On Jun 25, 1:54 pm, Williamknowsbest
gmail.com> wrote:> Listen you flaming asshole, if you can erect a $28 billion coal to
> liquids facility in LESS than 10 years - I'll pay you a considerable
> sum to do it.
At best (Yiddish balls to the wall), we have 100 years of quality coal
and another 100 years of medium to poor quality coal to convert. Then
what fossil dregs are we talking about? (lowest grade coal conversions
at 10 tonnes per tonne of liquid fuel?)
Converting oily sands, oily muck and oily rock into usable road
asphalt, aviation, marine shipping, commercial trucks, bus and private
transportation usage of various liquid fuels is technically doable, as
long as continued CO2 pollution (including NOx, multiple other toxins
and radiation) at $10+/gallon plus $1/kwhr isn't a problem. Actually,
by the end of 100 years from now, we'll be thanking our lucky stars if
fuel is only at $10/gallon, because more than likely it'll be headed
towards the $100/gallon mark, and otherwise our electrical energy
looking good at $10/kwhr, mostly because wind, tidal, solar and
geothermal as well as thorium derived energy doesn't make weapons
grade fuel for your WWIII, WWIV and WWV.
Running the same equipment at the current levels of performance, with
the same amounts of cargo and passenger capability via your green
hydrogen and fuel cells is a spendy joke, unless utilized as direct
combustion with atmosphere that'll involve having to capture and/or
convert all of that pesky NOx, not to mention dealing with the
required volumetric factors of those hydrogen fuel tanks in order to
match the 350+ mile automotive cruising range would make any such
combination not the least bit comparable, especially if stuck with
having the conventional 4-cycle ICE involved.
Your less than vapor kind of green hydrogen that'll seemingly never
come to past unless your offshore bank accounts are getting stuffed
with our hard earned public loot is very ENRON/ExxonMobil of
yourself. DARPA is obviously very proud of their brown-nosed minions
and fellow rusemasters like yourself, but then so would their Hitler
have been impressed.
>
> I don't think ANY alternative energy program has had this much spent
> on it. Furthermore, I think if you took ALL the alternative energy
> programs TOGETHER they wouldn't add up to $28 billion -
>
> and I have EIGHT programs like this underway worldwide.
>
> So, please forgive me for saying FUCK YOU and the horse you rode in on
> you ignorant savage.
At least I'm not the one telling lies, excluding evidence and
otherwise pretending that I'm somebody that I'm not. I'm also not
intellectually or otherwise bipolar.
Obviously those Zionist/Nazi folks have always been darn good at
converting coal, because it's what gave their puppet Hitler exactly
what was needed at the time, including their makings of hydrogen
peroxide(h2o2) that's so downright nifty for so many things.
Of course, in your pretend-atheist mindset that is hell bent upon
forgetting about your sorted past, especially of those you continually
brown-nose, whereas in your skewed mindset, obviously the goal of Mook
always justifies the means. The New World Order of lord Mook is
almost complete.
- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth
