Re: Why accelerators cannot push electrons travel at speed more than "c
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Why accelerators cannot push electrons travel at speed more than "c         

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: Spaceman
Date: Sep 8, 2008 22:34

Shrikeback@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sep 8, 9:23 pm, "Spaceman"
> wrote:
>> Shrikeb...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Sep 8, 8:47 pm, "Spaceman"
>>> wrote:
>>>> Shrikeb...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> Actually, if you'd have read the Special Theory of
>>>>> relativity, or, for that matter, the history of science,
>>>>> you'd know that c actually is a special speed that
>>>>> is invariant in all frames of reference.
>>
>>>> Oh and BTW:
>>>> If you had even the slightest clue about science and
>>>> what "at rest" frames are, and the history of science you would
>>>> understand what I am saying 100%%... but I see
>>>> you have not ever learned about the history of science
>>>> and you must have skipped classical physics and
>>>> you probably even think the shortest distance between
>>>> two points is a curved line.
>>
>>> Welcome to the twentieth century, where sometimes
>>> the shortest path between two points really is curved.
>>
>> You poor thing,
>> I feel sorry for you.
>> You will never learn how to make tunnels now.
>
> For the most part they approximate one another.
>
>>> How are you going to make it to the twenty-first
>>> century, stuck as you are in an absolute frame of
>>> reference?
>>
>> I am not stuck
>> and there is no "absolute" frame of reference.
>
> Then how is it you figure there is some absolute velocity?

I don't.
Why the hell do you think I do?
I never said such.
I said all speed are relative.
and all "at rest" frames wrt each other can read the same
speeds as constant all the time.
>> Again, I see you have no classical physics in your head
>> at all where "at rest frames" do not mean "absolute frames
>> at all.
>
> If there are no absolute frames, then all frames are
> relative.

All frames are relative, correct.
Now read this part carefully
All relative "at rest" frames will measure the speed of light
to be c, but all relative non rest frames will not.
>> Stuck in your "warped" world and you have no clue
>> what is straight, nor physically the shortest distance
>> anymore.
>
> The shortest distance depends on what the
> metric is.

No,
The metric is a trick played on you to think all warped
and never learn about the reality of 3D that we live in.
The physical dimensions that are 3D Euclidian to perfection.
Proof again you skipped classical physics and jumped
right to the warped rubber ruler crap.
No wonder you don't understand what I am saying.

--
James M Driscoll Jr
Creator of the Clock Malfunction Theory
Spaceman
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!