Re: Whose philosophy is this ?
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.philosophy Profile…
 Up
Re: Whose philosophy is this ?         


Author: Immortalist
Date: Sep 14, 2008 21:32

On Sep 14, 6:08 pm, "curmudgeon" bresnan.net> wrote:
> "When you have eliminated the impossible,
> whatever remains,
> no matter how improbable,
> must be the truth."
>
> *Sherlock Holmes*
>
> Sir Arthur Ignatius Conan Doyle
> 1859 - 1930

I would instead say "When you have eliminated the impossible, some or
all of whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth,
if and only if the truth is not impossible."
4 Comments
Re: Whose philosophy is this ?         


Author: Shrikeback
Date: Sep 15, 2008 09:53

On Sep 14, 9:32 pm, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sep 14, 6:08 pm, "curmudgeon" bresnan.net> wrote:
>
>> "When you have eliminated the impossible,
>> whatever remains,
>> no matter how improbable,
>> must be the truth."
>
>> *Sherlock Holmes*
>
>> Sir Arthur Ignatius Conan Doyle
>> 1859 - 1930
>
> I would instead say "When you have eliminated the impossible, some or
> all of whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth,
> if and only if the truth is not impossible."

A far less controversial proposition, to be sure.
no comments
Re: Whose philosophy is this ?         


Author: The Borg Queen
Date: Sep 15, 2008 18:58

gmail.com> wrote in message
news:de5feaf6-bc64-4fa4-a885-859035f81c39@n38g2000prl.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 14, 9:32 pm, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sep 14, 6:08 pm, "curmudgeon" bresnan.net> wrote:
>
>> "When you have eliminated the impossible,
>> whatever remains,
>> no matter how improbable,
>> must be the truth."
>
>> *Sherlock Holmes*
>
>> Sir Arthur Ignatius Conan Doyle
>> 1859 - 1930
>
> I would instead say "When you have eliminated the impossible, some or
> all of whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth,
> if and only if the truth is not impossible."

A far less controversial proposition, to be sure.
Show full article (0.87Kb)
no comments
Re: Whose philosophy is this ?         


Author: T-minus108
Date: Sep 15, 2008 19:04

On Sep 15, 9:58 pm, "The Borg Queen" homesweethome.com> wrote:
> Sherlock Holmes was a detective and not a philosopher.
> He was applying the statement to solving cases not to the meaning of the
> universe!!! ;)
> The Borg Queen

But isn't the universe the most important 'case'?
no comments
Re: Whose philosophy is this ?         


Author: The Borg Queen
Date: Sep 15, 2008 19:17

"T-minus108" gmail.com> wrote in message
news:fc4a362d-74d2-493b-8aa5-fbef91efff09@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 15, 9:58 pm, "The Borg Queen" homesweethome.com> wrote:
> Sherlock Holmes was a detective and not a philosopher.
> He was applying the statement to solving cases not to the meaning of the
> universe!!! ;)
> The Borg Queen

But isn't the universe the most important 'case'?
>

But how would you apply this on a universal scale?
If you take the quote

"When you have eliminated the impossible,
whatever remains,
no matter how improbable,
must be the truth."
Show full article (0.99Kb)
no comments

RELATED THREADS
SubjectArticles qty Group
Re: Whose opinion to respect? Whose to disregard?sci.agriculture ·