"Malrassic Park"
hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4fpeb45g6njf3a91h0buo8lg3sta2e9ni8@4ax.com...> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:02:50 -0400, "tooly"
bellsouth.net>
> wrote:
>>>
>>Excellent writing and I hope others here will read this in its entirety.
>>Something has destroyed our culture dating back to civil rights
>>legislation
>>as the key dominoe, but few of us know the roots of where this blight has
>>come from. Cultural Marxism has been pinpointed time and again as a
>>likely
>>infiltration, but the idea of it's spread is vague. Most liberals today
>>would not see themselves as marxists per se, but this writing shows how it
>>influences modern behavior and thought under precepts of ideology. Thank
>>you.
>
> I'm disappointed because I don't think the article got around to
> defining "political correctness" as the thread title implies. The PC
> movement is simply a movement directed at eradicating the concepts
> of cultural, class, and race by attempting to drive distinctions of
> culture, class and race out of consciousness through a form of
> "see-no-evil" denial. Deny it until it goes out of existence, or at
> least out of personal and social reality.
But don't you see that this is tyranny? Forcing issues upon people no
matter the idealogy is wrong. We are not so wise as to understand all
nuiances of nature's intention. The article suggests that all forced
Ideology ends up in tyranny, which is a broad stroke, but as I think, I
understand it's point. There is a natural intercourse of human
communications whereby, order is established by true mass will and "We the
People" remains an efficable concept. Only then can we think we have freely
and naturally come to whatever ends we find ourselves [e.g. a free society].
But what has gone down since civil rights has not been a movement of mass
will, but a forced indoctrination of elitist thinking. It is tyranny.
None of what has happened would have taken place 'naturally', but only
through political coersion. We are no longer a free society for this in
much the same way the USSR was overseen by a tyrannical 'few' who
incorporated what they saw as best for the masses [which turned into a
simple control of corrupt power].
>
> Racism, on the other hand, attempts not only to maintain racial
> distinctions, but to emphasize and exaggerate them, while Marxism
> attempts to emphasize and exaggerate class distinctions.
Again, don't you see that the error is in degree either way one stands? I
don't consider myself a racist, but a realist; but by todays absolute
definitions, I am deemed a racist and outcast. What is really outcast is
simple truth. Does no one observe that our Olympic basketball team is all
black? Or that sprinters are all black? Or that 70%% of the NFL is black?
I didn't make this world, but apparently race has significanse from a very
pragmatic point of view [not so much ideological]; but that we have made it
an ideological taboo to even talk about this significanse that race is, we
now alter our social existence in extensive ways that may never be recovered
if in 'error'. And I am here to shout as loud as I can, misengenation of
the white race is in vile error...for in time, it can only end up in
annihilation...or at the very least, a collapse of civil existence which is
the backbone of western civilization. I'm not talking about criminal
behavior (that too will rise in time in a general amorality) so much as the
deteriation of the family unit, which is the foundry for all human
relations.
There is a reason things have evolved like they have. We can't sit in
judgment of that evolution either way, but only observe its reality and then
alter course ever so slightly to incorporate any idealism...not in grandious
giant leaps and certainly not in ocean-sized sweeping 'changes' that have
now been installed. Demoralization is only the beginning of a long deep
decline in the human condition. We are now going backwards and in every way
very like what took place in the USSR, but from a cultural movement rather
than political [though now it becomes political also].
Does no one else see this? How we have been changed for the worse?
>
> The PC movement is not Marxist in its goals, but in its methods which
> are socially repressive in its attempts to enforce the denial I
> mentioned above.
Communism had 'utopian goals'. All idealism has utopian-like goals. It is
by it's methods that people are imprisoned.
