|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: JohnJohn Date: Jun 25, 2008 14:41
Williamknowsbest wrote:
> [... snip ...]
If you are William Mook, the engineer and inventor, then I am all eyes
and ears. What you are attempting has enough challenges that, in my
opinion, it is a waste of time to bother with the pests of Usenet.
Speak to the journals, continue patents.
Watching with interest and fascination,
J
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: BradGuthBradGuth Date: Jun 25, 2008 15:06
On Jun 25, 1:54 pm, Williamknowsbest gmail.com> wrote:> Listen you flaming asshole, if you can erect a $28 billion coal to
> liquids facility in LESS than 10 years - I'll pay you a considerable
> sum to do it.
At best (Yiddish balls to the wall), we have 100 years of quality coal
and another 100 years of medium to poor quality coal to convert. Then
what fossil dregs are we talking about? (lowest grade coal conversions
at 10 tonnes per tonne of liquid fuel?)
Converting oily sands, oily muck and oily rock into usable road
asphalt, aviation, marine shipping, commercial trucks, bus and private
transportation usage of various liquid fuels is technically doable, as
long as continued CO2 pollution (including NOx, multiple other toxins
and radiation) at $10+/gallon plus $1/kwhr isn't a problem. Actually,
by the end of 100 years from now, we'll be thanking our lucky stars if
fuel is only at $10/gallon, because more than likely it'll be headed
towards the $100/gallon mark, and otherwise our electrical energy
looking good at $10/kwhr, mostly because wind, tidal, solar and
geothermal as well as thorium derived energy doesn't make weapons
grade fuel for your WWIII, WWIV and WWV.
|
| Show full article (3.25Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: zzbunkerzzbunker Date: Jun 25, 2008 15:27
On Jun 25, 11:52 am, Williamknowsbest gmail.com> wrote:> You've explained why helicopters today aren't being widely used and
> elided any reference to potential growth... which if investments were
> made in this technology, would result in improvements in the features
> you speak about.
People with ALL heavier-than-air technology, including cars have
greatly overestimated
their abiliity with future technology.
Which is mostly why the brighter people turned their wasted garages
in computer and laser factories.
And turned their houses into PV Cell Solariums.
And turned their idiot malls into Hologram outlets,
And turned their bridge companies into titaniium companies.
And tunred their idiot electric companies into microwave companies.
And turned their idiot schools into philosophy satellites.
And turned their idiot army into cell phone repairmen.
And turned their idiot coal companies into robot dodgers.
.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: BradGuthBradGuth Date: Jun 25, 2008 15:58
On Jun 25, 2:16 pm, John wrote:
> Williamknowsbest wrote:
>> Listen you flaming asshole, if you can erect a $28 billion coal to
>> liquids facility in LESS than 10 years - I'll pay you a considerable
>> sum to do it.
>
> If you are so rich, why aren't you smart?
>
>> I don't think ANY alternative energy program has had this much spent
>> on it. Furthermore, I think if you took ALL the alternative energy
>> programs TOGETHER they wouldn't add up to $28 billion -
>
>> and I have EIGHT programs like this underway worldwide.
>
> Where, and under what name, and why are you posting lies and drivel here
> so that your grandchildren can look back and think, "Gee, what an
> asshole he was" ?
>
>> So, please forgive me for saying FUCK YOU and the horse you rode in on
>> you ignorant savage. ...
|
| Show full article (1.25Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: BradGuthBradGuth Date: Jun 25, 2008 16:07
On Jun 25, 2:41 pm, John wrote:
> Williamknowsbest wrote:
>> [... snip ...]
>
> If you are William Mook, the engineer and inventor, then I am all eyes
> and ears. What you are attempting has enough challenges that, in my
> opinion, it is a waste of time to bother with the pests of Usenet.
> Speak to the journals, continue patents.
>
> Watching with interest and fascination,
>
> J
You will not be surprised, because lord Mook has had more than a
decade to R&D and even accomplish much of whatever he spouts off
about. Unfortunately, he is a certified rusemaster of the Zionist/
Nazi kind, the exact same as what gave Hitler so much extra physics
and science to work with, subsequently giving all the rest of us a
serious and spendy pain in the butt, if not having taken more than
many of us and even those of his own kind had to give.
|
| Show full article (0.90Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: jonathanjonathan Date: Jun 24, 2008 16:10
"Pat Flannery" daktel.com> wrote in message
news:JMGdnV_Gveg4w_zVnZ2dnUVZ_rPinZ2d@posted.northdakotatelephone...>>
>> Well, many of us were motivated by that idealism in younger days,
>> but after it became apparent what Boeing, AT&T, IBM, and GM did to
>> that
>> plan, they switched over to AI, lasers, drones, computers, robots,
>> PV Cells,
>> orbiting silicon, and colder fusion.
