On Jun 25, 1:54 pm, Williamknowsbest gmail.com> wrote:
> Listen you flaming asshole, if you can erect a $28 billion coal to
> liquids facility in LESS than 10 years - I'll pay you a considerable
> sum to do it.
>
> I don't think ANY alternative energy program has had this much spent
> on it. Furthermore, I think if you took ALL the alternative energy
> programs TOGETHER they wouldn't add up to $28 billion -
>
> and I have EIGHT programs like this underway worldwide.
>
> So, please forgive me for saying FUCK YOU and the horse you rode in on
> you ignorant savage.
>
> On Jun 25, 2:12 pm, BradGuth gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> And so little if anything of "Williamknowsbest" has yet to directly
>> benefit another living or soon to be prematurely dead soul.
>
>> Even our Zionist/Nazi DARPA (aka New World Order) has been doing a
>> better job than Williamknowsbest.
>
>> - Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth
We do need to create a vast surplus of green and renewable energy
that’ll get the most out of our remaining fossil and biofuel/synfuel
spendy alternatives, while creating the least amount of CO2 and zero
NOx per KW.hr in the process. Hydrogen and atmosphere alone can not
entirely accomplish this without creating NOx, but then green/
renewable hydrogen peroxide along with having to consume as little as
15%% fossil or biofuel/synfuel is looking rather good, as well h2o2/
aluminum usage as fuel/energy cells can fill many other portable
energy demanding applications, such as personal transportation and
light recreational demands. We also need a viable national energy
grid to match our 15%% portion of the future global 100 TW worth of
government, commercial and private electrical energy demands.
For safety and energy efficiency on behalf of private homes, offices
and commercial operations need to become as much electrified as
possible, as well as taken from our new and improved national (meaning
interstate/federal) power grids, with remote pocket communities using
thorium and a host of perfectly viable forms of renewable alternatives
(if need be including those vast farms of Mook PVs).
On Jun 25, 1:54 pm, Williamknowsbest gmail.com> wrote:
> Listen you flaming asshole, if you can erect a $28 billion coal to
> liquids facility in LESS than 10 years - I'll pay you a considerable
> sum to do it.
At best (Yiddish balls to the wall), we have 100 years of converting
our best quality coal and another 100 years of medium to poor quality
coal to convert. Then what final century of fossil dregs are we
talking about? (lowest grade coal and shale conversions at 10 tonnes
per tonne of liquid fuel?)
Converting oily sands, oily muck and oily rock/shale into usable road
asphalt, aviation, marine shipping, commercial truck, bus and private
transportation and recreational usage of various liquid fuels is
technically doable, as long as continued CO2 pollution (including NOx
and multiple other toxins plus radiation) at $10+/gallon and $1/kwhr
isn't a problem. Actually, by the end of 100 years from now and with
China plus India taking up the global lions share, we'll be thanking
our lucky stars if such liquid fuel is only at $10/gallon, because
more than likely it'll be headed towards the WWIII $100/gallon mark,
and otherwise our electrical energy looking good at $10/kwhr, mostly
because wind, tidal, solar and geothermal as well as thorium and 3He/
fusion derived energy doesn't make weapons grade fuel for
accommodating your WWIII, WWIV and WWV.
Running the same kind of equipment at the current levels of
performance, having the same amounts of cargo and passenger hauling
capability via your green hydrogen and fuel cells is a spendy joke,
unless utilized as direct combustion along with atmosphere that'll
involve our having to capture and/or convert all of that pesky NOx,
not to mention dealing with the required volumetric factors of those
bulky hydrogen fuel tanks in order to match the 350+ mile automotive
cruising range would tend to make any such combination not the least
bit comparable, especially if we’re stuck with having the conventional
4-cycle ICE involved with turning them wheels at perhaps 15%% thermal
dynamic efficiency.
Your less than vapor kind of green hydrogen that'll seemingly never
come to past unless your offshore bank accounts are getting stuffed
with our hard earned public loot is very ENRON/ExxonMobil of
yourself. DARPA is obviously quite proud of their brown-nosed minions
and fellow rusemasters like yourself, but then so would their Hitler
have been impressed.
> Williamknowsbest:
> I don't think ANY alternative energy program has had this much spent
> on it. Furthermore, I think if you took ALL the alternative energy
> programs TOGETHER they wouldn't add up to $28 billion -
>
> and I have EIGHT programs like this underway worldwide.
>
> So, please forgive me for saying FUCK YOU and the horse you rode in on
> you ignorant savage.
At least I'm not the one telling lies, excluding evidence and
otherwise pretending that I'm somebody that’s worth some extra “$28
billion(x8)” special that I'm not. I'm also not intellectually skewed
or otherwise manic bipolar enough to have worked for the likes of your
Hitler or those of your New World Order of trickle-up economy that
specifically favors and otherwise directly benefits the uppermost 0.1%%
(or less). BTW, coal gasification is not a Williamknowsbest (aka
William Mook) invention, nor is PV derived energy.
Obviously those Zionist/Nazi folks have always been darn good at
converting coal into synfuel, because it's what gave their puppet
Hitler exactly what was needed at the time, including their makings of
hydrogen peroxide(h2o2) that's so downright nifty for so many things
besides enhanced combustion.
Perhaps a greener and cleaner world of 25%% renewable hydrogen, 50%%
renewable hydrogen peroxide, 20%% nuclear/fusion and 5%% fossil/synfuel
is affordably sustainable without the use of those faith-based
perpetrated wars or other lethal and collateral damaging alternatives.
Of course, in the Williamknowsbest pretend-atheist mindset that is
forever hell bent upon forgetting about your sorted past, especially
the past of those upper most 0.1%% that you continually brown-nose,
whereas in your skewed mindset is where the New World Order as the
ultimate goal of Mook always justifies the means. In other words, the
New World Order of lord Mook is almost complete as long as the public
in general can be forever snookered and dumbfounded past the point of
no return.
- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth