Author: sirblobsirblob Date: Apr 2, 2007 23:27
On 2 avr, 14:28, "Fred Weiss" papertig.com> wrote:> On Apr 2, 6:56 am, "Michael S. Morris" netdirect.net> wrote:
>>> Monday, the 2nd of April, 2007
>> Which is the chilling and horrible and liberty-crushing and unjust
>> result of sexual-harassment law as it now stands.
nothing liberty-crushing about what he said.
It is a direct
>> attack on the First Amendment that empowers people to sue other people
>> for "being offended", ...
>
> It is not a 1st Amendment issue. In the work environment no one has
> the right to offend anymore than they have the right to not be
> offended. It relates more to the right of association, i.e. the right
> to work for or hire whomever one wishes. If an employer (foolishly or
> otherwise) doesn't want to hire women, that's his right.
his ''right'' is it.. ah yes, you're probably an american. at least
you're honest when you admit your country is a republic, not a
democracy...
| 
