|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: zinniczinnic Date: Jul 2, 2008 07:55
Death of a previous non-existence?
|
| |
|
| | 30 Comments |
|
|
Author: tata Date: Jul 2, 2008 08:16
On Jul 2, 10:55 am, zinnic gate.net> wrote:> Death of a previous non-existence?
Birth, like death, is merely a change of form. Birth and death are
convenient linguistic conventions for dealing in the world of time,
which is both necessary and misleading.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: bigfletch8bigfletch8 Date: Jul 2, 2008 08:31
On Jul 3, 12:55 am, zinnic gate.net> wrote:> Death of a previous non-existence?
Birth of what?
An idea that came from nothing, or just the death of previous ideas in
forming a new one?
The initial dividing of the single cell at the beginning of the
physical body?
The death is that of an illusion,a percieved reality, that didnt
really exist. An example being success related joy, where the
association is then discovered to be unrelated.The percieved need for
success dies and the joy remains. Joy being an aspect of the authentic
self.
Of course, these days of scientific progress, we can even see that at
the material level that what first appears real, is in fact only a
subjective interpretation. The perception is continually dying and
being reborn.
BOfL
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: zinniczinnic Date: Jul 2, 2008 08:58
On Jul 2, 10:31 am, "bigflet...@ gmail.com" gmail.com>
wrote:> On Jul 3, 12:55 am, zinnic gate.net> wrote:
>>> Death of a previous non-existence?
>
> Birth of what?
>
> An idea that came from nothing, or just the death of previous ideas in
> forming a new one?
> The initial dividing of the single cell at the beginning of the
> physical body?
> The death is that of an illusion,a percieved reality, that didnt
> really exist. An example being success related joy, where the
> association is then discovered to be unrelated.The percieved need for
> success dies and the joy remains. Joy being an aspect of the authentic
> self.
Is misery also "an aspect of the authentic self".
|
| Show full article (1.02Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: zinniczinnic Date: Jul 2, 2008 09:17
On Jul 2, 10:16 am, ta nc.rr.com> wrote:> On Jul 2, 10:55 am, zinnic gate.net> wrote:
>>> Death of a previous non-existence?
>
> Birth, like death, is merely a change of form. Birth and death are
> convenient linguistic conventions for dealing in the world of time,
> which is both necessary and misleading.
True. Each process known as life, integrates then disintegrates. It
does not dis-intergrate then re-integrate.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: tata Date: Jul 2, 2008 09:47
On Jul 2, 12:17 pm, zinnic gate.net> wrote:> On Jul 2, 10:16 am, ta nc.rr.com> wrote:
>>> On Jul 2, 10:55 am, zinnic gate.net> wrote:>
>>> Death of a previous non-existence?
>
>> Birth, like death, is merely a change of form. Birth and death are
>> convenient linguistic conventions for dealing in the world of time,
>> which is both necessary and misleading.
>
> True. Each process known as life, integrates then disintegrates. It
> does not dis-intergrate then re-integrate.
I don't think it "disintegrates" . . . it just changes.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Langevinger66Langevinger66 Date: Jul 2, 2008 09:50
On 2 jul, 18:47, ta nc.rr.com> wrote:> On Jul 2, 12:17 pm, zinnic gate.net> wrote:
>>> On Jul 2, 10:16 am, ta nc.rr.com> wrote:>
>>> On Jul 2, 10:55 am, zinnic gate.net> wrote:>
>>>> Death of a previous non-existence?
>
>>> Birth, like death, is merely a change of form. Birth and death are
>>> convenient linguistic conventions for dealing in the world of time,
>>> which is both necessary and misleading.
>
>> True. Each process known as life, integrates then disintegrates. It
>> does not dis-intergrate then re-integrate.
>
> I don't think it "disintegrates" . . . it just changes.
hypocrits
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: JackJack Date: Jul 2, 2008 09:58
> Death of a previous non-existence?
No it's the emergence of a baby from a woman.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: tata Date: Jul 2, 2008 10:10
On Jul 2, 12:58 pm, "Jack" yahoo.com> wrote:>> Death of a previous non-existence?
>
> No it's the emergence of a baby from a woman.
You mean you haven't been born again?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: JackJack Date: Jul 2, 2008 10:12
> On Jul 2, 12:58 pm, "Jack" yahoo.com> wrote:>>> Death of a previous non-existence?
>>
>> No it's the emergence of a baby from a woman.
>
> You mean you haven't been born again?
>
No I like things the way they are.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
