On Sep 17, 2:07Â am, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
>
Dear Henri: Light always leaves the source at: ['c' plus or minus
v]. But when both the source and the destination are moving at the
identical velocity component, the velocity of the apparatus cancels
out. But that DOESN'T mean that the light isn't speeding up and
slowing down all over the place! I recommend that you write just one
algebraic equation as is explained in the following link, to learn the
above fact for yourself:
Replicating NoEinstein’s Invalidation of M-M
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/t/ac6fcd9b4e8112ed?hl=en
— NoEinstein —
>
> On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 18:20:19 -0700 (PDT), NoEinstein
bellsouth.net>
> wrote:
>>>On Sep 11, 3:31Â am, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:22:52 -0700 (PDT), NoEinstein
bellsouth.net>
>>> wrote:>
>>>>Dear Henri: Â How can you call the M-M experiment trivial? Â Even though
>>>>it had nil results, many consider such experiment to be one of, if not
>>>>the, most important experiment in the history of science. Â
>
>>> The experment was only important because everyone at the time believed in an
>>> absolute aether.
>>> Without the aether, which of course doesn't exist, the MMX is so trivial that
>>> Michelson and Morley should have their names removed from physics history.....
>>> along with everyone who takes the experiment seriously.
>
>>> Light is ballistic. That is why there was a null result.
>
>>>>Without
>>>>Lorentz's ridiculous "rubber rulers" explanation for the nil results
>>>>of M-M, Einstein wouldn't have been able to screw up science for over
>>>>a century. Â If anyone, before yours truly, had realized that M-M
>>>>lacked a CONTROL, there would be no Lorentz transformations, and no
>>>>space-time junk. Â The only person dumber than Einstein was Lorentz!
>>>>That man was largely clueless—especially about the varying moduli of
>>>>elasticity of all materials. Â Lorentz figured that velocity, and
>>>>velocity alone, can compress all objects an identical amount (ha!).
>>>>Where are "the engineers" in science when you need them?  — NoEinstein
>>>>—
>
>>Dear Henri: Â The reason there was a nil (not null) result is because
>>both light courses had one reflection from the 45 degree beam
>>splitter. Â The latter automatically corrects for the speed up or slow
>>down of the light photons hitting the mirror. Â Please read the
>>following link.  — NoEinstein —
>
>
> There is no aether.
>
> In the MMX, light leaves its source at c and remains at c wrt every component
> of the apparatus since everything is M.A.R. (except when inside the glass
> compensating plate, if present).
>
> There was never going to be a significant fringe shift no matter how the
> apparatus was rotated...(unless there is a large acceleration in one direction.
> If the experiment is carried out away from the equator a very small shift could
> occur due to acceleration differences...but I haven't done the sums).
>
> Like I said, the experiment was a total waste of time and money, as has been
> all the subsequent discussion.
>
> The explanation is trivial.
>
> Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
>
> There is no food shortage, just an excess of people. Send abortion pills not food aid.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
