...Out of principle if nothing else.

This guy is the worst danger and threat to free expression on the internet
we have. Forget issues and see that danger for what it is. Side with
keeping this medium free. Or else, it may be your point of view that will
be attacked from a ad hominen social provocation to chase you away. All
views are needed and we should recognize true and honest discourse from
'social crusading'. Phil Odox is a crusader, as mindless as the middle age
warrior who fights for God and King with no question...to smite down the
pagan worshiper [by his decrea of what that pagan worshiper IS]. He is
dangerous because he uses the extensive archives of this medium to build
glass structures out of context to substantiate HIS agenda.

Why is no one else upset over this guy?

What is his author or persona name?

On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 17:54:35 -0700, Sir Frederick fuzzysys.com> wrote:

Never mind I found him. Insanity is all around,
or maybe its just me.

On Jun 21, 8:17 pm, "tooly" bellsouth.net> wrote:

On Jun 21, 9:35 pm, Sir Frederick fuzzysys.com> wrote:

it's not just you.
insanity is all around.

re: enduring character of phil odox

I can't endorse this, because that's my realativistic banal reality
believe Ripley's or not

It is one thing to have sex, and another thing to be non-plussed
afterwards--the puss after the pussey may appear after a day plus

This duplicitous, judgmental, super insignificant n.g. is apparently
imho brainwashed about the subjectivity of absolutist determinism


I ain't, and that's been true since 1954 when I almost learned that
the amphibians are after the reptiles (or perhaps that's vice-versa)

While the "ufo" could be other dimensional that's fallacious>

www.wikipeedia.org/tadpoles.don't.hardly.taste.like.sushi.nor.chicken

On Jun 21, 9:54 pm, kevirwin comcast.net> wrote:

On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 20:17:37 -0400, "tooly" bellsouth.net> wrote:

Out of YOUR principle and nothing else, you mean. Are you
so lame and ill-equipped that you have to try marshaling the
whole group behind you in your efforts to stop me from getting
the borg to explain his racism and general hatred for humankind?
No one, not even someone who hides behind a children's fictional
TV character like the borg has the freedom to promote hatred and
issue threats to all on a daily basis as he does without criticism. If
the borg is free to continue promoting his hatred and threatening
those who criticise him with "punishment", then it's fair and just
that others like myself can continue to criticise his position and
ask him to explain it fully.

On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 21:25:45 -0700 (PDT), Robert Cohen msn.com> wrote:

On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 20:17:37 -0400, tooly wrote:

Have no idea who he is or what he is saying. I am not getting his posts.

Oh my