
