Re: why a lot of liberal jews(like adam sandler and natalie portman)suck. they use and abuse us.
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.philosophy Profile…
 Up
Re: why a lot of liberal jews(like adam sandler and natalie portman)suck. they use and abuse us.         


Author: Robert Cohen
Date: Jun 13, 2008 22:53

My impressions of the poster-ranter ain't at all pretty, so I hesitate
posting 'em, but what the hay--what's a n.g. for ?

High I.Q.person articulates mad beefs & ugly bitchings.
Not able in anonymity to acknowledge personal fraility, envy,
weakness, self-interest, imperfections, sin--the usual stuff for the
slinging of mud...
Show full article (1.24Kb)
5 Comments
Re: why a lot of liberal jews(like adam sandler and natalie portman)suck. they use and abuse us.         


Author: Boedicia
Date: Jun 14, 2008 00:03

On Jun 13, 10:53 pm, Robert Cohen msn.com> wrote:
> My impressions of the poster-ranter ain't at all pretty, so I hesitate
> posting 'em, but what the hay--what's a n.g. for ?
>
> High I.Q.person articulates mad beefs & ugly bitchings.
> Not able in anonymity to  acknowledge personal fraility, envy,
> weakness, self-interest, imperfections, sin--the usual stuff for the
> slinging of mud at enemies.
> Female probably, though not a certainty, though certainly coldly
> vicious.
> Projecting or displacing  racist self quite "liberally" onto others.
> Skillful at extrapolating & playing with problems & the beaucoup
> absurdities of others.
> A bottom-line ethnocentric--while isn't everybody at least somewhat?
> Has a few unfortunate Jews as acquaintances with non-joyous
> experiences.
> By bashing them sub-humans, the poster's self-righteous ravings
> nevertheless indicate fascination if not obssession & fixation: Has
> thought about the target for a long time.
> So smartly decontructs Jews while implicitly revealing herself ...
Show full article (1.40Kb)
no comments
Re: why a lot of liberal jews(like adam sandler and natalie portman)suck. they use and abuse us.         


Author: Schmuck
Date: Jun 14, 2008 07:50

isp.com> wrote in message
news:64429618-98ae-4d32-aea2-b728a06d827b@j33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 13, 10:53 pm, Robert Cohen msn.com> wrote:
> My impressions of the poster-ranter ain't at all pretty, so I hesitate
> posting 'em, but what the hay--what's a n.g. for ?
>
> High I.Q.person articulates mad beefs & ugly bitchings.
> Not able in anonymity to acknowledge personal fraility, envy,
> weakness, self-interest, imperfections, sin--the usual stuff for the
> slinging of mud at enemies.
> Female probably, though not a certainty, though certainly coldly
> vicious.
> Projecting or displacing racist self quite "liberally" onto others.
> Skillful at extrapolating & playing with problems & the beaucoup
> absurdities of others.
> A bottom-line ethnocentric--while isn't everybody at least somewhat?
> Has a few unfortunate Jews as acquaintances with non-joyous
> experiences.
> By bashing them sub-humans, the poster's self-righteous ravings
> nevertheless indicate fascination if not obssession & fixation: Has ...
Show full article (1.55Kb)
no comments
Re: why a lot of liberal jews(like adam sandler and natalie portman)suck. they use and abuse us.         


Author: Bret Cahill
Date: Jun 14, 2008 09:26

> My impressions of the poster-ranter ain't at all pretty, so I hesitate
> posting 'em,

Someone needs to say something.
> but what the hay--what's a n.g. for ?
> High I.Q.person

An unaccomplished person entirely incapable of any independent
thought.

Such a nobody it would be easy to ignore the post altogether.
> articulates mad beefs & ugly bitchings.
> Not able in anonymity to �acknowledge personal fraility, envy,
> weakness, self-interest, imperfections, sin--the usual stuff for the
> slinging of mud at enemies.
> Female probably,

I can only determine a writer's gender in _New Yorker_ articles.

I sometimes get corrected referring to a poster as "she."

Of course, that correction might be a lie as well.
> though not a certainty, though certainly coldly
> vicious.
Show full article (2.22Kb)
no comments
Re: why a lot of liberal jews(like adam sandler and natalie portman)suck. they use and abuse us.         


Author: Boedicia
Date: Jun 14, 2008 20:57

On Jun 13, 10:53 pm, Robert Cohen msn.com> wrote:
> My impressions of the poster-ranter ain't at all pretty, so I hesitate
> posting 'em, but what the hay--what's a n.g. for ?

It might help if you told us who you are referring to or are we
supposed to guess?
>
> High I.Q.person articulates mad beefs & ugly bitchings.
> Not able in anonymity to  acknowledge personal fraility, envy,
> weakness, self-interest, imperfections, sin--the usual stuff for the slinging of mud at enemies.

Makes no sense whatsoever.
> Female probably, though not a certainty, though certainly coldly vicious.
> Projecting or displacing  racist self quite "liberally" onto others.
> Skillful at extrapolating & playing with problems & the beaucoup
> absurdities of others.

Duh.
> A bottom-line ethnocentric--while isn't everybody at least somewhat?
> Has a few unfortunate Jews as acquaintances with non-joyous experiences.

Duh.
Show full article (2.26Kb)
no comments
Re: why a lot of liberal jews(like adam sandler and natalie portman)suck. they use and abuse us.         


Author: last_permutation
Date: Jul 2, 2008 19:00

On Jun 14, 10:50 am, "Schmuck" wrote:
> isp.com> wrote in message
>
> news:64429618-98ae-4d32-aea2-b728a06d827b@j33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 13, 10:53 pm, Robert Cohen msn.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> My impressions of the poster-ranter ain't at all pretty, so I hesitate
>> posting 'em, but what the hay--what's a n.g. for ?
>
>> High I.Q.person articulates mad beefs & ugly bitchings.
>> Not able in anonymity to acknowledge personal fraility, envy,
>> weakness, self-interest, imperfections, sin--the usual stuff for the
>> slinging of mud at enemies.
>> Female probably, though not a certainty, though certainly coldly
>> vicious.
>> Projecting or displacing racist self quite "liberally" onto others. ...
Show full article (1.85Kb)
no comments