> On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 23:10:18 -0700 (PDT), "Y.Porat" gmail.com> wrote:

>>On Sep 6, 1:43 am, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:

>>> On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 20:11:13 -0700 (PDT), "Y.Porat" gmail.com> wrote:

>>>>On Sep 5, 1:45 am, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:

>>>>> there is no 'gamma....except in aether theories
>>>>> ------------------

>>>>who told you that??

>

>>>>the gamma factor was the 'reason' for
>>>>the claim that no mass can reach c !!

>

>>>>wile v=c it becomes infinit !!
>>>>------------

>

>>>>>> any tome when ever you are pushed to   the corner
>>>>>>you will say      crap ??
>>>>>>that what will   make you  a productive scientist

>

>>>>>>a  REAL   scientist must have some intellectual integrity as well
>>>>>>or maybe a fucken   bump parasite ??

>

>>>>> Newton's correct equation is: a = F/m

>

>>>>and why not
>>>>F=ma ?? as well
>>>>just because you say so ??!!

>

>>> because 'a' is the dependent variable.
>>> -----------------------

>>so what??

>

>>v velocity    is also    a dependable variable so
>>it cannot be defined   as a physical entity ?? ??
>>anyway
>>any definition in our culture is done by using
>>other 'known' or acceptable to be known --terms

>

>>you cannot define anything   by ITSELF   !!!
>>we were dealing with mass
>>and the question is not
>>if we define it by otherterms or not
>>the question is whether we define it  CORRECT!!!
>>---------------
>>so waht i did
>>i took a formula that even you acccept
>>and interpretated it differently physically
>>you know why ??
>>because you as well INTERPRETED  IT
>>ARBITRARY    BY   YOUR INTERPREATTION
>>ans your interpretation is no better
>>than mine
>>actaualy mine i s   less arbitrary
>>but that is not for you or me to decide
>>it is for other peole to decide which   is more reasobable
>>and more compatible with  a  former accepted base
>>----

>

>>so again   F is not

>

>>F=Gamma  m a
>>but
>>F/Gamma = m a
>>and m remains constant

>

>>AS IT IS IN MACROCOSM
>>IT IS IN CHEMISTRY
>> etc etc
>>there was no reason at all even to start thinking
>>otherwise
>>now Dr genius
>>if you really want to unserstand how that harmful mistake started;

>

>>it started with a soopid extrapolation  people
>>of the idea that
>>NO MASS CAN REACH c   since
>>we know experimentally that
>>it becomes more and more difficult to add acceleration
>>to mass

>
> In an accelerator, yes. That's because of the 'Wilson reverse field bubble'.
> Cosmic rays move at >>c wrt earth. So do the muons they produce.
>
>
>
>
>

>>but no one considered thjat
>>(THE PHOTON ANS PHOTON MASS IS A LIMIT CASE
>>EVENAMTHEMATICALLY
>> and you cannot extrapolate endlessly  !!!!
>>THATS ALL!!

>

>>the experimental fact  DOES NOT TELL US** WHY**
>> IT IS MORE DIFFICULT
>>TO ADD ACCELERATION TO MASS
>>IT IS SOME   PEOPLE  *** INTERPRETATION***
>>FOR THAT FACT !!
>>and a wrong interpretation because   they ddint notice
>>that right under their nose there is a much   less problematic
>>interpretation
>>got it??
>>it is an   interpretation of a fact not a fact
>>and a great genius like PHD Wilson
>>should be able to make a difference between
>>experimental facts     and    **interpretations of facts !!!**

>

>>so
>>the form :

>

>>F'gamma = m  a
>>is less problematic(less contradictory to basics ) than the common
>>one

>
> Take Ohm's law.
> The correct version is I = V/R.
> Yet we also know by experiment that if a currect of I is flowing through a
> resistance, there will exist a voltage drop of V = RI across that resistance.
>
> y point, Porat, is that such twistiing of equations cannot bte used as
> definitions.
>
> A force cannot be defined by the math relationship: mass x acceleration.
> A force exists in its own right whether acceleration results or not.
>

>>-------------
>>ps
>>now     from now on please  be careful using the word 'crap'
>>if you consider yourself a responsible   scientist  !!
>>2
>>i am not a PHD      (:-)
>>i am something else ....just a  humble    Bsc
>>but a Bsc that did some more work beyond the Bsc
>>see my link
>>as published here before ........
>>that might  be even a little more than a Phd  .....
>>ATB

>
> I think you would be better off getting a Ba in English spelling and grammer so
> we might be able to understand what you are trying to say.
>

>>Y.Porat

>

>>>>and why not
>>>>m=f/a   as well??

>

>>>>just ebcause you dismiss it ??

>
> Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
>
> All religion involves selling a nonexistant concept to gullible fools. Einstein cleverly exploited this principle with his second postulate.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -