> On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 12:52:45 -0700 (PDT), NoEinstein bellsouth.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>

>>On Sep 8, 8:28 pm, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:

>>> On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 13:31:57 -0700 (PDT), NoEinstein bellsouth.net>
>>> wrote:

>

>>>>On Sep 2, 2:32 am, Sanny hotmail.com> wrote:

>>>>> Partical Accelerators use electro magnetic waves to accelerate
>>>>> particals using their charge.

>

>>>>> Since electro magnetic waves travel at speed "c" the max speed they
>>>>> can force a charged partical is c.

>

>>>>> Say there is a pipe of water and a ball in inside. And water is
>>>>> travelling at 2 m/ s speed. How fast the ball can be moved.

>

>>>>> 1. initially ball is at rest.

>

>>>>> 2. slowly its speed is 1.999 m / s.

>

>>>>> 3. We keep increasing the flow of water at speed 2 m / s Then speed of
>>>>> Ball reaches 1.999999 m /.s

>

>>>>> But never the Ball will attacin 2 m / s Why?

>

>>>>> Because 2 m/ s is the speed of water and due to viscosity and other
>>>>> factors Ball can never travel faster than 2 m / s.

>

>>>>> So you now understand why Partical Accelerators which uses electro
>>>>> magnetic waves can never have a partical travel at speed c.

>

>>>>> Bye
>>>>> Sanny

>

>>>>> Be Intelligent:http://www.GetClub.com

>

>>>>Dear Sanny:  Even inside vacuums, ether lurks.  Because ether units,
>>>>which I call IOTAs, are polar, such will clump together in front of
>>>>"speeding" charged particles.  The faster the particles are pushed,
>>>>the bigger is the clump of ether which resists.  That effect has
>>>>nothing to do with Einstein's theories!  It is due to the
>>>>misinterpretation of the nil results of the M-M experiment. "Yes
>>>>Virginia..." there is an ETHER!  — NoEinstein —

>

>>> there's NO aether....but there's the 'stuff that fields are made of'.

>

>>> When a charge is accelerated by a voltage between two electrodes, it builds up
>>> a reverse field that tends to neutralize the applied one.  Because the field
>>> travels at c and the particle is approaching that speed wrt chamber, a reverse
>>> field 'bubble' builds up around the moving charge. A lot of energy is tied up
>>> in that field, giving the impression of a mass increase and explaining why
>>> bolometer experiments seem to verify same.
>>> I haven't done the math but I assume it ends up with gamma appearing
>>> somewhere.

>

>>> Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

>

>>> All religion involves selling a nonexistant concept to gullible fools. Einstein cleverly exploited this principle with his second postulate.- Hide quoted text -

>

>>> - Show quoted text -

>

>>Dear Henri: Your devotion to your own ideas is admirable, but such
>>doesn't jive with all of the observations in nature, nor take into
>>account my very simple finding: M-M doesn't have a CONTROL.  

>
> MMX doesn't need a control. It's explanation is trivial. Light is ballistic.
>

>>Because
>>of the latter finding, Lorentz's "rubber rulers" are out; ether is in;
>>light velocity isn't the same for all observers; and the velocity of
>>light (and space travel) isn't limited by Einstein's theories, nor by
>>'c'.  You and I agree on some things.  But anything "Einstein" is
>>OUT!  — NoEinstein —

>
> Einstein was a complete hoaxer..but he actually fluked a couple of correct
> equations..... like the gravitational blueshift. It is the same as the BaTh
> one, which is based on light accelerating as it falls.
> Einstein merely made light speed constant by putting a magical gradient in
> space to make that so...and not surprisingly came up with the right answer.
>
> Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
>
> All religion involves selling a nonexistant concept to gullible fools. Einstein cleverly exploited this principle with his second postulate.