Re: why a lot of liberal jews(like adam sandler and natalie portman)suck. they use and abuse us.
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: why a lot of liberal jews(like adam sandler and natalie portman)suck. they use and abuse us.         

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: Bret Cahill
Date: Jun 14, 2008 09:26

> My impressions of the poster-ranter ain't at all pretty, so I hesitate
> posting 'em,

Someone needs to say something.
> but what the hay--what's a n.g. for ?
> High I.Q.person

An unaccomplished person entirely incapable of any independent
thought.

Such a nobody it would be easy to ignore the post altogether.
> articulates mad beefs & ugly bitchings.
> Not able in anonymity to �acknowledge personal fraility, envy,
> weakness, self-interest, imperfections, sin--the usual stuff for the
> slinging of mud at enemies.
> Female probably,

I can only determine a writer's gender in _New Yorker_ articles.

I sometimes get corrected referring to a poster as "she."

Of course, that correction might be a lie as well.
> though not a certainty, though certainly coldly
> vicious.

"Good natured and vicious" a ridiculous combination except when it
comes to the [protonazis].

-- Nietzsche
> Projecting or displacing �racist self quite "liberally" onto others.

A complete hypocrite.
> Skillful at extrapolating & playing with problems & the beaucoup
> absurdities of others.

Skillful with ignorant non thinkers.

The rightwing will always use one bad apple to justify genocide.
> A bottom-line ethnocentric--while isn't everybody at least somewhat?

The hypocrisy is jaw dropping.
> Has a few unfortunate Jews as acquaintances with non-joyous
> experiences.

Like I've been saying, I'd hate for Jews, if they ever got into power,
to confuse me with Hitler or even Cheney.
> By bashing them sub-humans, the poster's self-righteous ravings
> nevertheless indicate fascination if not obssession & fixation: Has
> thought about the target for a long time.
> So smartly decontructs Jews while implicitly revealing herself
> simultaneously.
> Projects political ambivalences upon Jews.
> Overall it's a provocative piece of stinking stream of conscious
> dislike.
> Deserves Harvard Razzy anti-humanitarian �award.

That's exactly why they are always such hypocrites.
> This is an explicit overly ad hominem counter-attack, because the
> posting is in the vein of liberally offending me.

Left wing anti-semitism is offensive.

Right wing anti-semitism is dangerous.

Bret Cahill
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!