First Who is God.

As per Hindu Mythology:

God is the Creator of Universe.. God is all energy this Universe has.

Scintific Mythology:

Universe was created by Big Bang.

But who created this Big Bang from unknown.

If Scince say Big Bang can be created from Unknown then why not
another Big Bang takes place and why it happened only once.

If there is a reasion of Big Bang then I think such Big Bang can be
created 100s of places and every second there are many Big Bank taking
place outside our Universe creating millions of new Universe..

Scientist say Size of universe was smaller than a water molecule when
Big Bang took Place.

Then what was the space outside that.

Why did Big Bang took place only once.

Can't there be 100s of places where Big Bank can take place.

Was Time Stopped before Big Bang.

If Time was Stopped before Big Bang what kicked Time that it starts
running after Big Bang.

On May 28, 11:02 am, Sanny hotmail.com> wrote:

A God or god may or may not exist, and it is a convenient explaination
of unexplainable causation and networks of causes, like thunder/rain
shapes in a bush, etc... we may have evolved this God[s] instinct by
chance or it put in us by a creator, undeterminable, like whether
unicorns exist.

Sanny wrote:

This is just as silly a myth as god creating the Universe. It makes more
sense to look at the big bang as part of a cycle or torus of change.
That is, the known Universe engages in a series of expansions and
contractions or the expansion folds back into a contraction. Think of
the Universe as more of a donut not a sheet of paper. This gets rid of
the patently absurd creation out of nothing myth but unfortunately
implies an intelligent conscious Universe, whatever intelligence and
consciousness really are.

On May 28, 10:02 am, Sanny hotmail.com> wrote:

I think it bears repeating something I suggested to turtoni. He asked me
what is 'good'. I asked him back 'what is bad'. I am absolutely convinced
that however we see either, we cannot abscond from our human responsibility
and at all times, even when consulting through intellectual non-bias, we
either are serving 'good' or 'bad'....or in a more traditional vernacular,
'good or evil'.

We cannot be neutral. We cannot be absolutely objective to the point of
being a 'non-player'. We cannot hide behind our science that might decry
'inhuman' things (again, I refer to the Josef Menegele mindset), such as the
unraveling of human consciousness for no other reason than curiosity, and
expect to remain innocent. We take sides at all times. And stupidity in
the modern age, is no longer a defense.

Hubris and ego may lead one to think they are 'above' the situation [as I'm
sure Sir would affirm], but it is just hubris and ego. We either stand WITH
the human cause, or against it...but never ABOVE it. Immort, I do believe
you try at times to stand 'above' it. IMHumbleO of course.

A story meant to produce "religious" type qualia in the
story practitioner. Confabulating, producing, or experiencing,
all practice methods. "God" stories are ubiquitous, thus they
have a genetic basis at some practical level, including the
human propensity to personify everything.
The question of why there is a situation, rather than nothing,
cannot be so simply answered, it remains mysterious.

Uncertainty. The great attractor.

Whether in the Mona Lias smile, where the
expressions are left uncertain, allowing the
observer to decide.

Or a hot debate like global warming, where the
consensus is elusive, we instinctively are drawn
in and try to restore a sense of certainty.

There is a direct mathematical relationship
between uncertainty, and the concept of God
that rings true across the ages and civilizations.

Uncertainty and imagination converge on infinity together.

One extreme brings another.
It's a normal instinct to assume the most difficult questions
of all, where uncertainty is highest, can only be answered
by the grandest wisdom of all. Some God.

But that's our instincts at work.

Our intellect should tell us just the opposite is true.
That uncertainty....itself....is the source of all Creation.

As in....

Sanny wrote:

God is Sterculius. In the whole of human history across the entire
planet not one deity has volunteered Novocain. It is a telling
omission.

[snip crap]

Hindus have 36 crores of gods - 360 million deities. How is India
doing?

Can God make a collection plate so vast that even He cannot fill it?
Sure! ALL OF THEM. What can be asserted without evidence can also be
dismissed without evidence.

"Sanny" hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7b88e6e8-ab07-40c9-af0f-3eb950b68f38@w1g2000prd.googlegroups.com...

"Uncle Al" hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:483DFF6C.D6790553@hate.spam.net...

You've never heard of the placebo effect?

Belief can be a very powerful 'fact'. It can be the difference
between life and death... war and peace.

When one can't understand something, it's as likely to
be ascribed to some God, as it is to be dismissed outright.
As you've shown, it works both ways.

You give far too much weight to objective scientific evidence.
Evidence, or facts, are for understanding the trivial, that
which has little meaning. Which is the past and present.