>>
>
> I still want to see that helicopter weaving through the trees in the
> yard....while trying not to hit them with its rotors as it heads in and out of
> the garage.
> The place for the copter isn't in the garage, it's on the roof. :-)
> And speaking of helicopters, let's look at a helicopter of the future as seen
> from 1935: ...
|
| Show full article (1.02Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: jonathanjonathan Date: Jun 25, 2008 17:07
> You've explained why helicopters today aren't being widely used and
> elided any reference to potential growth... which if investments were
> made in this technology, would result in improvements in the features
> you speak about.
The future by William was remarkable! And the standard response
just as sound. Which is typically along the lines, in some manner or
another...."How ya' gonna get enough energy to do...that"?
Please never forget what fuels such dreams of future possibilities.
The same thing that inspired all those Trekkian dreams of
properity and justice......an unlimited and cheap supply of
clean energy.....those magical di-lithium crystals.
And voila almost anything is possible.
Without it, dreams go up in smoke.
Instead of detailing an ideal future, as William did so well, by
starting from the present and steadily expanding into the future.
I would do the opposite, because predicting the future of a
real world system is the hardest thing to do of all.
|
| Show full article (2.60Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: AmericanAmerican Date: Jun 26, 2008 05:46
On Jun 25, 6:27 pm, "zzbun...@ netscape.net" netscape.net>
wrote:> On Jun 25, 11:52 am, Williamknowsbest gmail.com> wrote:
>>> You've explained why helicopters today aren't being widely used and
>> elided any reference to potential growth... which if investments were
>> made in this technology, would result in improvements in the features
>> you speak about.
>
> People with ALL heavier-than-air technology, including cars have
> greatly overestimated
> their abiliity with future technology.
> Which is mostly why the brighter people turned their wasted garages
> in computer and laser factories.
> And turned their houses into PV Cell Solariums.
> And turned their idiot malls into Hologram outlets,
> And turned their bridge companies into titaniium companies.
> And tunred their idiot electric companies into microwave companies.
> And turned their idiot schools into philosophy satellites.
> And turned their idiot army into cell phone repairmen. ...
|
| Show full article (2.72Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Pat FlanneryPat Flannery Date: Jun 26, 2008 06:32
Williamknowsbest wrote:
> All of these problems are workable - as was demonstrated by the Jet
> Gyrodyne
>
> http://www.gyropilot.co.uk/downloads/Rotodyne%%202%%20RTF%%20Mod.pdf
>
> Here an engine, designed to operate efficiently at subsonic speeds
> produces a jet of super charged air that is directed through a rotor
> to tip jets -here the noise is abated, due to the rotor itself acting
> like a tuned muffler, and night visibility is not a problem - due to
> the temperatures of the exhaust at that point.
>
Both the Gyrodyne and follow-on Rotodyne suffered from high tip jet
noise problems; in fact, it was the noise that the Rotodyne's supersonic
exhaust tip jets generated that led to its cancellation - it was
intended to takeoff and land from pads in the interior of cities, but
the noise level was so high that the airlines that looked at it found it
unacceptable because of this...and it's still a problem with rotor-tip
jet propulsion: http://www.rotaryforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=15533
|
| Show full article (1.02Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: zzbunkerzzbunker Date: Jun 26, 2008 07:08
On Jun 26, 8:46 am, American comcast.net> wrote:> On Jun 25, 6:27 pm, "zzbun...@ netscape.net" netscape.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> On Jun 25, 11:52 am, Williamknowsbest gmail.com> wrote:>
>>> You've explained why helicopters today aren't being widely used and
>>> elided any reference to potential growth... which if investments were
>>> made in this technology, would result in improvements in the features
>>> you speak about.
>
>> People with ALL heavier-than-air technology, including cars have
>> greatly overestimated
>> their abiliity with future technology.
>> Which is mostly why the brighter people turned their wasted garages
>> in computer and laser factories. ...
|
| Show full article (3.35Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
