On Jun 22, 7:43Â am, rays...@
webtv.net (Raymond Speer) wrote:
> Dies Lunae, Day One (May 50 BC)
>
> Greetings, Julius Caesar, from your friend, Pompey.
>
> Your daughter, my wife Julia, has certainly inherited the "practicality"
> of her grandmother, Aurelia. Â You saw that clever wine fountain she
> rigged up, the one that pours a dose of wine into a cup on dropping a
> coin into the slot. Well, she has surpassed herself with another clever
> little device.
>
> She has a slave pour water in a copper kettle and a complicated
> mechanism conducts steam to a grindstone which rolls and grinds grain.
> The other day, she had going for twelve hours and the sole slave
> required was a 12 year old to keep the water coming.
>
> I dub my wife Julia Inventia for her wit and ingenuity. She is having
> the stonemasons build an aqueduct now so that water will come to her
> grindstone in a steady stream.
>
> We all know that Cato is not apt to praise Caesar's daughter, but that
> old politiican addressed the Senate last week  and complimented Julia on
> her work. We had all the conservative benches over at our house for
> luncheon so they could see the magic grindstone. Â Cato has given us a
> new word --- auto-matic --- to describe the self-activating property of
> Julia's grindstone.
>
> I have talked about an extension of your authority in Gaul, but [ snip
> further  words].
>
> Dies Martis, Day Nine. Â
>
> Greetings, Pompey Magnus, First Citizen and husband of my beloved
> daughter, from Julius Caesar.
>
> I thank you for news of your wife, my daughter, and I agree  with you
> that she truly deserves the name Julia Inventia. You know that she was
> only eight when she designed her unique mousetrap, and her pattern is
> used throughout the City and the Empire today!
>
> Could you have a good diagram made of Julia Inventia's grindstone, Â and
> send along a slave who was a competent artisan on the project? The Long
> Haired Gauls are impressed by any magic that we do which their Druids
> cannot match, and I want them to see what my own daughter has done in
> far away Rome.
>
> I am disappointed in  A. Scipio's faction [snip further words]
>
> Dies Martis, Day Sixteen.
>
> Greetings, G. Julius Caesar, revered father, from your loving daughter,
> Julia Inventia, wife to Pompey Magnus, First Citizen of the Senate.
>
> I send you this letter together with the slave Rufus, whose testimony
> ought to supplement these plans of my automatic mill.
>
> The principle is the same as the toys you and momma bought me when I was
> a little girl. You remember the little chariot that carried my dolls
> around that miniature track. Â Steam can be used for more than baths and
> toys.
>
> My wheel spokes mechanism is moderately successful. I flatten the spokes
> until they are like paddles and move them in circular directions,
> causing them to stir the air on sultry days. Â The difficulty is the
> connecting material by which I link the rotating spokes to the steam
> source of my kettle. Cloth and rope tear too frequently and chains get
> caught on corners and stuck too often. Do you have any suggestions as to
> what might substitute for those things?
>
> Your grandson, Julius Minor, is happy and active, and, Goddess be
> praised, I have fully recovered from the sickness I had when he was
> born, and [ snip further words]. Â
>
> =========================
>
> I think that steam power might have been developed in ancient Greece and
> Rome  independently several times, but never prominently enough to make
> a big difference in history.
>
> Even among the best educated and wealthy Romans, half of their minds
> were never given encouragement simply for being females. And commoners
> and slaves had even less chance.
>
> The Romans had no patent system. If a Julia Inventia invented a better
> mousetrap, there was no practical way to profit by it. Each household
> might duplicate such a device on a common design, or a craftsman might
> stock a shelf with a few dozen, but mass production of an item was not
> going to occur.
>
> Also, a yoke around the shoulders of two slave kids was going to be a
> cheaper motive force for a grindstone than the kettle and copper of a
> Julia Inventia. Such devices could be praised for ingenuity, but they
> weren't cheaper than their pedestrain alternatives.
Nice analysis. The whole socio-economic system interacts with the
development of science and technology in a highly dynamic fashion.
The notion that there are these great "geniuses" who change everything
simply by force of their "genius" is naive in the extreme. No doubt,
Newton, Archimedes, Edison, Einstein, Galileo, Aristotle etc. were
indeed great geniuses, but, they also must have had advantages of time
and place to achieve their greatest results. We are social animals.
We can do very little entirely on our own, no matter how determined
and intelligent we may be.