|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: GaryGary Date: Oct 10, 2007 08:28
If you could have an ultimate poker party and money wasn't a
limitation, what male / female high profile people from history or
from philosophy, whom you admire or even dislike a great deal (if
anyone named is now deceased, assume they were made to become alive),
would you most want to invite to it. Plus what else would you want
to get up to with (or discuss with) any of the people named ?
|
| |
|
| | 5 Comments |
|
|
Author: curmudgeoncurmudgeon Date: Oct 10, 2007 11:24
"Gary" hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1192030136.612823.138460@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
If you could have an ultimate poker party and money wasn't a
limitation, what male / female high profile people from history or
from philosophy, whom you admire or even dislike a great deal (if
anyone named is now deceased, assume they were made to become alive),
would you most want to invite to it. Plus what else would you want
to get up to with (or discuss with) any of the people named ?
Assuming that we all could speak the same language, Emanuel Kant.
I would ask him to explain his philosophy to me.
"There are no enemies in science just anomalies"
*CUR*
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: BrynBryn Date: Oct 10, 2007 09:36
Needing no introduction "an" Usenet stalwart wrote:
>If you could have an ultimate poker party and money wasn't a
>limitation, what male / female high profile people from history or
>from philosophy, whom you admire or even dislike a great deal (if
>anyone named is now deceased, assume they were made to become alive),
>would you most want to invite to it. Plus what else would you want
>to get up to with (or discuss with) any of the people named ?
Do your own essays...
>
--
Bryn
To the Phenomenonologist,
legend is an artefact.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ImmortalistImmortalist Date: Oct 10, 2007 22:38
> Needing no introduction "an" Usenet stalwart wrote:
>
>>If you could have an ultimate poker party and money wasn't a
>>limitation, what male / female high profile people from history or
>>from philosophy, whom you admire or even dislike a great deal (if
>>anyone named is now deceased, assume they were made to become alive),
>>would you most want to invite to it. Plus what else would you want
>>to get up to with (or discuss with) any of the people named ?
>
> Do your own essays...
>
|
| Show full article (0.78Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Pat WmPat Wm Date: Oct 23, 2007 22:41
Gary wrote:
> If you could have an ultimate poker party and money wasn't a
> limitation, what male / female high profile people from history or
> from philosophy, whom you admire or even dislike a great deal (if
> anyone named is now deceased, assume they were made to become alive),
> would you most want to invite to it. Plus what else would you want
> to get up to with (or discuss with) any of the people named ?
Robert Oppenheimer who I knew in passing but never got to
sit down with and have a deep discussion. He was one of the most
under-estimated physicists of the last several centuries in my
estimation. He...
|
| Show full article (2.28Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: rick++rick++ Date: Oct 24, 2007 07:41
Abe Lincoln and the beaver.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
